Moderator: Cartographers
daydream wrote:i would also go with koblenz. it seems all the umlauts have disappeared... are you aware that they are missing and will add them back in? do you know where, or should i write you a list?
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:Beautiful![]()
Ill get a run down on this one probably tomorrow. It'll give me something to look forward to.
ZeakCytho wrote:Excuse me while I drool for a little while.
I think the only thing I don't like are the mountains. I like the style, just, some of them are at really wacky angles. Mostly the ones with two peaks on the same "triangle." Also, the continent names being at crazy angles is a bit distracting. Is there any way to fit them in straight, or at less of an angle than...almost vertical, like Rheinhessen and Preussen are?
edbeard wrote:any chance of you 'stealing' fudowhatever's concept of having the colours of the continents match the flag of the country? (mexico map).
what I mean is you have all the colours, but you have them somewhat randomly in there. Instead you could have black at the top two regions, red in the middle and yellow on the bottom
pepperonibread wrote:ZeakCytho wrote:Excuse me while I drool for a little while.
I think the only thing I don't like are the mountains. I like the style, just, some of them are at really wacky angles. Mostly the ones with two peaks on the same "triangle." Also, the continent names being at crazy angles is a bit distracting. Is there any way to fit them in straight, or at less of an angle than...almost vertical, like Rheinhessen and Preussen are?
For the mountains, would "dulling" down the peaks help at all? I personally like them, but I'll see what I can do.
As for the continent names, I'm a little confused about what you mean. Are you saying you like Preussen and Rheinhessen, or you don't like them?
cairnswk wrote:i'd like to see the map with a randomization of the 88 digit armies all over it as it would appear in the start of a game...not just the yellow....and the small version as i fear that some of those areas will be very difficult to read on the small version, with that font.
and i agree with the mountains...IMHO they look too "Andy Cap style" and i have to be questioning the "snow on matterhorns" appearance in the middle of Germany...down near Swisse and Austria I could understand....but middle Germany (and yes i know that it snows in Germany) wouldn't they be more like rolling large mountains/hills rather than "Matterhorn peaks"
also...is that the Danube in there...what about the Rhine?
EDIT**
Pepperonibread...i forgot to say before I had to rush out to town, that the map is looking very good...just those couple of things caught my eye, but if they're of no consequence then i understand.
lord voldemort wrote:nice update...one thing i see strait up (thats not mentioned) the inlet river between Lubeck and Bremen is a lil hard to see i agree with wat cairns said about mountains..and the continent names thing that Zeak said..maybe smaller and added to mini map instead.
looks wicked though!!
iancanton wrote:amazingly, it appears that the long thin territories in norddeutschland are not too tight for the names to fit! nothing wrong with the bridges. good work on those and the colours too, although it does look odd that kiel and peninsular denmark are now an island. should we change the look of the canal between kiel and lübeck to make it much thinner and slightly different from the river, with a legend to say that rivers and the kiel canal are impassable (similar to the legend on the soviet union map)?
by the way, it's baden-württemberg, not baden-württemburg. can we also have mainz instead of pfalz, since every other mainland territory on the map is a city, whereas pfalz is a region?
ian.
ZeakCytho wrote:You might want to consider redoing your sig...it doesn't do the graphical quality of this map justice!
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Users browsing this forum: No registered users