Conquer Club

I cannot for the life of me understand why mentioning someone winning the game in your negative feedback for them counts as retaliatory. For example if I were to say "this player used a secret alliance to win the game" or "this player kept on building his armies when he had the game easily won and made me deadbeat to get the game over with", those would be considered retaliatory. This is just a thought, but I don't see why mentioning the person winning counts are retaliatory.

Both of those examples could be justified as reasons for leaving negative feedback
and mentioning "the person winning" doesn't make either one retaliatory.

wrestler1ump wrote:I cannot for the life of me understand why mentioning someone winning the game in your negative feedback for them counts as retaliatory. For example if I were to say "this player used a secret alliance to win the game" or "this player kept on building his armies when he had the game easily won and made me deadbeat to get the game over with", those would be considered retaliatory. This is just a thought, but I don't see why mentioning the person winning counts are retaliatory.

Hey, I remember you.

You are a huge dick. hahaha!

I like that Clockwork guy's style...

ClockworK wrote:

wrestler1ump wrote:I cannot for the life of me understand why mentioning someone winning the game in your negative feedback for them counts as retaliatory. For example if I were to say "this player used a secret alliance to win the game" or "this player kept on building his armies when he had the game easily won and made me deadbeat to get the game over with", those would be considered retaliatory. This is just a thought, but I don't see why mentioning the person winning counts are retaliatory.

Hey, I remember you.

You are a huge dick. hahaha!

I remember you. I think you are the one to whom I gave my worst wishes in your personal life.

What was the exact thing you wrote down that was classified as retailitory. You could very easily have been leaving faulty feedback, but then making it seem like you aren't while posting here...

wrestler1ump wrote:

ClockworK wrote:

wrestler1ump wrote:I cannot for the life of me understand why mentioning someone winning the game in your negative feedback for them counts as retaliatory. For example if I were to say "this player used a secret alliance to win the game" or "this player kept on building his armies when he had the game easily won and made me deadbeat to get the game over with", those would be considered retaliatory. This is just a thought, but I don't see why mentioning the person winning counts are retaliatory.

Hey, I remember you.

You are a huge dick. hahaha!

I remember you. I think you are the one to whom I gave my worst wishes in your personal life.

Haha, that was pathetic

Clockwork, don't flame outside of flame wars.

ump, don't bait people. You know how the FB system works.

I don't know how many feedback's I've had to remove :/ It sucks

Are you implying that ClockworK wasn't complimenting his 1ump ?

hey its all in good fun. 1ump made some hurtful comments. Too bad I am invincible!

I then shot him with my ignore gun.

feedback system blows.... they are now allowing you to leave a neg if you put someone on ignore. for all you guys that play like a complete moron-- continue to do so and when the game's over and you're on someone's ignore list.... leave the player where you completely wrecked a neg. go figure