Moderator: Community Team
Donkey wrote:Here's my opinion...
I think clickys give an unfair advantage to those that use them, and allow for inflated scores to those that master them. I would say that if you can get good with clickys, you can almost make it to whatever rank you want... Regardless of your skill/strategy.
I wish there was a way for these people to be ranked separately from those of us who don't play this style. I would have a bunch more respect for the top 5/10 players on the scoreboard if that was the case.
FabledIntegral wrote:Donkey wrote:FabledIntegral wrote:I disagree with it being an unfair advantage because anyone really can get them
Sure, anyone can get them, but does everyone that plays know about them? I doubt it. I think if even one player playing in a speed game isn't using or can't use (not allowed to run it on their comp for whatever reason) clickys then those that are using them have an unfair advantage.
Hardly - not everyone knows about strategy in this game either. The simple fact of people not knowing about them hardly legitimizes not using them when they are easy to find in the forums. If you want to use computer limitations, let's bitch about those who have poor connection with CC. Therefore freestyle speed games should not be allowed in the first place because some have an advantage over other people's computers!
OliverFA wrote:FabledIntegral wrote:I disagree with it being an unfair advantage because anyone really can get them - what's the difference between someone being faster than someone else with the drop down menus?
Personally I wouldn't care too much if clickies were banned - I might stay at Colonel instead of Brigadier but you're utterly friggin' ridiculous to even insinuate that you can trash strategy down the game. I see multiple people using clickies but I'd say I'm better than a great deal because they still can't see the board (and there are those slower than me that can read it even better than me).
IMHO, clicking very fast is not stategy, that's another kind of skill.
Most times the winner is not the smartest player, but the fastest one.
Scott-Land wrote:Let's face it- those players you speak of Donkey, more times than not couldn't win with CM. A lot of the better players couldn't beat me using it against me. Let's discuss those players that you think are being highly affected by not using it.
Like any other games, you have the top players that win the majority of the games- in turn we swap the points among us. The top players that didn't use CM, like myself, were the ones that didn't benefit from the add-on. It was my choice not to play with it, my own stupidity to be at a [disadvantage]. When I finally decided to use it- it's because I simply could not keep up with the speed.
Now to the real point of this post. It's not those players you're concerned with, CM is the reason you think some players are reaching the top of the scoreboard- undeservedly.Donkey wrote:Here's my opinion...
I think clickys give an unfair advantage to those that use them, and allow for inflated scores to those that master them. I would say that if you can get good with clickys, you can almost make it to whatever rank you want... Regardless of your skill/strategy.
I wish there was a way for these people to be ranked separately from those of us who don't play this style. I would have a bunch more respect for the top 5/10 players on the scoreboard if that was the case.
If you remove CM, how does it change the scoreboard? The top players will still win as all of them use CM to level the speed factor. Remove it, it's level again. If it does anything, the better players using it will bring the skill factor back into the game. And in turn, those with speed only will not be able to maintain their rank. Brings us to the next point. It's now not CM that's the problem, it's speed freestyle? Perhaps we should make a thread about how unfair that game type is?
Let's hear your justification for your opinion. Take those 5-10 players at the top, and break their games down to see what you actually don't respect about their methods. Perhaps while you're at it, you could enlighten us on what type of player deserves your respect.
Hotdoggie wrote:
It would be different cos' the lower ranked players who join the 8 player classic frees and such dont have CM so they are just dumping points into the game for one of the people who do to take.
RashidJelzin wrote:SCOTT IS SUCH A NOOB! ONLY RANKED 5 CAUSE HE'S FASTER THAN A FUCKING PIG ON CRACK!
Donkey wrote:Before speed games came around, these were the players at the top of the scoreboard. They had to fight tooth and nail for every single point that they got
Donkey wrote: For the record, I would put your skills up against Greyās any day, and I would bet that he would beat you 60-70% of the time. I would also put my skills up against you, but I would bet weād be about 50/50.
Donkey wrote:I say that because before the speed game revolution you were a 2000-2500 point player with decent skills
Donkey wrote: I think those players at the top would slowly start losing points. All of the players in the speed games they play in would have the same tools, so the CM advantage wouldnāt be there⦠A noob might even have a chance now and then.
poo-maker wrote: I do understand how people could see that as unfair, but I just look at it as people not being obsessed enough in CC to go through every thread in the forums.... i.e THEIR FAULT
Donkey wrote:Thereās no doubt youāre a good player, poo, and I apologize for going off topic.poo-maker wrote: I do understand how people could see that as unfair, but I just look at it as people not being obsessed enough in CC to go through every thread in the forums.... i.e THEIR FAULT
I don't agree. I think all a CC player should need to have a fair fight in any game is a username and a password.
Bruceswar wrote:Donkey wrote:Thereās no doubt youāre a good player, poo, and I apologize for going off topic.poo-maker wrote: I do understand how people could see that as unfair, but I just look at it as people not being obsessed enough in CC to go through every thread in the forums.... i.e THEIR FAULT
I don't agree. I think all a CC player should need to have a fair fight in any game is a username and a password.
That would be like saying any golfer should have the same chance as Tiger Woods on a golf course using the same clubs. Both of these golfers could be great at the game, yet one chooses to lift weights (Woods) and one chooses to eat hamburgers (Daily). We see where Daily has gone vs Woods. Daily was once of the top players in the game, and now he is marginal. If he wants to survive he might wanna hit the weights. Seems to work well for Tiger. Point being is that Tiger is using his game knowledge coupled with the addition of weight lifting to make him better. As the old saying goes... "Knowledge is power" Use what you know and use it well to win. Addons if you ask me are part of the knowledge. Some help you with speed(CM) while others keep you from having to do simple math (BOB) Personally. I find that CM, yes I installed it, is good for casual games to help me speed up the moves I need to make. Takes less time. I used to spend up to an hour sometimes making all my moves. I can do it in much less time now. Being a regular to Speed 8 Man Freestyle games. It surely has changed the landscape, but I think everybody who frequents them has adapted. For those who play once in a blue moon it is not a big issue as pre CM they were still about the same . Win wise. They win once in a blue moon, for the simple fact they do not get it most of the time.
kratos644 wrote:and BOB is great. Do you really want to count every territory to see how much your opponent is going to get when you can have an addon do it for you instead? I know I wouldn't. It helps to strategize and see how many armies you have in relation to your opponent and territories etc. etc.
Donkey wrote:I think all a CC player should need to have a fair fight in any game is a username and a password.
Donkey wrote:CM's = Knowledge?
Forgive me if I have a tough time wrapping my head around that one...
Scott-Land wrote:I too have been railing games that I'm not in- if anything, I think CM has helped the [noobs]. Using the same point the anti-CM players use on why discontinuing the use of the script, the unfair advantage you speak of- is really in fact allowing them to win more games.
Let's say that I agree that mouse click and [timing] is indeed the overall reason for winning games, doesn't that mean that skill and strategy has taken a back seat to speed ? If so, the lower ranks obviously lack skill therefore wouldn't that mean it has allowed them to replace it with speed to win more games- to win games where drop downs would ensure their defeat? As far as I'm concerned, you're proving to me it requires less skill to win ... which means it does indeed benefit the lesser skilled, ie- low ranks. If anything, it's hurts players with sound strategy playing those games- ie high ranks.
Donkey wrote:Scott-Land wrote:I too have been railing games that I'm not in- if anything, I think CM has helped the [noobs]. Using the same point the anti-CM players use on why discontinuing the use of the script, the unfair advantage you speak of- is really in fact allowing them to win more games.
Let's say that I agree that mouse click and [timing] is indeed the overall reason for winning games, doesn't that mean that skill and strategy has taken a back seat to speed ? If so, the lower ranks obviously lack skill therefore wouldn't that mean it has allowed them to replace it with speed to win more games- to win games where drop downs would ensure their defeat? As far as I'm concerned, you're proving to me it requires less skill to win ... which means it does indeed benefit the lesser skilled, ie- low ranks. If anything, it's hurts players with sound strategy playing those games- ie high ranks.
All of that would be true if all noobs had CM's, but not all noobs know to search through the forums to find add-ons. If something was included in the confirmation e-mail that goes out when you first sign up telling them about these add-ons, and that they would be at a disadvantage in certain games without them... I wouldn't see a problem.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users