Page 1 of 1

??

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:16 pm
by shortstop
Hello shortstop,

Feedback, if used properly, can be an excellent resource to gauge reputation. If abused, it quickly becomes useless. The feedback quoted below is inappropriate and has been deleted.

feedback you left for Kegler wrote:
Extremely greedy maneuvers, which forced me to sacrifice many units to take away the third player's bonus; later on, when I had no units to take the bonus with, he didn't even both, even though he could have easily. Also called me a "douchebag" in chat. Never playing with him again, and I am also expecting retaliatory.

Reason for deletion: Not factual


Regards,
The Conquer Club



Um, what? This was 100% factual. Check game chat, he called me a "douchebag".

And if you're saying that he didn't make those moves, it IS my opinion isn't it? All he had to do was attack an army of 4 to take a bonus of 5 but instead left me to attack an army of 7.

In search of an explanation as to how this is "not factual".

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:29 pm
by oggiss
I guess it's automatic or they check it and don't give a crap what's in the feedback.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:39 pm
by shortstop
oggiss wrote:I guess it's automatic or they check it and don't give a crap what's in the feedback.


It didn't even say inappropriate language, it said not factual...

Anyway, is this the right place to appeal this removal?

Re: ??

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:40 pm
by insomniacdude
shortstop wrote:
Hello shortstop,

Feedback, if used properly, can be an excellent resource to gauge reputation. If abused, it quickly becomes useless. The feedback quoted below is inappropriate and has been deleted.

feedback you left for Kegler wrote:
Extremely greedy maneuvers, which forced me to sacrifice many units to take away the third player's bonus; later on, when I had no units to take the bonus with, he didn't even both, even though he could have easily. Also called me a "douchebag" in chat. Never playing with him again, and I am also expecting retaliatory.

Reason for deletion: Not factual


Regards,
The Conquer Club



Um, what? This was 100% factual. Check game chat, he called me a "douchebag".

And if you're saying that he didn't make those moves, it IS my opinion isn't it? All he had to do was attack an army of 4 to take a bonus of 5 but instead left me to attack an army of 7.

In search of an explanation as to how this is "not factual".


Game number would help.

Sometimes the best thing to do in a game is ensure you are not the one doing the fighting that you want done. Manipulating the actions of other players is a HUGE part of the game.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:43 pm
by wicked
since when is feedback the place to tell other people how to play? everyone here has different playing styles, so if he didn't do what you wanted, so what? he plays his game and you play yours. him not succumbing to your wishes of how YOU wanted the game played isn't grounds for feedback.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:21 pm
by shortstop
Fuckin..

Forget it. Apparantly these things never took place.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:17 pm
by wrestler1ump
Seems like a factual feedback to me. I know I've been given the most absurd of feedbacks, where people say that I'm a bad player, yet those are always accepted by the moderating department. The feedback system is there for laughs and nothing more, so I wouldn't recommend taking it too seriously.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:19 pm
by wrestler1ump
wicked wrote:since when is feedback the place to tell other people how to play? everyone here has different playing styles, so if he didn't do what you wanted, so what? he plays his game and you play yours. him not succumbing to your wishes of how YOU wanted the game played isn't grounds for feedback.


How ironic, considering you let these feedbacks left for me stand:

Really an awful player. Tried to make alliances with me, and then attacked when I refused. Made alliances with another player, then attacked him the very next turn. His strategy was neither consistent nor intelligent. He quickly secured the strongest position in the game and then made poor decision after poor decision to fritter away his advantage. In addition, he was verbally abusive in game chat, and generally unpleasant. Thanks for the 21 points loser.
From harijan

bad player, bad strategy, blaims other stuff for losing, easy points though
lord voldemort

He is a terrible, awful, disguistingly bad player, avoid.
Norse