Page 1 of 2

Conquer Club IS NOT RISK!!!

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:42 pm
by Coleman
Priority: 2,077,381

A few foundry posts made me think this was necessary, as new people throw around the word risk a lot to describe things. It's too bad the banner contest is over. :lol:

Image

EDIT: This was a suggestion for changing the top of the site. I do not appreciate being moved to General without any explanation.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:06 pm
by TheKidsTrumpet
Haha huzzah Coleman. Aye I agree with you. People need to learn to differentiate between the two. The argument and bickering in the foundry over new maps/ideas/innovations has gotten stale.

They are not the same.

Btdub nice banner.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:46 pm
by Spockers
only if you disregard the fact that it is.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:32 pm
by graeme89
Why is it different?

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:36 pm
by Bavarian Raven
a rose by any other name is still a rose...

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:59 pm
by nagerous
CC is risk though :lol:

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:11 pm
by soundout9
nagerous wrote:CC is risk though :lol:

It's just not affiliated with it :wink:

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:57 pm
by freezie
It's not risk in the fact risk can't be played with Fog of war.

Other things too, of course. But FOG is the best exemple.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:02 pm
by graeme89
[quote="freezie"]It's not risk in the fact risk can't be played with Fog of war.

Other things too, of course. But FOG is the best exemple.[/quote

From Colemans post I thought there was a fundamental difference, so its just down to marketing?

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:05 pm
by Twill
Sorry for the move Coleman, it looks more like a GD thing than a suggestion thing - or at least it will get more eyes in here than in suggestions and I think it deserves them :)

Oh, and as a banner for the top of the site (which you should have stated if it was a suggestion) Rejected :)
Great idea, sadly no can do :-p

Have a good one
Twill

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:06 pm
by freezie
graeme89 wrote:
freezie wrote:It's not risk in the fact risk can't be played with Fog of war.

Other things too, of course. But FOG is the best exemple.


From Colemans post I thought there was a fundamental difference, so its just down to marketing?



In all seriousness, it's from the 2 sides.

Lack couldn't have made this RISK and call it that way, due to copyrights from Habsro. It is not risk in any ways, otherwise this site would not be alive still as we speak.

It's also not risk in the fact that many options here couldn't, never been and will never be played on the Risk board.

Freestyle, Fog Of War, speed games, random card colors.

Those things will never appear in Risk, and it's what makes this site Unique. And it's better this way.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:15 pm
by Mr_Adams
Bavarian Raven wrote:a rose by any other name is still a rose...


I believe the saying goes
"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet", William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:18 pm
by Coleman
The rules are different than risk. And people shouldn't pop into anywhere and say, "well risk is like this..." because this is not risk, and we don't care what risk is like.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:22 pm
by Mr_Adams
Mr_Adams wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:a rose by any other name is still a rose...


I believe the saying goes
"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet", William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet


Yes I'm sure of it now Act 2 scene 2
JULIET

'Tis but thy name that is my enemy;
Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.
What's Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot,
Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
What's in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name,
And for that name which is no part of thee
Take all myself.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:33 pm
by graeme89
Coleman wrote:The rules are different than risk. And people shouldn't pop into anywhere and say, "well risk is like this..." because this is not risk, and we don't care what risk is like.


I personally have never equated CC with Risk as I played it before, but surely ( and dont call me Shirley ) the rules are the same. I love CC , best website ever, great fun.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:38 pm
by graeme89
Mr_Adams wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:a rose by any other name is still a rose...


I believe the saying goes
"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet", William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet


Yes I'm sure of it now Act 2 scene 2
JULIET

'Tis but thy name that is my enemy;
Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.
What's Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot,
Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
What's in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name,
And for that name which is no part of thee
Take all myself.


Cry havoc and loose the dogs of war

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:07 pm
by john1099
Mr_Adams wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:a rose by any other name is still a rose...


I believe the saying goes
"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet", William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet


Yes I'm sure of it now Act 2 scene 2
JULIET

'Tis but thy name that is my enemy;
Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.
What's Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot,
Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
What's in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name,
And for that name which is no part of thee
Take all myself.


Whats funny is I'm doing a paper on Romeo and Juliet as we speak.

However, when quoting, you should use proper techniques.
"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet" (William Shakespeare Act II scene ii).

;)

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:22 pm
by The Factory
To me CC always seemed like Risk but redesigned for online play with modifications to accommodate more variations of play, not to mention differences in player time zone/schedules.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:38 pm
by Genghis Khan CA
Mr_Adams wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:a rose by any other name is still a rose...


I believe the saying goes
"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet", William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet


Not if you called them stenchblossoms.
Or crap-weeds.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:40 pm
by The Weird One
:lol:

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:18 am
by Visaoni
Genghis Khan CA wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:a rose by any other name is still a rose...


I believe the saying goes
"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet", William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet


Not if you called them stenchblossoms.
Or crap-weeds.


Eh, they'd smell the same. It would just apparently be a parallel universe where human sense of smell was altered.

Edit: Well, I just realized... if I'm bringing parallel universes into this... the rose could just smell different. But then I suppose it wouldn't really be a rose... Perhaps I was better off not mentioning a parallel universe.

Re: Conquer Club IS NOT RISK!!!

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:38 am
by wicked
Coleman wrote:EDIT: This was a suggestion for changing the top of the site. I do not appreciate being moved to General without any explanation.


Ask and ye shall receive. It wasn't obvious it was a suggestion since the form wasn't used. In fact, it came across as a joke so was treated as one. We have enough suggestions to wade through w/o having to muddle through jokes and such. Thanks for understanding.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:49 am
by khellendros
actually, calling a rose by a different name would make it smell differently... there is a lot of money put into psychological research in product marketing, and one of the things they have discovered is changing the name or the colour of the package of the food product will result in differing experiences of taste. For example when they used more yellow in the colouring of a can of sprite, the majority of the testers said that it tasted more like lemons than normal sprite despite the fact that it was the same product...man that was a wordy lecture...

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:18 pm
by Rocketry
...but they are somewhat similair, dont you think?

Rocketry

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:54 pm
by DaGip
graeme89 wrote:
Coleman wrote:The rules are different than risk. And people shouldn't pop into anywhere and say, "well risk is like this..." because this is not risk, and we don't care what risk is like.


I personally have never equated CC with Risk as I played it before, but surely ( and dont call me Shirley ) the rules are the same. I love CC , best website ever, great fun.


And certainly I have never equated CC or Risk with Shakespeare... :roll: