Page 1 of 3
the non flaming non trolling trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:58 pmby ronsizzle
this is a closed usergroup for people 18 and over.
there is no criteria to join except stating in this thread that you want in, and that you are 18 years or older.
i am looking for 3 other people to help head this up.
jefjef(in)-prowler-king herpes(in)
those are the three that i would like. if one of them doesnt want to, i will be looking for someone to take their place.
there is no limit for how many people can join this group. thank you.
this usergroup will be to simply let off steam about dice, gameplay, and other things.
ronc8649 co-leader
king_herpes co-leader
jefjef co-leader
theprowler co-leader
bogangodthe.killing.44e_i_pidnucciUncle DeathapeyArmy of GodSFX!#1 _stunnafookehHardAttackCommander62890CrazyirishmannagerousMr ChangshaartimisMeDeFelevcy_90thegreekdogflabiotruly_tasha
Re: flame wars usergroup
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:04 pmby King_Herpes
Well f*ck, let's give it a try.
Re: flame wars usergroup
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:05 pmby BoganGod
Suggest a rename to "The Flaming Trolls" sounds like fun.
Re: flame wars usergroup
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:08 pmby ronsizzle
BoganGod wrote:Suggest a rename to "The Flaming Trolls" sounds like fun.
handled.
Re: the flaming trolls
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:10 pmby the.killing.44
Haha, nice group, looks like fun.
Re: the flaming trolls
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:13 pmby jefjef
^$^^ @ bogus! IN
I would make a rule that to join one must agree that all flaming is tolerated and accepted and can't/won't be subject to complaints. ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK!
Re: the flaming trolls
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:14 pmby e_i_pi
Count me in
Re: the flaming trolls
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:32 pmby dnucci
IN. So, apparently you now have ONE member who isn't a total cocksucker.
Re: the flaming trolls
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:40 pmby jefjef
dnucci wrote:IN. So, apparently you now have ONE member who isn't a total cocksucker.
Mirrors are also required........
Re: the flaming trolls
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:48 pmby ronsizzle
lets try to keep it clean in here boys...
Re: the flaming trolls
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:14 pmby Uncle Death
I'm in.
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:59 pmby apey
well you know that i got to get me some of this action
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:51 pmby Army of GOD
Hm. Seems interesting. I'm in.
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:28 pmby SFX!
Oh goodie! Calm down boiis! I'm joining!
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:32 pmby #1_stunna
in.
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 5:06 pmby fookeh
in
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 5:08 pmby ronsizzle
updated as of 6:07 e.s.t.
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:23 pmby HardAttack
In please
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:49 pmby Commander62890
iN
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:13 pmby Strife
This list is rather lacking. I would like to see b.k., dm, daz, and jim in here. Otherwise it just won't fit up to par. Tsk tsk.
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:38 pmby ronsizzle
Strife wrote:This list is rather lacking. I would like to see b.k., dm, daz, and jim in here. Otherwise it just won't fit up to par. Tsk tsk.
thanks strife, your application has been thrown away. please dont troll the trollers thread.
and being that this thread is less than 7 and a half hrs old, i appreciate your concern.
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:42 pmby Strife
ronc8649 wrote:Strife wrote:This list is rather lacking. I would like to see b.k., dm, daz, and jim in here. Otherwise it just won't fit up to par. Tsk tsk.
thanks strife, your application has been thrown away. please dont troll the trollers thread.
and being that this thread is less than 7 and a half hrs old, i appreciate your concern.
Too bad I didn't apply. Now put your club away or beat in another direction.
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:46 pmby ronsizzle
Strife wrote:ronc8649 wrote:Strife wrote:This list is rather lacking. I would like to see b.k., dm, daz, and jim in here. Otherwise it just won't fit up to par. Tsk tsk.
thanks strife, your application has been thrown away. please dont troll the trollers thread.
and being that this thread is less than 7 and a half hrs old, i appreciate your concern.
Too bad I didn't apply. Now put your club away or beat in another direction.
strife, i am not sure of your intentions other than derailing this thread with names of banned users, and the likes of barunt? if you hold him up high, then you might want to reconsider your formula that you use to evaluate posters.
it seems that posers is more what you are looking for?
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:17 pmby ronsizzle
22:17:10 ‹nagerous› sign me up ronc
Re: the flaming trolls (social)(forming)
Posted:
Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:51 pmby Nola_Lifer
