unfair moderation!

[wicked]

Well since we're going to be doing away with the current feedback system shortly, I suggest you both let it go. See the thread at the top of this forum for details.

[mandalorian2298]

You bunch of morons and ass lickers are missing the point.

true he won the game later on in the game, but his win was at risk after his lame move on me.
he won the game because a players made a serious mistake and NOT because he half killed me offering my 5 cards to another player... GOT THAT WISE GUYS?

I think that you should resolve this in the way it's usually resolved in kung fu movies: Start your own "School of losing by doing the math". I suggest that you start it in Landgrab and sate their thirst for tactical wisdom.

[JOHNNYROCKET24]

OK then, time for my response you idiot.

First off - the neg you left me.

Your version of events was:

"Attempted to eliminate 29 of my armies all spread with 25, killed 9"

I had 6 armies on Quebec, 6 on Ural and 6 on Siberia. Handed in a set for 20 armies, got a bonus of 2 on Siberia plus 3 for my go. That equals 43 attacking armies, numb nuts.
1st. If I'm not allowed to attack someone holding 4 cards with a decent amount of armies, then please explain when I should attack someone?
2nd. If I stop after removing just 9 armies, is this sufficiently bad play to warrant a negative?

Here is a sample of in game chat from the game in question...
2008-05-26 21:34:06 - General K: STOP IT RED YOU DONT HAVE ENOUGH IDIOT
2008-05-26 21:34:39 - General K: YOU ARE GETTING A NEGATIVE ON THAT LAME ATTEMPT
2008-05-26 21:35:21 - Pedronicus: i stopped before i gave it away
2008-05-26 21:35:39 - General K: I lost 9 armies meanwhile
2008-05-26 21:36:48 - Pedronicus: you should stop playing this game mate.
2008-05-26 21:37:31 - General K: no you should stop playing like a fucktard
2008-05-26 21:38:20 - Pedronicus: So are you really going to give me a negative for taking 9 armies off of you?
2008-05-26 21:38:54 - General K: for killing 9 and making my death easy for blue YES
2008-05-26 21:43:04 - General K: and have the decency to apologize next time, to me and to the other players since you fucked them as well
2008-05-26 21:49:52 - General K: I have zero tolerance for bad play Red. one more shit move like that and I put you on my ignore list I swear it!
2008-05-26 21:50:47 - Pedronicus: don't bother - I'm sick of your in game moaning. Your going on mine.

As you can see General K is a very polite person....

Now onto negative feedback left for other players:

Negative Round 1 he kills 6 armies of mine... his dice worked but it was a high risk move that could have crippled both of us, beware of his unpredictable unreasonable moves..

Negative Half killed me in that game, giving my 4 cards away to another player. joined my ignore list!

Negative did a shameful move by hitting me in order to forbid me from winning. He thought that hitting me was wise but he didn't take into consideration that next turn another player kills me since I was weak, takes my cards and goes for the win! after a lame move like that I wont trust playing with him anymore!

Negative another cheap move, offering the game to another player out of despair, screwing me from getting a sure win. not a honorable move at all, this guy wont be playing with me anymore!

Negative terrible move in this game, gave the game away after a shortsighted hit! plan your path better next time.

Negative poor play in that game... he smashed my entire armies simply because he didn't realize that 1: he didn't have enough to eliminate, 2 - there was another player easier to eliminate but missed him, 3 - I cashed and placed on the map 2 minutes before he started moving but he said he was colorblind and missed it!!! be careful when playing with him...

Negative did a very bad move in eliminating at early stage, for 2 cards when the cash was still 4, and to only remain weak with few armies.

(The above is just a small sample of what he leaves negative feedback for)

and on it goes....
Loads of negative feedback left by him regarding bad moves. Jesus Christ! - It's a game played by humans, and humans make mistakes. Maybe if you just accepted that from time to time people make mistakes and got on with your next game like everyone else does, instead of throwing negatives around like confetti, you wouldn't have so many retaliatory negatives against your name.

If you want to play a game with no flaws, play chess against Deep Blue.

Also do us all a favour and leave this site.

LOL !!!

you left me negative feedback because I tried to eliminate you and failed and now the shoe is on the other foot and your complaining about the guy that left you one.....oh the irony.

[owenshooter]

LOL !!!

you left me negative feedback because I tried to eliminate you and failed and now the shoe is on the other foot and your complaining about the guy that left you one.....oh the irony.

what? he didn't hit your ignore? shocker... but thanks for that comment, makes his complaint all the more hilarious!!!-0

[Pedronicus]

LOL !!!

you left me negative feedback because I tried to eliminate you and failed and now the shoe is on the other foot and your complaining about the guy that left you one.....oh the irony.

I left you a negative because you attacked me and if you had killed me, fair enough, but you attacked me so that if you failed (which you were very likely to do) you would of given that game to your regular doubles partner, which you did.
And that I consider cheating.

The negative I received was for taking 9 armies off of General K, which is totally different

[JOHNNYROCKET24]

LOL !!!

you left me negative feedback because I tried to eliminate you and failed and now the shoe is on the other foot and your complaining about the guy that left you one.....oh the irony.

I left you a negative because you attacked me and if you had killed me, fair enough, but you attacked me so that if you failed (which you were very likely to do) you would of given that game to your regular doubles partner, which you did.
And that I consider cheating.

The negative I received was for taking 9 armies off of General K, which is totally different

reguardless, your feedback was bullshit. leaving feedback because a player tried to eliminate you and lost is pathetic and weak and makes you look rediculous. how many other players left me feedback stating the same thing you have? NONE. A total of 9,000 games and nobody but you complained about it. Thats what happens on escalating cards and everyone knows it. I guess you never tried to eliminate someone and fall short? Not the mighty Pedro. that never happened to him. your a joke and now your on here complaining about feedback that someone left you about moves they dint like. you got balls.

[gloryordeath]

Enough guys. This isn't Flame Wars.

[Johnny Rockets]

Not quite flaming really. More of a debate of perspective, double standards and opinions. Wicked will bump it there if she wants, rent-a-cop.

Johnny Rocket Fingers

[wacicha]

Not quite flaming really. More of a debate of perspective, double standards and opinions. Wicked will bump it there if she wants, rent-a-cop.

Johnny Rocket Fingers

If it was done w/out the vulgarity then I would agree. But this is getting very close to me sending it far far away to a place I never visit

[Pedronicus]

Send it far far away. I don't mind.
I've not flamed JR in any shape or form. As Johnny Rockets put it; More of a debate of perspective, double standards and opinions.

[wacicha]

to all just keep it uumm clean.



I have known you Pedro, for a long time. Thank you sir, for not making this a flame war issue