Page 1 of 1

PONCHO1107 [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:03 pm
by KraphtOne
Accused:

PONCHO1107



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy


Game number(s):

Game 4670867




Comments: STARTED A 3 MAN GAME GREEN TOOK AUSSIE VERY STRONG VERY EARLY AND RED STARTED POUNDING ME IN NORTH AMERICA AND EUROPE... WHICH I THOUGHT WAS ODD THAT HE DIDNT EVEN TRY FOR THE SOUTH AMERICAN BONUS... GREEN WAS GETTING VERY LARGE AND TOOK ASIA AND STILL RED ONLY HIT ME... THEN I NOTICED THEY BOTH HAD CANADIAN FLAGS IN THEIR PROFILES AND STARTED TO PUT 2 AND 2 TOGETHER...

Re: PONCHO1107

PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:57 pm
by JCKing
Yes very weird that one would build while the other destroys the 3rd player. I would say these 2 know each other in real life obviously. Their actions warrant a block.

Re: PONCHO1107

PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:33 pm
by king sam
JCKing wrote:Yes very weird that one would build while the other destroys the 3rd player. I would say these 2 know each other in real life obviously. Their actions warrant a block.


I concur

All 6 attacks that Poncho1107 made on patthegreat came in round 8 after the other player (KraphtOne) was eliminated.

And 22 out of the 28 attacks that patthegreat made on Poncho1107 came in the same circumstances.

Seeing as there was no diplomatic discussion in chat, and by my reconstruction of the game patthegreat was never that dominant to warrant an understanding for the greater good I would definitely say there was an illegal diplomacy done here if not Multiple accounts.

The timing between turns is pretty close throughout the game, which could be coincidence. or could be a sign of a multi.

There is one other game, same settings that these 2 played together in (Game 4430347) which had the same outcome.
(Both did minimal attacks on each other until the other player was eliminated in this game as well)

Best of Luck,
King Sam

Re: PONCHO1107

PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:37 am
by king achilles
So far, they have played 2 games together, both won by patthegreat.

You both have a point. However, it still leaves room for doubt. We do not 'punish' people just because they didn't attack someone enough or because they attack someone else more. Otherwise, we would all be dictating everyone else on how they should play the game.

If you believe they had a secret diplomacy in your game, feel free to leave the appropriate ratings for them.

For now, we'll keep this noted.