
Moderator: Community Team
Bruceswar wrote: I enjoy playing all types of ranks.
hermanitor wrote:Bruceswar wrote: I enjoy playing all types of ranks.
And losing!
Bruceswar wrote:IF you think high ranked players only play team games or 1 vs 1 or private games. Well some of us out there play public games. I offer my games open to anybody. Search my name for games waiting and I have a few open to join. Usally about 10 waiting and many playing. Come join a few.I enjoy playing all types of ranks.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Bruceswar wrote:IF you think high ranked players only play team games or 1 vs 1 or private games. Well some of us out there play public games. I offer my games open to anybody. Search my name for games waiting and I have a few open to join. Usally about 10 waiting and many playing. Come join a few.I enjoy playing all types of ranks.
Personally, I think those who complain are just trying to find yet another excuse for why they can't get the rank they feel they "should" have ... after all, it cannot POSSIBLY be lack of skill, could it?
Anyway, I more or less avoid you with who are Majors or above, except on a couple of boards (the realms ones, for example) where I feel I can hold my own, because I know you folks are quite a bit better than I. Not always ... the way to learn is to play those who are better, but it can be hard to learn if the games end too quickly.
kletka wrote:Bruces, who told you you are high rankedwith 2600
![]()
I think guys starting with Blitzaholic are really high ranked...
kletka wrote:
Yeah, and how about challenging my best buddy benjij for a series of ten 1v1 classic sequential no-cards games? Tell me when you start: I want to watch.
Bruceswar wrote: Well it has been said per a few other threads that anybody over 2000 never plays public games unless they are team games, or 1 vs 1 against some beginner.
kletka wrote:Bruceswar wrote: Well it has been said per a few other threads that anybody over 2000 never plays public games unless they are team games, or 1 vs 1 against some beginner.
What a pile of crapHowever, better ranked players would be selective about the games they play. For instance, I would not do sequential 1v1 against low ranks, or I would not do doodle assassin...
Bruceswar wrote:For whatever it is worth I never claimed to be a "high ranked player" but many have deemed us as such.
owenshooter wrote:Bruceswar wrote:For whatever it is worth I never claimed to be a "high ranked player" but many have deemed us as such.
"deemed"? are you sure you weren't anointed as such, during your coronation ceremony?-0
Bruceswar wrote:owenshooter wrote:Bruceswar wrote:For whatever it is worth I never claimed to be a "high ranked player" but many have deemed us as such.
"deemed"? are you sure you weren't anointed as such, during your coronation ceremony?-0
Nope I still think I suck.Well not totally but I miss a lot of plays. Yuk!
Sentinel XIV wrote:I've noticed plenty of players that play games such as 8-player escalating games on the Classic map. Scott-Land and the like are out there playing good games.
herndawg wrote:ditto to the public games, I have been almost all public games from when I was cadet to crappy playin major. Going up in rank has slowwwwed a bit getting less and less for kills, and the tourneys I am up in now with some good players that are keeping me in check big time. I will hold to my preference to be a "public terminator 8 player sequential host with a bloody red dot on his back herndawg that seems to stray from classic more and more guy". 2000 points is a nice landmark for rank it seems, I am a bigger target at the same time as seeming to be a bigger threat, but we all know better that that. no threat here, just let me hang out for 6 rounds pinging ones.
RashidJelzin wrote:You have a abashing desire to share your thoughts with everyone, Bruceswar-- 5 topics in the General Discussion part of the forum in the past week alone.
You care way too much about your points/rank-- who gives a crap, really. Almost all of your threads are about "high ranks" discussing issues they have with "low ranks". With you, being one of the high ranks of course-- you seem to think that a high rank automatically makes you a good player. Oh well.
I see this said, all the time, but how far up does someone have to be to be considered "high-ranked"? Anyone over 1600 or so is in the top 10%. the lowest ranked colonel is in the top 0.7%.Wild_Tiger wrote:major isnt a high rank imho
Fruitcake wrote:RashidJelzin wrote:You have a abashing desire to share your thoughts with everyone, Bruceswar-- 5 topics in the General Discussion part of the forum in the past week alone.
You care way too much about your points/rank-- who gives a crap, really. Almost all of your threads are about "high ranks" discussing issues they have with "low ranks". With you, being one of the high ranks of course-- you seem to think that a high rank automatically makes you a good player. Oh well.
ooooh...handbags at dawn
RashidJelzin wrote:You have a abashing desire to share your thoughts with everyone, Bruceswar-- 5 topics in the General Discussion part of the forum in the past week alone.
You care way too much about your points/rank-- who gives a crap, really. Almost all of your threads are about "high ranks" discussing issues they have with "low ranks". With you, being one of the high ranks of course-- you seem to think that a high rank automatically makes you a good player. Oh well.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users