Conquer Club

Just wonder why it is that 95% of the time you only get feedback when the person beats you. I'm kind of sick of the same feedback. oh good game would have won but didn't get the dice, or was ahead of the game most the time but made a mistake. basically it seems like the feed back is so the winner can let everyone who looks at your feed back see they beat you.

The other feed back I see that sucks is when you take someone out of a game trying to get cards or just get rid on them becasue they are constantly attacking you and then they leave you Negative feedback and complain about how your strategy sucking and you are an idiot because you took out there armies. That's the point, to take each other out and if I want to get rid of you take it like a man and move on. don't leave me negative feedback and complain about my strategy.(Given the exceptoin of escalating games where you can be an idiot player)

I just find it funny. I vow to only leave feedback to the people who beat me and are nice about it:)

good thread topic, would have gotten more responce but made a mistake. Would read again.

groth wrote:Just wonder why it is that 95% of the time you only get feedback when the person beats you. I'm kind of sick of the same feedback. oh good game would have won but didn't get the dice, or was ahead of the game most the time but made a mistake. basically it seems like the feed back is so the winner can let everyone who looks at your feed back see they beat you.

I think this is mostly because when you're eliminated, you're less likely to go and give feedback than when you win, and have that list presented to you as you finish your turn.

The other feed back I see that sucks is when you take someone out of a game trying to get cards or just get rid on them becasue they are constantly attacking you and then they leave you Negative feedback and complain about how your strategy sucking and you are an idiot because you took out there armies. That's the point, to take each other out and if I want to get rid of you take it like a man and move on. don't leave me negative feedback and complain about my strategy.(Given the exceptoin of escalating games where you can be an idiot player)

I think some people tend to look at the board, and come up with reasons why the people around them would be better off attacking eachother instead of you (hoping they see it this way as well). When they don't, it can seem like a mistake, to the people who just lost. Granted, people who think that way probably don't play CC very well, but I can't really judge them considering I suck.


But the main thing is, nobody cares about feedback anyway. I've only gotten 6 feedbacks, and they were all from when I was a new recruit, I think.

stop whining.

I know I've given feedback to the winner at least once.

groth wrote:Just wonder why it is that 95% of the time you only get feedback when the person beats you. I'm kind of sick of the same feedback. oh good game would have won but didn't get the dice, or was ahead of the game most the time but made a mistake. basically it seems like the feed back is so the winner can let everyone who looks at your feed back see they beat you.

That's funny and I have one positive feedback that irritates me in a similar way. It was a game where I just got crappy dice and couldn't get anything going. I mean anything. So, obviously this was not a game I went on to win and all of a sudden I notice I have a new positive feedback.

Something to the effect of, "Great player but just stood in the way between me and world domination". Some crap like that. For starters, GFY. Secondly, how the hell do you know if I'm a great player, the 4-5 turns I managed to take consisted of deploying and losing all my rolls. I mean, that doesn't make me a bad player, but it sure as hell doesn't tell you I'm great.

Please see this thread, and feel free to post your constructive comments.

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=46419\

Best,
LMR

groth wrote:Just wonder why it is that 95% of the time you only get feedback when the person beats you.

That's odd, most of my feedback that I write is for people who beat me to a bloody pulp, but did with with grace style and a superior strategy. That might be because I don't keep accurate notes during the game of who has been doing well. So the odds are you have done exceptionaly well and have won as a result or you lost because of other reasons at the last second and your greatness was burned into my mind. I write feedback for those people as well.

I'm not trying to whin about the feedback. Just find it funny sometimes. There was a lot of good points in the replys. thanks

Well written thread, wish you could've gotten better luck with it, will read your topics again