Accused: Dazzler72 and *jonny*

Dazzler72
*jonny*




The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis





Game number(s):

8921152



Comments:

@megas woman im sure you can see that i didn't write that. show me something that i wrote instead of blind accusations. If you all were so intent of fairness then fillout a ticket for Conquistadores. As for the WE DO in AAfitz note above, the "we" is ES, AA, jefjef, and megas (jefjef's woman). You ...

If they do review every case together that would be helpful to clarity.

if EVIL SEMP does the review im sure i will be.

Accused: EVIL SEMP

The accused are suspected of: Biased review and suspected motive/friendship with AAFITZ

Comments: Please have a MOD other than EVIL SEMP review the accusations against me in thread (ponzi sevensociety secret diplomacy) as he has played 36 games with the accuser (AAFITZ) with ...

I just took a 5 min look at my games and here are just a few of the hundreds where the 3rd player who was the lowest rank won the game. If i were bent on making sure that the lowest rank lost the game explain all of these. These are just a few....i could list many many more for you to look at. Its ...

"It means that there isn't enough proof to give you a warning or a block"

of course there isn't because there was no secret diplomacy. God knows you probably looked for one as hard as you could and then came up with whatever you could to try to not have this cleared against me. I have already ...

You have moved this to the closed reports? without resolution? After all that this report gets a NOTED? If there is NO evidence of a secret diplomacy I want this CLEARED. No way am i going to settle for a NOTED which leaves the issue unresolved publicly. If you didn't find anything then CLEAR it don ...

What does that have to do with the issue at hand? What does NOTING the report mean? And from what i got from your message you are not noting for the secret diplomacy accusation but for comments i made in a game indicating that i would rather not lose to a private or lower rank. Who here given the ...

Your observations are again valid. Your unbiased observations and cool head would make you a good mod. I am fired up about this but what you say makes sense and i will try to focus on the issue at hand. thanks

I wont change your mind and you wont change my mind. Simple as that. I wont back down and roll over so lets just wait for the outcome.

You wrote "What a player like myself would post after seeing an accusation against myself like this would post, would be the obvious answer of a player not cheating. Well, Im not cheating, Im not favoring the other player, even though its obvious why it looked that way. Instead you suggest there was ...

As if you could speak of fair play. is that why you set up games on Feudal, Age of Realms, and World 2.1 and play privates and cadets? Because you actually believe that they have a 50% chance of winning? If there is such a skill difference why are you allowed to play them on those maps? because ...

Snowgun wrote:

SevenSociety wrote: And im pretty sure there are 7 chicks on CC

haha now that's funny

This post was made by LetGodSortThem who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.

P.S. I wont read your retarded response...

sure you wont...you cant help yourself

Snowgun...i was serious. there are many ways to look at/into this but that was a good observation that no one else noticed. I try to give credit where credit is due. And im pretty sure there are 7 chicks on CC

Sortthem you don't even pay to play so no one gives an F about your opinion. and 59 games in 4 years, yeah...that's about as irrelevant as you can get.

This is honestly a good observation and this point hadn't even occurred to me to check "Most of the times they have taken each other out first." How is there a secret diplomacy and we are "executing" the third player when the third player survives to the end in most of our games since we eliminate ...

You can't reason with insanity and vindictiveness Tdans. Let AA waste his time with these accusations and his little witch hunt. He is just looking for any reason to accuse. If this were so cut and dried like he is claiming why has it gone on for days. Trust me the Mods are probably looking for ...

I was under the opinion that Mods were supposed to be impartial. Prehaps i am wrong about that as well. Not really sure that the above comment contributes to the discussion. If you aren't one of the Mods looking into this why express your opinion. If you are why are you making irresponsible biased ...

How do i see every game i have played with another member? Or see every game played between 2 or more other members?

Thanks

"these 2 obviously had secret diplomacy, or davmoho might be a multi of sevens"

yes your "evidence" is clear. If any mods are reading or following up on this could you lock down this thread as it is quickly turning into a "lets bash Seven" party by anyone who i might have beaten or is angry at me ...

I wont debate what is a matter of opinion. "And just one more time...the word slander means posts something untrue or made up." You are accusing me of a secret diplomacy and lying. In YOUR opinion you THINK what YOU did was NOT a suicide. You THINK that by handing you the game i could have cleared ...

Your opportunity to prove you wrong meant handing you the game on a silver platter. In light of your suicide on me and slanderous accusations towards me i decided not to hand you the game. You attack me and wipe out my bonus and leave me with 6 countries and then decide that in order to prove a ...