Conquer Club

Accused:

jefjef
ronc8649




The accused are suspected of:


Other: baiting me



Comments: right now im am pissed off to the last damn straw with them they are baiting me to flame to attack them back at this link http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=92215&p=2121779#p2121779
i did responed once but this is damn rediculus oh and on the link it is a couple posts down till u get to it.... on second thought just read the whole damn page 3

Aww
He altered your quoted post after you flamed him. Poor you.

THE FOLLOWING IS NOT A COMPLAINT, THIS IS CHARACTER TESTIMONY

Everyone knows colton and I do not get along, however, I can state that he is cool and collected and has been provoked beyond a level any normal person should have to endure. It is the same gang of bad seeds: jetjef, Strife, Skittles, Woodsie, etc., as always.

The baiting has gone far over the top here. We need draconian corrective action against the bad seeds.

Re: not a multi

Postby colton24 on Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:59 pm

ronc8649 wrote:

colton24 wrote:and no im not a multi




i knew im an idiotic asshole



what the f*** you altered my post text on qoute........................................ It seems colton is guilty of what he accuses others of........ mmmmmmmmm

he flamed me first when i had and i qoute put this

i am not a multi

after he accused me of being one then put this

i am a multi go ahead bust me

or something like that and said

i knew it

which got under my skin ( of course so did the first one ) so i took the bait by mistake altering his text when i qouted him putting instead of i knew it i put " i knew im an idiotic asshole " then him and jef jef baited me altering my posts by quoting me and changing the text which REALLY PISSED ME OFF

jefjef wrote:Re: not a multi

Postby colton24 on Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:59 pm

ronc8649 wrote:

colton24 wrote:and no im not a multi




i knew im an idiotic asshole



what the f*** you altered my post text on qoute................ It seems he is guilty of what he accuses others of........ mmmmmmmmm

acctualy i mistakingly took the bait he laid out when he altered my text

i can bet you he is going to edit his post from what it was

jefjef wrote:Re: not a multi

Obviously a response to provocation is of a different ethical point than the initial provocation.

BAN ALL BAITERS

I love how you're still in the other thread swearing. I know you're only 10, but this is the internet kid, get over it and move on. It's called "growing up"

im 11 not 10 and bout 20 days from now im 12

saxitoxin wrote:

jefjef wrote:Re: not a multi

Obviously a response to provocation is of a different ethical point than the initial provocation.

BAN ALL BAITERS

Woodruff, do you ever sleep or are your self-appointed hall monitoring duties too intense? - Saxitoxin.... Well SAXI are you trying to ban yourself too? Your signature is a bait & an attack on woodruff.......... What have ye to say for yourself?

jefjef please get out of this topic im asking you nicely i dont want you or ronc to be in here

jefjef wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

jefjef wrote:Re: not a multi

Obviously a response to provocation is of a different ethical point than the initial provocation.

BAN ALL BAITERS

Woodruff, do you ever sleep or are your self-appointed hall monitoring duties too intense? - Saxitoxin.... Well SAXI are you trying to ban yourself too? Your signature is a bait & an attack on woodruff.......... What have ye to say for yourself?

A complaint has already been filed, investigated and dismissed after I provided context to that quote.

If you feel strongly about it you should file another one instead of attempting to hijack and derail this thread as part of a GANG OF 5 coordinated attack.

saxitoxin wrote:

jefjef wrote:Re: not a multi

Obviously a response to provocation is of a different ethical point than the initial provocation.

BAN ALL BAITERS

alright...cheating and abuse is for REAL abuse... you guys are spamming up c/a with your abusive spam.

if you are saying that this topic for me being baited doesn't belong here, where does it?

Forum ban coltron and saxi, and please if it hasn't been done already run an ip check on the symbiotic troll twins.

no i am saying that the members that are flaming/baiting and spamming need to stop.

BoganGod wrote:Forum ban coltron and saxi, and please if it hasn't been done already run an ip check on the symbiotic troll twins.

Likewise, I suggest the baiting brothers BoganGod and jefjef be banned and checked.

nah ill probably get a warning saxi on the other hand.......well ya know and go ahead on the IP check im sure two different people and two different houses wont have the same IP idk where he lives or who he is outside the game

clapper011 wrote:no i am saying that the members that are flaming/baiting and spamming need to stop.

ok thanks for the clarification

MODS - please lock this thread down to prevent further disruption from jefjef and BoganGod and the other 3 members of the Gang of 5 (who haven't received the attack signal yet, apparently).

i will second that lemme pm a mod that is on

crap only mods on are the TD mods

saxitoxin wrote:MODS - please lock this thread down to prevent further disruption from jefjef and BoganGod and the other 3 members of the Gang of 5 (who haven't received the attack signal yet, apparently).

I will lock this thread, but only to keep by all members further disruption of it as per the OP's request.

You do not need to create a C&A thread for every single violation of the Community Guidelines in the forums. The thread in question was a C&A thread and the entire thread was read through by a hunter before a decision was made on the case. If any punishments for posts were going to be meted out, they were or would have been at that time. If you think that a user is baiting or flaming within a post, report the post using the Report A Post feature which is coded into the php software. That would be the ! icon at the top right of a post. That being said, if a user is deemed to be abusing the Report A Post feature, they will also be warned. This thread is going to be marked [Closed] and will remain locked.