Iliad wrote:and I hope the mods follow it up and listen to the advice.
Just don't get to carried away

Moderator: Community Team
Iliad wrote:and I hope the mods follow it up and listen to the advice.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
amazzony wrote:I haven't read through this thread because I could care less so if it has been mentioned already then sorry for the post. Just wanted to say that if you want people to read them then the guidelines thread should be somewhere where it can be found easily and noticed right away, not in the middle of announcements.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:amazzony wrote:I haven't read through this thread because I could care less so if it has been mentioned already then sorry for the post. Just wanted to say that if you want people to read them then the guidelines thread should be somewhere where it can be found easily and noticed right away, not in the middle of announcements.
On the main forum board there is a clear link to them at the top and you can also find smaller links at the top of each individual forum when you enter them. DO you feel like there needs to be more? If so do you have any suggestions?
amazzony wrote:gimil wrote:amazzony wrote:I haven't read through this thread because I could care less so if it has been mentioned already then sorry for the post. Just wanted to say that if you want people to read them then the guidelines thread should be somewhere where it can be found easily and noticed right away, not in the middle of announcements.
On the main forum board there is a clear link to them at the top and you can also find smaller links at the top of each individual forum when you enter them. DO you feel like there needs to be more? If so do you have any suggestions?
Right, knew I have seen them somewhere, guess I'm just so used to them being there that ignored them today. But where you can see them in each individual forum, I just don't know. Aah, after looking closer I saw them but I think they are too well camouflaged in there because I can see right away the colorful moderators and after a closer look I notice the guidelines. Plus I think that they are not that useful in there because for example when I go to tournaments then I click on Create/Join or Ongoing right away and don't click first on Tournaments and then pick which sub forum I like.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Don't ever post personal information of other users. Anywhere. Ever. Even if they already posted it somewhere else. This includes posting personal information about a CC user on another site, you will be held accountable here.
God wrote:Bigotry takes into account historic events, emotional baggage and generally accepted associations with a term, phrase or intent - posting "White Power" in a thread has a history and is bigamous
Iliad wrote:Optimus Prime wrote:*sigh....*
Who had the brilliant idea to post this for "community feedback" before making it official? That decision has now left this entire revamp of the community guidelines in a position where it will now take until the end of next summer before anything is finalized.
I like you Night Strike, and I always will, but this was a mistake. The guidelines certainly need to be beefed up and clarified, but you just made it a whole hell of a lot harder.
Yeah Damn Night Strike, for actually asking of the opinion of the community you're supposed to be running. Optimus this was a good move, and I hope the mods follow it up and listen to the advice.
Optimus Prime wrote:Posting a painting from the 13th century with exposed nipples to claim that we're evil dictators when we ask you to remove it is also just being annoying, and you're probably just being a troll at that point.
Optimus Prime wrote:Iliad wrote:Optimus Prime wrote:*sigh....*
Who had the brilliant idea to post this for "community feedback" before making
it official? That decision has now left this entire revamp of the
community guidelines in a position where it will now take until the end
of next summer before anything is finalized.
I like you Night Strike, and I always will, but this was a mistake. The guidelines
certainly need to be beefed up and clarified, but you just made it a
whole hell of a lot harder.
Yeah Damn Night Strike, for actually asking of the opinion of the community you're supposed to be running. Optimus this was a good move, and I hope the mods follow it up
and listen to the advice.
Yeah, Iliad, it was a great move,
up until all of you start pissing and moaning about the fact that none
of your suggestions were ever heeded. It's a lovely double-edged sword,
isn't it?
heavycola wrote:Optimus Prime wrote:Posting a painting from the 13th century with exposed nipples to claim that we're evil dictators when we ask you to remove it is also just being annoying, and you're probably just being a troll at that point.
Seriously people, all you do with these attempts to make your rules watertight and to prevent posters taking the piss is make them more determined to f*ck with you. "...nipples and areola..." whose idea was that?? i mean it's ridiculous AND hilarious all at once.Optimus Prime wrote:Iliad wrote:Optimus Prime wrote:*sigh....*
Who had the brilliant idea to post this for "community feedback" before making
it official? That decision has now left this entire revamp of the
community guidelines in a position where it will now take until the end
of next summer before anything is finalized.
I like you Night Strike, and I always will, but this was a mistake. The guidelines
certainly need to be beefed up and clarified, but you just made it a
whole hell of a lot harder.
Yeah Damn Night Strike, for actually asking of the opinion of the community you're supposed to be running. Optimus this was a good move, and I hope the mods follow it up
and listen to the advice.
Yeah, Iliad, it was a great move,
up until all of you start pissing and moaning about the fact that none
of your suggestions were ever heeded. It's a lovely double-edged sword,
isn't it?
"all of you"...? Ah i see, it's a god complex. That explains it. 'Big fish in small pond' won't do it - try 'runty tadpoles in small puddle'
jayde wrote:The "we are right no matter what don't question us" is a bit over the top don't you think? I've seen it in several places, most notable in the chat section - "Moderator directions and/or decisions made are to be followed without question." In my limited time here, I've seen several times where chat mods were wrong or had their own agenda or acted like asses baiting, flaming, or spamming. If you have to repeatedly keep puffing out your chest to tell people that you're in charge, then it's painfully obvious that you're not. Respect can't be demanded, even by a set of guidelines.
jbrettlip wrote:Not arguing FOR porn in any way shape or form. I am pointing out that your guidelines are not well written on that subject, and that if no nipples are allowed, any shirtless male athlete shoudl not be allowed either. Bruce Lee, Mike Tyson, every UFC guy......etc
Make it a no nudity policy. And actually enforce it.
Believe it or not, mods don't read EVERY thread in the forums, so not everything gets noticed.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
nagerous wrote:Are you sure discussion via PM is "ALWAYS" preferred?
Last I heard, the mods were getting pretty irate, about people continuingly arguing their case via PM, and dismissed it as "PM spam".
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
nagerous wrote:Are you sure discussion via PM is "ALWAYS" preferred?
Last I heard, the mods were getting pretty irate, about people continuingly arguing their case via PM, and dismissed it as "PM spam".
nagerous wrote:Are you sure discussion via PM is "ALWAYS" preferred?
Last I heard, the mods were getting pretty irate, about people continuingly arguing their case via PM, and dismissed it as "PM spam".
InsomniaRed wrote:nagerous wrote:Are you sure discussion via PM is "ALWAYS" preferred?
Last I heard, the mods were getting pretty irate, about people continuingly arguing their case via PM, and dismissed it as "PM spam".
Well I know both jayde and NS are talking about Live Chat right now, and I'd much rather gets PMs(on Live Chat, but if someone wants to Forum PM me, I wouldn't mind either) to discuss issues one on one with the person rather than have them throw things out in Live Chat. Mostly people do it to provoke others to argue and fight or to have them also attack the mod/mods there at the time. So rather than being a public disturbance, yes PMs are preferred. I don't see how asking people to go to a PM to maturely discuss a problem as a huge request, but for some reason it rarely happens.
Optimus Prime wrote:Iliad wrote:Optimus Prime wrote:*sigh....*
Who had the brilliant idea to post this for "community feedback" before making it official? That decision has now left this entire revamp of the community guidelines in a position where it will now take until the end of next summer before anything is finalized.
I like you Night Strike, and I always will, but this was a mistake. The guidelines certainly need to be beefed up and clarified, but you just made it a whole hell of a lot harder.
Yeah Damn Night Strike, for actually asking of the opinion of the community you're supposed to be running. Optimus this was a good move, and I hope the mods follow it up and listen to the advice.
Yeah, Iliad, it was a great move, up until all of you start pissing and moaning about the fact that none of your suggestions were ever heeded. It's a lovely double-edged sword, isn't it?
Iliad wrote:Actually I was suggesting that if you do ask us for our opinions, you do listen to them. So drop that tone, though doesn't really matter because you're not going to be listening to us, the community anyway. But at least you guys are perfect, you will never make mistakes or go on power trips and we all respect and like you.
Oh wait.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users