Conquer Club

The feedback category are: "Fair Play", "Attendance" & "Attitude".

Should I used the category "Fair Play" with a value of 1 to indicate that a player did a "dumb" move/play that will give the game away to another player (as a result of this move/play)?

your 'b' is upside down.

mibi wrote:your 'b' is upside down.

˙uʍop ǝpısdn sı "q" ɹnoʎ 'ou
but I agree with what you said.


Silver, Thats probably the best way you could do it with the system that is used now. I can't think of a better way....

wcaclimbing wrote:

mibi wrote:your 'b' is upside down.

˙uʍop ǝpısdn sı "q" ɹnoʎ 'ou
but I agree with what you said.


Silver, Thats probably the best way you could do it with the system that is used now. I can't think of a better way....

Alright, I'll bite... how did you do that text inversion?

And on topic... I don't think it's supposed to be part of the peer ratings. Lack said something about the new ratings now being about your skill, but the mushy stuff like whether you're fun to play with, if I recall correctly. I think the idea is that the medals were (along with score/win rt./rank) would pick up "dumb play", plus you can got write on the guys wall that he cost you the game... that his play sucked... etc. etc.

Silver- wrote:The feedback category are: "Fair Play", "Attendance" & "Attitude".

Should I used the category "Fair Play" with a value of 1 to indicate that a player did a "dump" move/play that will give the game away to another player (as a result of this move/play)?

Yes , a one (1) in "Fair play" = "Poor play"

Silver- wrote:The feedback category are: "Fair Play", "Attendance" & "Attitude".

Should I used the category "Fair Play" with a value of 1 to indicate that a player did a "dump" move/play that will give the game away to another player (as a result of this move/play)?

can you give a game number? often times a player is trying to win the game and comes up short in different styles of gameplay... escalating comes to mind... can you give a game number? or perhaps a better explaination? otherwise, it seems like you just want us to validate what you are about to do without a real discussion or input. thanks!-0

In a Flat rate bonus gane (Arms Race), once a player is close to winning the game (ex. alone on USA side, 15 on President & lunch code, starting the missile to get the 50 armies bonus) and 2 players on the USSR side have 30-40 armies each+.

I find it really "dumb" to try to just kill they other person on USSR side. This will block both of the player on the USSR side to try to block the other player from getting is bonus of 50 armies.

They only potential problem, is that if the 2 players work together to block the other player bonus, how this game can end...