Moderator: Community Team
Timminz wrote:I voted for "no. It's called Classic for a reason", but if it were to be revamped, I would not complain. Unless there became 2 'looks' of the same freaking map. That's just stupid, IMO. There is absolutely no need to have 2 versions of the exact same map (game-play-wise).
jonesthecurl wrote:Timminz wrote:I voted for "no. It's called Classic for a reason", but if it were to be revamped, I would not complain. Unless there became 2 'looks' of the same freaking map. That's just stupid, IMO. There is absolutely no need to have 2 versions of the exact same map (game-play-wise).
Haven't voted, don't have a strong enough opinion to do so.
BUt I can't see the point of two concurretn maps of the same game. it's uh, the same game.
happy2seeyou wrote:I don't like all the revamps. I wish they would just stick to making new maps instead of messing with the older ones.
owenshooter wrote:happy2seeyou wrote:I don't like all the revamps. I wish they would just stick to making new maps instead of messing with the older ones.
agree, to a degree... stopped playing Montreal after the revamp... can't stand how it looks now... however, this brazil update is great... the old map i rarely played, because i couldn't stand to look at it.. ha... anyway, as long as the community is brought along through the process, and there is an open debate BEFORE an update begins, i'm down with it... for the most part tho, make new maps!!!-0
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
qeee1 wrote:It's not stubborn to not want a revamp, I just like it the way it is.
Blitzaholic wrote:classic is fine the way it is
however, for some reason i do like rjbeals option 1 on the new re-vamp of the brazil map
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
qeee1 wrote:... Two maps is undesirable from a user interface perspective.
jiminski wrote:qeee1 wrote:... Two maps is undesirable from a user interface perspective.
why is that queee?
Kaplowitz wrote:jiminski wrote:qeee1 wrote:... Two maps is undesirable from a user interface perspective.
why is that queee?
Cant it be a setting in Control panel? It could switch to the old xml and everything!
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
qeee1 wrote:Fair enough if lack's willing to put in the coding, then we'll just have to argue about which should be the default one.
Plus once the coding is in place why not have multiple skins for every map?
Zemljanin wrote:About Classic, I didn't vote. Problem is complex. I'd accept new version instead of old one - if it would be "really same, but undoubtedly better"... There are artists able to make it, but I'm not sure that CC has such artists.
If, however, revamp would be MUCH better, but pretty different - I'd accept it, but only with condition that old one also stayed.
I don't know whether you understand me, but I'm not that important...
happy2seeyou wrote:Dangit Jimi stop changing the title.I logged on and couldn't figure out when I had already written in a thread about sex selling something lol.
But nice idea on the title lol, I bet a lot more people are coming in here now.
jiminski wrote:This option, for me, would be perfect!
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users