Accused: EVIL SEMP
The accused are suspected of: Biased review and suspected motive/friendship with AAFITZ
Comments: Please have a MOD other than EVIL SEMP review the accusations against me in thread (ponzi sevensociety secret diplomacy) as he has played 36 games with the accuser (AAFITZ) with most of them being doubles and triples games where they are TEAMMATES. I do not feel that Evil Semp approached his review with an unbiased opinion.
My case was marked NOTED and filed in my file despite there being NO evidence found and even stated as such in the thread by Evil SEMP. if there was no evidence found of a secret diplomacy I should have been cleared not NOTED. my thread is below..
viewtopic.php?f=239&t=130523\
ES might be a good and fair MOD overall however maybe not in this case because of the connection he has to the accuser. I am not making a statement against his reviewing skills as a whole, just asking for another C&A MOD review that thread because I believe EVIL SEMP's ability to review it has been compromised in light of this evidence. I think that the appearance of fairness is important and there should not be a conflict of interests when a MOD reviews a case.
EVIL SEMP review. Request another MOD review [closed]
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
- SevenSociety
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 10:19 pm
- Location: Highest rank: Brig / Highest ranking: 38 / Highest Score: 3374
EVIL SEMP review. Request another MOD review [closed]
Last edited by SevenSociety on Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: EVIL SEMP review. Request another MOD review
the hunters review every case together (i think) so who posts make no difference

Re: EVIL SEMP review. Request another MOD review
They've played 36 games together out of a total of over 15,600 games played eh? Damning evidence indeed.

Silvanus wrote:perch is a North Korean agent to infiltrate south Korean girls
- SevenSociety
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 10:19 pm
- Location: Highest rank: Brig / Highest ranking: 38 / Highest Score: 3374
Re: EVIL SEMP review. Request another MOD review
If they do review every case together that would be helpful to clarity.
- rdsrds2120
- Posts: 6274
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am
- Gender: Male
Re: EVIL SEMP review. Request another MOD review
Practically everything is 'noted'. It's always nice to have a convenient history of what goes on where without having to get a shovel out for the great forum middle earth.
-rd
-rd
- Victor Sullivan
- Posts: 6010
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Columbus, OH
- Contact:
Re: EVIL SEMP review. Request another MOD review
Yikes, disrespecting authority, tsk tsk. I think you're still a little heated from the report AAFitz filed. "NOTED" is hardly worth crying over anyways...
I read the thread (well, skimmed) and it seems like he made a fair ruling.
-Sully
I read the thread (well, skimmed) and it seems like he made a fair ruling.
-Sully
[player]Beckytheblondie[/player]: "Don't give us the dispatch, give us a mustache ride."
Scaling back on my CC involvement...
Scaling back on my CC involvement...
- Night Strike
- Posts: 8512
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: EVIL SEMP review. Request another MOD review
Secret diplomacy cases can be hard to prove, so the hunters note accusations in case new accusations come up in the future and they can see if a pattern emerges.
- king achilles
- Support Admin

- Posts: 13404
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: EVIL SEMP review. Request another MOD review
Your case was evaluated not only by him. If you can not accept how the ruling was given for the report about you, you have already gone through that avenue and I already replied to the ticket you sent earlier. No need for this thread anymore.


