Conquer Club

Cleared johnmark121 / LumberDave [ka]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

johnmark121 / LumberDave [ka]

Postby sutisuti on Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:57 pm

Accused:

johnmark121
LumberDave

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):
Game 15437506

They are also in playing together in 3 other games at the moment and looking at a history of their games they play together very often.

Comments:

There is something fishy going on between these 2. I am constantly being attacked by either one, which by itself is not anything wrong. This is a trench game, and i reached Libya and saw that Niger with only being defended with 1 (red holds all of Mahgreb). Lo and behold green was in Chad, also with 1 troop. Instead of attacking red, green chooses to attack other players including blue and yellow even though red has the most territories. They also rarely attack each other except it appears to gain hold of a bonus area.

This got my suspicions up, so then i see that these two frequently play together (including 3 other matches at the moment) and they have frequently played games together in the past.

As a suggestion, you should be prevented from joining a public game if it is detected that you are already involved in 2 public games with a player that is already in the game. that way secret alliances can be weeded out more easily. If you want to play with friends, thats fine, make a private game, and these games won't be counted towards the '2'.
Lieutenant sutisuti
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:44 pm

Re: johnmark121 / LumberDave

Postby Major.Bossman on Sat Mar 28, 2015 9:04 pm

From what I can see the accused have been in twenty-nine games together and thirteen of those they have played as one on one. However that could just point to the accused being friends or acquaintances. The problem with the secret diplomacy allegation is that without hard evidence such as wall posts, pm's, etc it will probably just be noted. While I have disagreements with your suggestion may I recommend putting it in the suggestion area as this forum section is not the proper area to discuss it.
Major Major.Bossman
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 8:41 pm
2

Re: johnmark121 / LumberDave

Postby king achilles on Sun Mar 29, 2015 8:36 pm

If you happen to share a border with an opponent with only one troop on each side, and you happen to have played games together in the past, from this point of view alone, does this equate to an automatic secret alliance? I can understand the suspicion, but as what has been said above, we'll need more than this.
User avatar
Lieutenant king achilles
Support Admin
Support Admin
 
Posts: 13361
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm

Re: johnmark121 / LumberDave [ka]

Postby king achilles on Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:51 pm

If no added evidence is provided, I will proceed in clearing this after 2 more days.

=============

- Cleared.
User avatar
Lieutenant king achilles
Support Admin
Support Admin
 
Posts: 13361
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm


Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users