suggs wrote:jiminski wrote:Scott-Land wrote:
Surely you can't ride both sides of the fence?
heheh i am really hoping Suggsy can't resist a double intender.
I am too gay.
hehee
Moderator: Community Team
suggs wrote:jiminski wrote:Scott-Land wrote:
Surely you can't ride both sides of the fence?
heheh i am really hoping Suggsy can't resist a double intender.
I am too gay.
suggs wrote:jiminski wrote:Scott-Land wrote:
Surely you can't ride both sides of the fence?
heheh i am really hoping Suggsy can't resist a double intender.
I am too gay.
yeti_c wrote:suggs wrote:Fair point, Twill barely said anything of substance.
Until he quite clearly and openly reveals the EXACT nature of why wicked was fired, I'm afraid he is guilty.
He must go.
And you're assuming that the disgruntled ex employee told you exactly what happened to the letter and without a single lie?!
C.
wicked wrote:Perhaps some type of community-voted/driven group (board of directors for lack of better term?) would be beneficial? They could be the voice of the community and hold twill accountable, since lack rarely has the time (or desire) to police him. But more importantly, they could be the voice of the community here and a liason for communications purposes. I dunno, just thinking off the top of my head here.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Well that's not what you said the first time you replied to it; but sure, why not change your stance now?qeee1 wrote: whether a paraphrase of likely dialogue or a reconstruction of past dialogue, it's irrelevant, as it's still wrong.
Oh "Puhlease".qeee1 wrote:2. that claiming that the site could be improved through democratic consultation prior to mods being fired is silly- this you ignored
Smug though you may feel about your pedantic insistence on having people paraphrase you in tedious detail; nobody was ever seriously arguing against you on that point, so your making it was (1) irrelevant, and (2) self-evident.
qeee1 wrote:We don't have any rights man. There's nothing we can do.
suggs wrote:Yeah, but we ought to have more rights. After all, isn't this place supposed to be about making a good experience for us?
qeee1 wrote:Well no, in certain situations those rights are not viable (example)
I can assure you that I too am cut deeply by such things. So don't worry, we can suffer together.qeee1 wrote:Also stop saying mean things, that really hurts.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
wicked wrote:sorry Rashid, was just trying to brainstorm ideas to get the community-driven site (as defined by admins) more community driven. maybe not the best idea, but certainly a talking point. And if telling the truth smears twill, then so be it. I've no loyalty to him, I no longer have to publicly support him. All I'm doing is telling my story.
qeee1 wrote:As for democratic accountability, you can't expect the admins to disclose everything to you, nor can you expect every decision to be a popular one. In this case I've yet to be convinced of a problem, although it does sound like there are problems in other areas, as wicked pointed out.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Frop wrote:wicked wrote:sorry Rashid, was just trying to brainstorm ideas to get the community-driven site (as defined by admins) more community driven. maybe not the best idea, but certainly a talking point. And if telling the truth smears twill, then so be it. I've no loyalty to him, I no longer have to publicly support him. All I'm doing is telling my story.
A couple of links for you that will come in handy... fact and opinion.
wicked wrote:quee, I wasn't talking specifically about mod dismissal, but in general.
re: the feedback. I posted a thread awhile back asking for community input about what they wanted out of a feedback system. The purpose was to get input as we worked on redesigning the system. At the time, I oversaw the feedback dept. and handled escalated/appealed feedback complaints, so I saw no problem in starting the discussion to gather input since it was my area (It would be like gimil starting a discussion about maps). After all, we were redesigning it for you all so you all should be involved in the process. So I made a thread, organized it, stickied it, and compiled the info as it came in. Lack thanked me for starting the thread, but Twill threw a hissy fit being the control freak that he is because it didn't go "through him". Twill's idea was to come up with a new system first, w/o any input from you guys, and only then throw it out for comments (I found this out after I made the thread). While that may have worked, I find it's more efficient for some things to get input at the beginning of the planning stages, rather than at the end.
wicked wrote:yeti_c wrote:Comments like this are a good way to state your case...
Some of your other comments have seemed very childish - which really is beneath you Wicked.
C.
<mod edit>that's confidential<mod edit>
Everything I've said has been the truth, in the interest of getting the information out there.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:wicked wrote:yeti_c wrote:Comments like this are a good way to state your case...
Some of your other comments have seemed very childish - which really is beneath you Wicked.
C.
<mod edit>that's confidential<mod edit>
Everything I've said has been the truth, in the interest of getting the information out there.
Did I miss something?
calv1n wrote:=D>
![]()
![]()
The1exile wrote:suggs wrote:something rotten in this fair kingdom
Denmark?
danodukebb wrote:not paying anymore money to a site who doesnt give a f*ck about it's employees or customers
f*ck you twill too
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users