Time(27) v The 4th Crusade (13)(Time win)(finished)

Posted:
Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:47 am
by eddie2
Re: Time v The 4th Crusade (under construction)

Posted:
Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:56 am
by eddie2
TheSaxlad wrote:t4c to win

18-12
rofl dreams are there 2 be broken
Re: Time v The 4th Crusade (under construction)

Posted:
Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:59 am
by Commander62890
TIME gets their first win, 23-17
Re: Time v The 4th Crusade (under construction)

Posted:
Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:10 am
by lord voldemort
TheSaxlad wrote:t4c to win

18-12
what about the other 10 games?
Re: Time v The 4th Crusade (under construction)

Posted:
Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:34 am
by TheSaxlad
lord voldemort wrote:TheSaxlad wrote:t4c to win

18-12
what about the other 10 games?
it was 30 games, lets split it up to...
24 - 16 T4C
Re: Time v The 4th Crusade (under construction)

Posted:
Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:29 am
by Leehar
10 doubles
10 trebles
10 quads
10 singles
= 30 games?
Re: Time v The 4th Crusade (under construction)

Posted:
Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:49 am
by eddie2
lol we had 2 increase 2 forty games 2 get the privs so saxlad wanted 10 singles
Re: Time v The 4th Crusade (under construction)

Posted:
Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:22 am
by VioIet
I see why sax.....lad was so busy now. Interesting

Re: Time v The 4th Crusade (under construction)

Posted:
Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:32 pm
by eddie2
times set 1.
doubles.
Game 7869905jamaica, eddie2 joshyboy
Game 7869918siege,metricsystem nattyniz
Game 7869926stalingradkitchen raider jasholz
Game 7869942feudal, lemonmonkey pirlo
Game 7869952poland, buddysystem ets45
Re: Time v The 4th Crusade (under construction)

Posted:
Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:50 am
by TheSaxlad
the first round could quite possibly end up 5-5...
Re: Time(3) v The 4th Crusade (4)(started)

Posted:
Sun Nov 07, 2010 2:23 am
by TheSaxlad
and what. is noone going to gun for the 4th crusade.
really.
Re: Time(3) v The 4th Crusade (4)(started)

Posted:
Sun Nov 07, 2010 3:43 pm
by BlackKnight_6
Yeah, I'm gonna gun for the t4c. I say t4c win 16-14.
Re: Time(3) v The 4th Crusade (4)(started)

Posted:
Sun Nov 07, 2010 3:52 pm
by eddie2
BlackKnight_6 wrote:Yeah, I'm gonna gun for the t4c. I say t4c win 16-14.
lol still waiting for them 2 give me week 2 games
Re: Time(10) v The 4th Crusade (8)(started)

Posted:
Sun Nov 21, 2010 6:14 am
by TheSaxlad
were not behind by much, 20 games to go, behind by 4.
Re: Time(10) v The 4th Crusade (8)(started)

Posted:
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:35 am
by eddie2
TheSaxlad wrote:were not behind by much, 20 games to go, behind by 4.
Yes it has been close but i can now concentrate on this war a bit more, now all games are done for the bofm war.
gl in last games saxlad.
Re: Time(10) v The 4th Crusade (8)(started)

Posted:
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:11 am
by Arama86n
Considering that half of t4c has less than 300 games completed(!), that they are only only behind 10-8 is very commendable. But as usual when there is a potential upset, it probably has more to do with the higher seeded clan not putting in as much effort/ taking it too seriously as they could.
All the same, well played T4C, keep at it.
Re: Time(10) v The 4th Crusade (8)(started)

Posted:
Sun Nov 21, 2010 9:12 am
by eddie2
Arama86n wrote:Considering that half of t4c has less than 300 games completed(!), that they are only only behind 10-8 is very commendable. But as usual when there is a potential upset, it probably has more to do with the higher seeded clan not putting in as much effort/ taking it too seriously as they could.
All the same, well played T4C, keep at it.
lol Arama86n time and T4c are even clans on the ranking i think the onlt difference is we have longer running cc members in our clan.