Conquer Club

Accused:

dha.II
rich2810




The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy



Game number(s):

Game 4124562




Comments:

dha.II though owning vichy never attacked border green (rich) which left only 1 army in each bordering country with dha.II.owning france..
at least secret agrrement betwenn them is obvious...and maybe a multi though from diff countries..

Guderian09 wrote:Accused:
dha.II
rich2810

The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):
Game 4124562


Comments:
dha.II though owning vichy never attacked border green (rich) which left only 1 army in each bordering country with dha.II.owning france..
at least secret agrrement betwenn them is obvious...and maybe a multi though from diff countries..

I don't know why but your link to player dha.ll didn't work.. But this one does
dha.ll

I think its pretty safe to say that their not Multi's seeing as
dha.ll
Flag: Mexico

rich2810
Flag: Canada

And I am assuming the reason you are reporting them is for the following game chat:

Game 4124562 Chat wrote:2009-02-27 18:10:15 - Guderian09: I dont get it orange... u have an undeclared allliance with green?
2009-02-28 03:23:34 - dha.ll: no, but if I start a figth against orange, then yellow could take advantage and take me down
2009-02-28 03:32:11 - Blood Lord: But you r orange?What Gives sounds suspect
2009-03-01 16:52:35 - Guderian09: sry but thats so stupid I have to report u both ..it stinks ( huele)

Ive done this before, it can be an honest mistake to accidentally type the wrong color when responding to others in the chat.

Not to mention a quick game search will show you that this is the only game the 2 accused have been in together. It usually takes a little more evidence then just 1 game of 2 players doing each others bidding unless it is blatantly obvious to prove a unsaid secret alliance.

And for the record I don't see them doing each others bidding in this game, just a typo done by orange.

I do think that there was some secret diplomacy going on in this game though.

Game 4124562 Chat wrote:2009-02-06 19:14:07 - scottbryk: Agreeed Red.
2009-02-08 19:58:40 - Guderian09: what do u agree with red blue?
2009-02-08 19:58:53 - Guderian09: we are all dying to know...
2009-02-09 15:33:44 - rnunez: truce we blue
2009-02-09 16:44:22 - scottbryk: Red. In the future, if you are wanting to ask for more specific diplomatic arrangements you must make them in open discussion so everyone can see. I can't always guess what you are wanting to do. Please make everything public so all can see.

My bet is red (rnunez) sent blue (scottbryk) a PM requesting some sort of alliance and blue ponied up his agreement in chat. As soon as someone said something about it (you) he quickly defended himself by warning red(rnunez) to do all arrangements in chat. It goes on to, but this is enough to get the picture.

That theory would be more logical for secret alliance in this game. But this is my opinion, I am not a hunter, just trying to provide more insight on the given situation.

Best of Luck

King Sam

It would appear King Sam has said it all in this case. That game chat coming from dha.ll does not seem to hold enough ground to incriminate him and could be an honest mistake. Orange does not look like a multi with green and so far, this is also their first game played together.

As for rnunez and scottbryk, this game shall be noted for them.