Assuming you mean randomized at the start of the match, sure, why would it matter? Randomizing after every round, on the other hand, would just be silly.
Jota wrote:Assuming you mean randomized at the start of the match, sure, why would it matter? Randomizing after every round, on the other hand, would just be silly.
Why would it be silly? It would bring different type of game
Yeah, one of the reasons I play sequential is that there is too much random chance in freestyle. So by throwing this into sequential it would screw it up too much.
If it's random then a player could go twice in a row
The art of concentrating strength at one point, forcing a breakthrough, rolling up and securing the flanks on either side, and then penetrating like lightning deep into his rear, before the enemy has time to react.
- Field Marshall Erwin Rommel
for this question is how many people only play sequential if they are in the first or second spot. I see several of the top 10 players starting sequential games all the time and wonder if they would still play if they were player number 6?
That was my original question, not random after the first round, just the starting order. Kind of like rolling the dice to see who goes first.
I have started a sequential game and gone last. Sequential is the fairest option especially if you work nights. It sucks to take your turn before heading out to work only to come home to a map that resembles nothing like you left it (cause most players have gone twice).
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.