Page 1 of 1
ltennant[Cleared]e84

Posted:
Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:46 pm
by Caymanmew
Accused:
ltennantThe accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Game number(s):
all
Comments:nothing to back this up but i just have a odd feeling that he is to good for a new recruit
Re: ltennant

Posted:
Sat Jun 12, 2010 4:04 pm
by ltennant
Hmm, ban me before I get addicted

btw I'm not a new recruit anymore so your information is not up to date
Re: ltennant

Posted:
Sat Jun 12, 2010 8:26 pm
by jrl332005
It is quite possible that ltennant became very good at the board game before finding out about CC.
Re: ltennant

Posted:
Sat Jun 12, 2010 9:46 pm
by TheForgivenOne
jrl, for some reason, i want to put my 2 cents that this is one of Duality's multi's.
And just because your good at the board game, doesn't mean you will be good at CC.
You don't have Freestyle, FOW, Nuclear, or anything like that on the board game...
Re: ltennant

Posted:
Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:30 pm
by Army of GOD
Imagine freestyle on the board game....punches would be thrown.
Re: ltennant

Posted:
Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:34 pm
by TheForgivenOne
Aww, look hun, they are playing with both sides of the board
Re: ltennant

Posted:
Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:30 pm
by parker4s
Lols how would u do Freestyle fog? I bet you could only do it with colorblind people. But the game would be sooo confuzing.. and sooooo funny to watch.
Re: ltennant

Posted:
Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:47 am
by Caymanmew
parker4s wrote:Lols how would u do Freestyle fog? I bet you could only do it with colorblind people. But the game would be sooo confuzing.. and sooooo funny to watch.
i not trying to kill them i try to capture objective in normal map ya i seams weird
Re: ltennant

Posted:
Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:30 am
by eye84free
Looking into this at this time.
Eye84free
Re: ltennant[Pending]e84

Posted:
Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:45 am
by eddie2
its not dualty he has been busted after this player date i think so w2ould of been caught already
Re: ltennant[Pending]e84

Posted:
Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:34 am
by king sam
he is Cleared. This topic was made before the last one in which I told you to provide more evidence in your future claims, but it still remains. Next time please provide more insight into the accusation.