Page 1 of 1

Equality

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:10 am
by KristianMD
Well I think that there is just to many things that depend on luck. Somebody can lose 7 armies on taking 1 army, while others take 7 armies with only 2 armies...

Basically I thought that the dice and the cards can be fixed (the same dice would fall the same to the both players, and both players would get the same colour). That would mean that the players would depend on their skill instead of their luck to win the game. Besides a lot of people quit the game because they get this incredible "luck" so that is another reason why it should be done.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:15 am
by papadopo
making battle using dice/luck is part of the game. For 100% strategy play chess

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:18 am
by Fieryo
you're implying taking the risk (and thus the fun) out of the game.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:15 pm
by Kemmler
The game's called RISK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:47 am
by KristianMD
Kemmler wrote:The game's called RISK


you would still be risking ;)
It`s just very annoying when you lose armies like people lose hair... While the other guy gets everything without even losing an army... it`s only fair that you have the same opertunity. That way you would need skill to win a game, not just blind luck.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:16 am
by owyn999
The skill you use will 9 times out of 10 win you the game, yes there are a few and when I say few, I mean very few, times when it is the dice that win or lose the game for you.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:29 am
by Lone.prophet
go play chess or a video game than

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:33 pm
by Kemmler
owyn999 wrote:The skill you use will 9 times out of 10 win you the game, yes there are a few and when I say few, I mean very few, times when it is the dice that win or lose the game for you.


I disagree, I've often beaten much higher players due to deployment or luck