ParadiceCity9 wrote:Allow me to explain, for the too-big-of-a-number-th time, what I've been trying to say, but obviously have been misunderstood.
First, you say this:
ParadiceCity9 wrote:I think it's dumb that people put other people on their foe list because they're on someone else's foe list.
You follow that with this:
ParadiceCity9 wrote:I put someone on foe after they put me on foe, but not because I was on the list, but because of the action of them putting me on.
They mean the same thing.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:They put me on because I "suicided" on my target in a doodle assassin, but it wasn't even a suicide, I had another territ and that was my only chance of winning. I wasn't even eliminated. I find that a stupid reason for foeing someone, so I foed them. That's not so hard to understand, is it?
So, essentially, you did put them on your Foe List because they put you on their Foe List
ParadiceCity9 wrote:I have also stated twice I think in this thread, that I learned that it's a matter of opinion, what qualifies someone for the foe list. I said this, but it was never taken into account by all of you, and the thread continued. I essentially submitted, but all of you kept the thread going, not me. Don't tell me to submit. I already did.
To be fair, you contradicted yourself this entire thread. You never really submitted, as submitting would probably have included you stop posting. If you really wanted to submit, you would have given up trying to explain yourself.