Page 1 of 1

confx [cleared]

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:17 pm
by sirbutchy33
PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!

Replace or delete any xxxxxxx with the appropriate information.
Delete any accusations or entries which do not apply.

Be sure before you accuse someone!


Accused:

confx
korda1
xxxxxxx



The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy





Game number(s):

Game 4718893
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]



Comments:

Re: confx

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:38 pm
by Witt13
Just looking at this quickly, I doubt they know each other in real life. Not saying its impossible, but for one they are both from different countries (Korda1-Argentina and Confx-Portugal). Also this is their first game playing together.

To me this looks like they are just teaming up on the higher ranked player AND they have no idea what they are doing at the same time. (well green anyways) :D

Re: confx

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:00 am
by korda1
In this game there is no foul play at all. It is the first game I have played (i believe) with each of the players. As the game started out, both me and red attacked each other leaving Green to bloat and accumulate troops.

I think very little of ranks as some games you get beter rolls and others not. You can see I am a cook!!! and I play anybody regardsless of thier track record. I am afficionate of strategy board games and have enjoyed this experience since Ive joined only weeks ago. There is only one other person I know who plays the game and he is my brother who ives in the US (I live in Argentina).

I think sibutchy is a sore loser who was winning at one point and it is natural to attack the winning player....It has happened to me playing middle east and I did not complain. There have been no communications with the other player nor bad intentions agaisnt anyone.

Review the game logs well, I would say that it is only strategic to take advantage of a player who over attacked and left his countries without any troops to defend. Having red pretty much under control, why wouldn't I attack green? In any case I would be considered stupid if I didn't.

I think that an unfounded claim like this one only work in detriment to the game and players should not be alowed to blow the whistle just because they lose.

I hold nothing agaisnt sirbutchy and will certainly enjoy playing agaisnt him in the future.

Congratulations on the game.

P

Re: confx

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:10 pm
by JoshyBoy
Doubt it. They are just two low-ranked players who happen to find themselves in a game with a highly ranked player and therefore they both think he will be the biggest threat. Chat makes a good read though. :lol:

Re: confx

PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:08 am
by king achilles
Checking the game log, it was blue and red attacking each other first for a few rounds. Green was left untouched. Probably, when they noticed that green was getting strong, they attacked green. And the game chat sprung from here, which may have fueled the attack more.

This is cleared.

Re: confx

PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:47 am
by JoshyBoy
king achilles wrote:Checking the game log, it was blue and red attacking each other first for a few rounds. Green was left untouched. Probably, when they noticed that green was getting strong, they attacked green. And the game chat sprung from here, which may have fueled the attack more.

This is cleared.


Bravo! Job well done. End of story. =D>