Moderator: Community Team
poo-maker wrote:That sucks tom. Is cc really powerless in stopping people that have been banned?
Draconian_Intel wrote:No, they're not powerless. They could charge $25 for everyone.
comic boy wrote:Firstly I think the whole multi thing has got completely out of hand, secondly Im sorry Tom but you deserved to be bitten for noob farming, that also does nothing for the dignity of this site.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
comic boy wrote:Firstly I think the whole multi thing has got completely out of hand, secondly Im sorry Tom but you deserved to be bitten for noob farming, that also does nothing for the dignity of this site.
yeti_c wrote:comic boy wrote:Firstly I think the whole multi thing has got completely out of hand, secondly Im sorry Tom but you deserved to be bitten for noob farming, that also does nothing for the dignity of this site.
I think that's a bit unfair... I just ran a Map Rank on t-o-m... and he came out as...
Equalitarian (1.020)
Which means that he actually plays people that are slightly above his rank.
Although - t-o-m's admission of the fact is proof enough,
C.
t-o-m wrote:yeti_c wrote:comic boy wrote:Firstly I think the whole multi thing has got completely out of hand, secondly Im sorry Tom but you deserved to be bitten for noob farming, that also does nothing for the dignity of this site.
I think that's a bit unfair... I just ran a Map Rank on t-o-m... and he came out as...
Equalitarian (1.020)
Which means that he actually plays people that are slightly above his rank.
Although - t-o-m's admission of the fact is proof enough,
C.
Thanks yeti
Although i dont do noob farming on 1v1, but i just saw the game and joined.
If you map rank me on 1v1 games (casual) its:
Private 1st Class62 +38 Won 57 from 95(60%)
that's pretty average isnt it?
and if you map rank me on everyhting but 1v1 (on casual), you'll see that most of my points dont come from 1v1.
Sergeant 1st Class81 +519
comic boy wrote:
Yeh I wasnt particularly getting at you Tom because I know many others are a great deal worse, just wish that a lot more of the noobs bit back thats all.
MeDeFe wrote:So what's this about lack banning people he doesn't like?
Prankcall wrote:He paid for most of those accounts however.I think it un-fair to ban people that pay unless its clear they are using accounts in conjunction to gain points.I myself do not care if some1 chose to make and pay for 10 accounts as long as they are not cheating to gain points. While people complain all on this site about it being a point issue they will always have that conversation to cry about.Everybody protects their points in different manners.Some noob farm some play only private games (for the better game I'm sure they say).Anyhow I'd personally like to see some kind of refund credited to his account as he paid for a great number of those said created accounts to be able to play/use a service for a full year yet he wasnt able to do so.All said I guess this is ultimately Lacks site and he can do whatever he likes or thinks is best for HIS site.
Timminz wrote:Another reason he would start new accounts is to get around the foe list. He's a foul-mouthed child, who had very little skill in most styles of games, and always managed to get 'foed' by a lot of players. He'd get sick of not being able to play against all those people, and just start a new account so he could join their games again.
t-o-m wrote:Timminz wrote:Another reason he would start new accounts is to get around the foe list. He's a foul-mouthed child, who had very little skill in most styles of games, and always managed to get 'foed' by a lot of players. He'd get sick of not being able to play against all those people, and just start a new account so he could join their games again.
I have no idea how you can say that.
I think you should withdraw that little comment until you have seen some of his games.
He is extremely talented at the game types he plays, and i think that you are making that comment more because you dont like the guy, rather than the fact that he is good or not.
t-o-m wrote:Timminz wrote:Another reason he would start new accounts is to get around the foe list. He's a foul-mouthed child, who had very little skill in most styles of games, and always managed to get 'foed' by a lot of players. He'd get sick of not being able to play against all those people, and just start a new account so he could join their games again.
I have no idea how you can say that.
I think you should withdraw that little comment until you have seen some of his games.
He is extremely talented at the game types he plays, and i think that you are making that comment more because you dont like the guy, rather than the fact that he is good or not.
manimal was a horrible seq player thats why he was only really playing freestyle
I mean just look at thisthis is his freestyle stats
hes a general
Totals72 General943 +2557 Won 594 from 1456(41%) Won 229 from 446 717 (24) Serial Killer (58%)1389 Equalitarian (0.942)
then look at seq I think him having adhd made him a bad seq player since he was always hurrying
Totals32 Cook1332 -1532 Won 185 from
so I agree tim he was lacking skill at seq
but you can not say someone who is a general in freestyle is bad overall
t-o-m wrote:This is from mani, he wanted me to post this:manimal was a horrible seq player thats why he was only really playing freestyle
I mean just look at thisthis is his freestyle stats
hes a general
Totals72 General943 +2557 Won 594 from 1456(41%) Won 229 from 446 717 (24) Serial Killer (58%)1389 Equalitarian (0.942)
then look at seq I think him having adhd made him a bad seq player since he was always hurrying
Totals32 Cook1332 -1532 Won 185 from
so I agree tim he was lacking skill at seq
but you can not say someone who is a general in freestyle is bad overall
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users