Moderator: Community Team
ParadiceCity9 wrote:I dno bout the win percentages...those are quite hard to gain for the people with a few thousand games![]()
(It takes me about 100 games won with no losses to raise my percentage)
Blitzaholic wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:I dno bout the win percentages...those are quite hard to gain for the people with a few thousand games![]()
(It takes me about 100 games won with no losses to raise my percentage)
get winning then, and most would get a bronze or silver, then work your way up, the point is to give more options out there that many have to strive for
ParadiceCity9 wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:I dno bout the win percentages...those are quite hard to gain for the people with a few thousand games![]()
(It takes me about 100 games won with no losses to raise my percentage)
get winning then, and most would get a bronze or silver, then work your way up, the point is to give more options out there that many have to strive for
How bout we wait until we have a 1st 5 to the standard 27, then we change the medals?
Blitzaholic wrote:lolpc9
also
joined date
jan-june 2006 diamond
july-dec 2006 platinum
jan-june 2007 gold
july-dec 2007 silver
anytime in 2008-bronze
Blitzaholic wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:I dno bout the win percentages...those are quite hard to gain for the people with a few thousand games![]()
(It takes me about 100 games won with no losses to raise my percentage)
get winning then, and most would get a bronze or silver, then work your way up, the point is to give more options out there that many have to strive for
ParadiceCity9 wrote:Well what about the people who predominantly play standard games? Like 5-8 man ones at least.
And for the record, my percentage is raising because of 1v1 games, contrary to owen's statement.
Owenshooter wrote: i know more than a few people i play with regularly that have seen their 50-60% win percentage drop to the 30% range due to 1v1 and speed games.
owenshooter wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:I dno bout the win percentages...those are quite hard to gain for the people with a few thousand games![]()
(It takes me about 100 games won with no losses to raise my percentage)
get winning then, and most would get a bronze or silver, then work your way up, the point is to give more options out there that many have to strive for
no, no, no, no... paradice only wants new medals he already qualifies for or can obtain easily. heaven forbid a medal that he would have to work for. i for one love the idea, blitz. i am proud of my win percentage, and am always trying to get it higher by learning as much about the game/maps as i can. i know more than a few people i play with regularly that have seen their 50-60% win percentage drop to the 30% range due to 1v1 and speed games. medals are meant for achievements, and a high win percentage is an achievement. i for one am never going to gain a speed or 1v1 medal, but i don't think they are bad medals, just because they would be hard for me to obtain. people need to take the blinders off, and view the entire topic. the medals shouldn't be just about "you", but about the community. nice suggestion blitz!!-0
ParadiceCity9 wrote:What about a medal for BEING rated the most?
ParadiceCity9 wrote:owenshooter wrote: i know more than a few people i play with regularly that have seen their 50-60% win percentage drop to the 30% range due to 1v1 and speed games.
That's what I was talking about. And I score 99th percentile in both math and writing on PSAT's and 86th percentile for reading. Don't tell me to be worried, I'm fine. In fact, I'm well.
owenshooter wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:owenshooter wrote: i know more than a few people i play with regularly that have seen their 50-60% win percentage drop to the 30% range due to 1v1 and speed games.
That's what I was talking about. And I score 99th percentile in both math and writing on PSAT's and 86th percentile for reading. Don't tell me to be worried, I'm fine. In fact, I'm well.
again, what part of that mentions you? i don't play regularly with you! you aren't one of my partners! so, how is this about you? work on your reading comprehension skills before you try to start up with me again. and blitz, keep coming with the ideas, a few of them are sure fire winners.-0
ParadiceCity9 wrote:But you were implying that that happens to most people, since we were discussing the win percentage medal.
Robinette wrote:this guy says you can never have too many medals:
mightyredarmy wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:I posted this in suggestion, but guess could go here too on asking cc community what they think
adding platinum and diamond status
currently bronze is 20 wins, silver 100, gold 400
my suggestion would be this:
bronze 20
silver 100
gold 300
platinum 500
diamond 1000
sound good?
PLUS
whichever player currently has the highest score in each medal category gets to hold a special hero medal, which works in the same way as the conqueror rank at the top of the scoreboard.
Could obviously be jointly held (in the case of all maps completed)
Lhuth wrote:Haven't read the entire thread so this may or may not have come up already, but the only other medal idea i can think of is a total games completed medal - maybe 100,500,1000 or soemthing like that?
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users