Page 1 of 1
mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 21, 2008 7:06 pm
by SlayerQC
Game 2488186All new users, joined the same day (may 21st), all unpaid members.
There was one slot left open when i saw the game.
Doesnt all this look suspicious?
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 21, 2008 7:07 pm
by SlayerQC
and they are all online as I speak.
Other games were played with almost all these players.
One guy has 2 games completed since joining today.
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 21, 2008 11:06 pm
by gloryordeath
send in a ticket if you think they are multis.
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 21, 2008 11:34 pm
by SlayerQC
you think they are?it crossed my mind of course.I wanted to know what people thought.
No one replied til now so I assume i was wrong and that no one cared.
Maybe I will, but not right now, bed time soon, by the time im back from work tomorrow, im sure this thread will be way down there again and ill forget about it.
Will try though.
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 21, 2008 11:42 pm
by Hrvat
LOL
A Noob convention...
Freemium all
All joined 21/5 (from Wed May 21, 2008 12:16 pm to Wed May 21, 2008 1:56 pm)
kylejack USA
cumsitter USA
sauzer USA
-----all 3 are playing in 2 games together, and two of them in another game
game no 2489218
game no 2488769
game no 2488186
and the there is ianthekorean, who has also played with these players.

(did not check others who are from different countries)
---------------------
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 21, 2008 11:50 pm
by SlayerQC
sure is a newb convention, i saw the game grow in no time while i was browsing, just thought it was weird.
I wanted to join but checked their accounts and realised they all joined at once so ive refrained from joining and posted here instead.
I never said they cheated but thought it was weird for sure.
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 21, 2008 11:51 pm
by SlayerQC
that gaem will turn into a circus soon, lol!
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Tue May 27, 2008 4:30 pm
by Sauzer
what up
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Tue May 27, 2008 4:32 pm
by Teger
kylejack sauzer and cumsitter are 3 staffers on the ron paul campaign who play this game for fun together... notice how their scores are all at the expense of each other
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Tue May 27, 2008 4:34 pm
by cumsitter
when i add armies to a couuntry all the other countries nearby get mad and impose sanctions. sometimes i think its not worth it to bring Christianity and Democracy to the heathens but then i realize it's God's will.
what's it like to analyze every game looking for cheaters because of your precious points rather than just sit back and play a board game? i imagine it's thrilling
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Tue May 27, 2008 10:35 pm
by Hrvat
cumsitter wrote:when i add armies to a couuntry all the other countries nearby get mad and impose sanctions. sometimes i think its not worth it to bring Christianity and Democracy to the heathens but then i realize it's God's will.
what's it like to analyze every game looking for cheaters because of your precious points rather than just sit back and play a board game? i imagine it's thrilling
Nah, it is not 'thrilling'.
However, I dislike joining games where "3 workmates" play together... Somehow, '3 workmates' tend to survive other players and they fight it out among themselves....
Did '3 workmates' announce in the game chat that they are "3 workmates"???
Answer: they did not announce in the game chat that they are "3 workmates". And what about "ianthekorean", he has also played with one or two of "3 workmates" on number of occasions.
3-4-5-6-player 1vs1 games are supposed to be 1vs1, not '3 workmates' vs 1, nor '3 workmates+1 vs 1"
And all alliances, relations, and "workmateships" should be announced in the game chat, or it is considered cheating (at least in my book)
"Christianity and Democracy" what has that got to do with a rise of price of rice in China???
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Tue May 27, 2008 10:41 pm
by Hrvat
cumsitter wrote:what's it like to analyze every game looking for cheaters because of your precious points rather than just sit back and play a board game? i imagine it's thrilling
What points?
I am Private.

And I was about to join that game... Now, that was a close call...

Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 28, 2008 12:35 am
by MrMoody
cumsitter wrote:what's it like to analyze every game looking for cheaters because of your precious points rather than just sit back and play a board game? i imagine it's thrilling
anyone believe this would be said by a noob? not something i would expect a noob to say..
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 28, 2008 11:44 am
by Sauzer
Hahah what is this about secret alliances? I password protect my games you sillies.
Also lolin' at the paranoia.
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 28, 2008 7:43 pm
by Hrvat
Sauzer wrote:Hahah what is this about secret alliances? I password protect my games you sillies.
Also lolin' at the paranoia.
Game 2488186 was a Public game, no passwords...
You can play as many Private games as you like, with your friends, however NOT public games.
I almost joined game 2488186... and there was NO password.
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 28, 2008 8:06 pm
by DaGip
Ron Paul Rules!
These guys are not multis, but a secret alliance is suspicious...word!
Vote Ron Paul!
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Wed May 28, 2008 8:12 pm
by Sauzer
Hrvat wrote:Game 2488186 was a Public game, no passwords...
You can play as many Private games as you like, with your friends, however NOT public games.
I almost joined game 2488186... and there was NO password.
Yeah that was before anyone had premium but afaik that game is going by the book anyway?
still lollin'
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Thu May 29, 2008 12:00 pm
by frogger4
listen, if you think they are multis, then fill out the form and let the IP address tell all. If you are too lazy to do that, I can do that for you.
Perhaps it is just a "secret alliance", which by the rules is not allowed. If you were not in that game, then stop complaining. Leave that to whoever lost.
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Thu May 29, 2008 2:54 pm
by cumsitter
Hrvat wrote:cumsitter wrote:when i add armies to a couuntry all the other countries nearby get mad and impose sanctions. sometimes i think its not worth it to bring Christianity and Democracy to the heathens but then i realize it's God's will.
what's it like to analyze every game looking for cheaters because of your precious points rather than just sit back and play a board game? i imagine it's thrilling
Nah, it is not 'thrilling'.
However, I dislike joining games where "3 workmates" play together... Somehow, '3 workmates' tend to survive other players and they fight it out among themselves....
Did '3 workmates' announce in the game chat that they are "3 workmates"???
Answer: they did not announce in the game chat that they are "3 workmates". And what about "ianthekorean", he has also played with one or two of "3 workmates" on number of occasions.
3-4-5-6-player 1vs1 games are supposed to be 1vs1, not '3 workmates' vs 1, nor '3 workmates+1 vs 1"
And all alliances, relations, and "workmateships" should be announced in the game chat, or it is considered cheating (at least in my book)
"Christianity and Democracy" what has that got to do with a rise of price of rice in China???
i do not understand your post. basmati rice from india > *, however. also i love the finger wagging emote
he's like i dont think so baby

Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Thu May 29, 2008 2:57 pm
by Sauzer
N-n-
new people playing on my site? Mercy, I had better go make a thread about it.

Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Thu Jun 05, 2008 6:00 pm
by kylejack
Several of us know each other from another website, none of us are multis. I've always announced alliances at the beginning of the game. The rules do not indicate that relationships or workmateships need to be announced, and if that's a rule, it should be added to the rules. Obviously everyone should reveal alliances, but just because two people know each other doesn't mean they are allied.
And there are some whiny people here.
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Thu Jun 05, 2008 6:06 pm
by kylejack
Hrvat wrote:Sauzer wrote:Hahah what is this about secret alliances? I password protect my games you sillies.
Also lolin' at the paranoia.
Game 2488186 was a Public game, no passwords...
You can play as many Private games as you like, with your friends, however NOT public games.
I almost joined game 2488186... and there was NO password.
2488186 was a game all of players who know each other from elsewhere. There was no need to announce any relationships, because we all knew each other. Its highly unlikely that you almost joined 2488186 as you claimed because we all joined it within 5 seconds of creating it. If you had managed to join the game, any alliances would have been announced to you. As it turned out, there were no alliances in that game and it was pretty much a free-for-all.
Re: mmmm, game 2488186. weird.

Posted:
Thu Jun 05, 2008 6:18 pm
by DoctorEntropy
You don't the know battles I've seen, the dice I've rolled. Let me tell you, war is hell lads, war is hell.