Conquer Club

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... =Astroheat

The game astro rated me on I played every turn he just got mad at me for yelling at him so how do I get a 1 star in attendence??!?!!?!? just for him not liking me thats pretty stupid he has given all 1 stars besides 1 person he gave a 5 star to in teammate.

and the complaining begins...

try PMing him about it. That might help.

wcaclimbing wrote:and the complaining begins...

try PMing him about it. That might help.

Not complaining. Honestly if you have ever played a game with me you will know I could give a shit about rating negs and everything i'm just saying.

Edit: Also I highly doubt all those people he played with deadbeated as he showed by ratings.

*manimal wrote:if you have ever played a game with me you will know I could give a shit about rating negs

Didn't you say you were starting new accounts to "start fresh"? I assumed that meant, you wanted to turn over a new leaf, and stop being such an ass in games. Apparently, it just meant, you were sick of being on so many ignore lists, and wanted to start that fresh.

Timminz wrote:

*manimal wrote:if you have ever played a game with me you will know I could give a shit about rating negs

Didn't you say you were starting new accounts to "start fresh"? I assumed that meant, you wanted to turn over a new leaf, and stop being such an ass in games. Apparently, it just meant, you were sick of being on so many ignore lists, and wanted to start that fresh.

2nd one.
I am who I am.

It's amazing! I never thought it would be possible for someone to abuse the multi rules. I don't mean using multis, I mean using a loophole to get off everyone's foe list. There's a reason so many people didn't want to play against you. Many reasons, in fact. For you to use a multi to circumnavigate the foe list is just amazing! Kudos to you for taking the worst thing someone can do here, and make it worse.

Timminz wrote:It's amazing! I never thought it would be possible for someone to abuse the multi rules. I don't mean using multis, I mean using a loophole to get off everyone's foe list. There's a reason so many people didn't want to play against you. Many reasons, in fact. For you to use a multi to circumnavigate the foe list is just amazing! Kudos to you for taking the worst thing someone can do here, and make it worse.

Thank you!

Well said, Tim. My guess is that westside is only allowed to stick around 'cause he's wiring so much money to lack. Call it passive bribery. Or on another note, let's just call it moronic. I can't believe CC let's cheaters get away with a point reset and loss of premium... oh well.

Nonetheless, you guys are bringing this offtopic. His point IS legitimate. This system will be abused if players leave feedback as such. This is just as legitimate to have feedback removed as it was to get negs removed in the previous system.

Haha, no it isn't, *manimal deserves 1 for attendance for all the games he's deadbeated from, in all of his forms. Other people need to know that he could be busted again at anytime and will then abandon his games and start all over.

BaldAdonis wrote:Haha, no it isn't, *manimal deserves 1 for attendance for all the games he's deadbeated from, in all of his forms. Other people need to know that he could be busted again at anytime and will then abandon his games and start all over.

1. Rating should be pertinent to his account. If he wants to screw it over - fine. westside was on my foe list. I left him a negative accordingly. I did not leave him a negative on other accounts if he did not do anything unsportsmanlike on them.

2. Ratings should only be pertinent to the games played, or that's at least how I feel about the situation, although I realize it's not specified anywhere. Next thing you know people will leave an attitude rating based on what they've seen in the forums.

FabledIntegral wrote:

BaldAdonis wrote:Haha, no it isn't, *manimal deserves 1 for attendance for all the games he's deadbeated from, in all of his forms. Other people need to know that he could be busted again at anytime and will then abandon his games and start all over.

1. Rating should be pertinent to his account. If he wants to screw it over - fine. westside was on my foe list. I left him a negative accordingly. I did not leave him a negative on other accounts if he did not do anything unsportsmanlike on them.

2. Ratings should only be pertinent to the games played, or that's at least how I feel about the situation, although I realize it's not specified anywhere. Next thing you know people will leave an attitude rating based on what they've seen in the forums.

Agreed. And I have only left manimal feedback based on games I've played with that particular account. The problem is that this kid keeps making new accounts, because he's sick of all the bad feedback he's received, and foe lists he's ended up on.

Actually if you think about it, he should probably be somewhere between an 8 and a 10 on attendance, since he is there twice a round, sometimes more.