Top Dog wrote:detlef wrote:Your example is exactly why I included my disclaimer. Well, in reality, you just described a 9 player terminator game because you would have gotten 6 guys points and lost one and he would have gotten one guys points and lost none. None the less...
oh... oops
still in a couple four player games it's happened to me... when I get a poor set up I often just am able to slide by and plan perfectly how to finish them of and usualy die in the end because of my setup. but still win more than the true "winner"
I hate to play reality police but actually, what you're saying is not true.
I just checked your games out. You have played a number of 3 and 4 player terminator games. Of course, in a 3 player game, assuming equal rank, the only player who comes out ahead is the last man standing because anyone who eliminates the 1st player and then gets eliminated himself has a net zero deal.
So, I didn't bother looking into those games at all. As for 4+ player games, the only games where you ended up winning more points than you lost were ones that you won outright. In every game that you did not win, you eliminated either 1 or zero players meaning that you either lost points or gained essentially none.
This illustrates my point exactly. We might be intoxicated by the notion of getting the last laugh in a terminator game because we ended up with more points than the "winner". So much so, perhaps, that, like in your case, we convince ourselves it happens relatively often (or even at all). The reality of the matter, however, is that I'm rather certain that if anyone bothered to look into it, you'd find that was simply not the case. After all, the last man standing has a head start of 2 players worth of points over the 2nd to last player. The points he won by taking that player out and the points he didn't lose by being taken out. This very much stacks the deck against anyone's chances of not being last man standing but winning more points.