Conquer Club

post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat

i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.

zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat

Whine much?

zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat

Bother...

jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.

it is

why am i not surprised johnny is listed?

DiM wrote:why am i not surprised johnny is listed?

...

zimmah wrote:

jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.

it is

What are you, the ratings police?


-tig

xxtig12683xx wrote:

zimmah wrote:

jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.

it is

What are you, the ratings police?


-tig

As has been said many times all memebers are free to investigate to there hearts content other memebers regardless of level of involvement with said memebers although this is probaly better suited for cheating and abuse since it is about abusing the new system...

Soloman wrote:

xxtig12683xx wrote:

zimmah wrote:

jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.

it is

What are you, the ratings police?


-tig

As has been said many times all memebers are free to investigate to there hearts content other memebers regardless of level of involvement with said memebers although this is probaly better suited for cheating and abuse since it is about abusing the new system...

And giving 5's is abuse how? Thats the only thing i want left for me, and thats all ive left for people...gosh dang'it i must be abusing the system.


-tig

zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat

I wouldn't call that abusing, everyone has diffrent opinions on how their opponents plays. Perhaps those 2 just feels that if they just play a clean and good game that they deserve a 5've.

zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat

This enforcer crap is a joke. Anyone who plays at 100% and make an enjoyable game, you can expect a 5 from me, and I'd expect a 5 back if I play at 100% and its also a good game for you. Leave me a 3 without cause, expect a 1 on the grounds of being a tool.

Ahha, so you think... I'll just wait... until the feedback opportunity is about to roll off... and then... haha... when you can't reciprocate... haha... I'll leave you an "average" rating. If that's you, then you're officially a tool.

show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0

owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0

I must have read that post wrong... Owen, did you just agree with me!!!!

zimmah, let's let people get used to the system first, and realize all 5's aren't really the way to go. I wouldn't classify it as abuse yet, as people are still getting used to how to rate.

owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0

I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.

Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.

i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0

owenshooter wrote:

Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.

i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0

Him not her


-tig

why do we have ratings now anyway? is it cuz alot of people would leave bad feedback with mean words? in my opinion if someone leaves alot of 5stars it does not mean they are "abusing" anything because they probably had no problems with the player and liked how the game went. if they want to give out lots of stars sooo be it.

alyzMAMA wrote:why do we have ratings now anyway? is it cuz alot of people would leave bad feedback with mean words? in my opinion if someone leaves alot of 5stars it does not mean they are "abusing" anything because they probably had no problems with the player and liked how the game went. if they want to give out lots of stars sooo be it.

thank you, cute little baby!!! QFT!!!-0

owenshooter wrote:

Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.

i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0

yes if you move the arrow over the stars it tells you what each star level means now where it gets sticky like the old system is what someone considers average or above average, But again to answer your question lack built it into the system...

Soloman wrote:

owenshooter wrote:

Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.

i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0

yes if you move the arrow over the stars it tells you what each star level means now where it gets sticky like the old system is what someone considers average or above average, But again to answer your question lack built it into the system...

But where does it tell us what is "average" and what is "bad" and what is "excellent"? Last time I checked, it's all a matter of opinion.

White Moose wrote:

zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat

I wouldn't call that abusing, everyone has diffrent opinions on how their opponents plays. Perhaps those 2 just feels that if they just play a clean and good game that they deserve a 5've.

78 out of 78 players that deserve a 5? i don't think so. either he's playing only with the very elite players (and i don't mean skills) or he is just hading out random 5's which is abusing the system.

wicked wrote:zimmah, let's let people get used to the system first, and realize all 5's aren't really the way to go. I wouldn't classify it as abuse yet, as people are still getting used to how to rate.

so you're practictly telling it is true what i say.

i know though you're right, some people need more time to get used to common sence but if you do nothing against it, they might start to think it's normal what they do, which it's not. (or is it?)

Soloman wrote:

owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0

I think his argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.

yes, only i want to keep it simple for them