Conquer Club

I was using the game finder to see what percentage of my games were 1v1 and it turned out to be over 50%
Is there anyone out there that's as obsessed with 1v1 games as I am?

I won't even try to count, but I do play a lot of 1v1.

Recently have gone back to assassin and speed to try and get more medals

I have been an avid 1v1 player in the past, and still play quite a few. Just nowhere near as many as I used to.

I've played like 2796 1v1 games...though look at my total game count

just playing my first.
Being creamed.
I'll need to play a few more to form an opinion.

I only play like 1/30 games or so... I just put "I don't play 1v1" becuase it's such a small percent.

My game mix is about 76% 1v1, 18% team, 8% singles, so I guess I love 1v1s!

There are a fair few out there (freemiums in particular) who only play 1v1s.

=waiting patiently for split 1v1 games to come out= (like a doubles game where each player controls 2 colours)


about 1/4 of my games are 1v1. they're fun but they have a higher percentage of games where the game is over because of a drop and who goes first or the dice in the first round.

edbeard wrote:=waiting patiently for split 1v1 games to come out= (like a doubles game where each player controls 2 colours)

could've sworn this was on lack's to do list somewhere. either pending or the actual to do...anyone know what I'm talking about?

1 to 1 works well for me. I usually don't fit in well with the 8 player dynamic. I'm bound to do something that'll piss someone off, keep someone from winning, "suicide", "gang up" on a higher rank just to get their points, or be a jerk because I won't let someone keep a bonus. Yep...heard it all here.

edbeard wrote:=waiting patiently for split 1v1 games to come out= (like a doubles game where each player controls 2 colours)

Why would you do that? If you controlled 5 red and 5 blue, vs 10 blue, what advantage would that give you?

retrocrush wrote:

edbeard wrote:=waiting patiently for split 1v1 games to come out= (like a doubles game where each player controls 2 colours)

Why would you do that? If you controlled 5 red and 5 blue, vs 10 blue, what advantage would that give you?

it'd be like a normal doubles game. you control red and green and the other guy controls yellow and blue. you can only attack with half of the guys at a time. only get your bonus for that colour.

edbeard wrote:

retrocrush wrote:

edbeard wrote:=waiting patiently for split 1v1 games to come out= (like a doubles game where each player controls 2 colours)

Why would you do that? If you controlled 5 red and 5 blue, vs 10 blue, what advantage would that give you?

it'd be like a normal doubles game. you control red and green and the other guy controls yellow and blue. you can only attack with half of the guys at a time. only get your bonus for that colour.

That has been suggested a few times, and with a terrific % support I might add. Unfortunately lack did not feel it even warranted a reply as to why, he completely ignored it.

By then I was getting to used to lacks style of just ignoring the system I was told they had in place to see if improvements could be made. Instead I now just yawn when I see he has taken up an idea without so much as a murmer from the community....so don't go hoping for anything too quick. He has the complete debacle of the rubbishy stars to resolve first.

I do play mostly 1v1's, i try and join tournaments that focus on 1v1

I play a lot of 2 player games. So far I have played 357 of them

edbeard wrote:

edbeard wrote:=waiting patiently for split 1v1 games to come out= (like a doubles game where each player controls 2 colours)

could've sworn this was on lack's to do list somewhere. either pending or the actual to do...anyone know what I'm talking about?

Do you mean this one? viewtopic.php?t=44540
I think it's been suggested more than once.

I've played almost 1000 2 player games, nearly all sequential. If anyone thinks they're good at those settings, send me a PM for an upcoming tournament. You'll start half of the games.

I play just about all 1v1, probably because I'm not a premium and only have 4 slots, so if I can get people to play rt, it goes relatively fast and I can win or lose faster...

almost exactly 50%... how cool am i?

i played a lot of 1vs1 in the past. i managed to keep my rank at FCS most of the time too, but ive recently avoided playing a lot of them these days and now my rank is captain.

they are like a good smoke. feels good at first but u always regret it after.

BaldAdonis wrote:

edbeard wrote:

edbeard wrote:=waiting patiently for split 1v1 games to come out= (like a doubles game where each player controls 2 colours)

could've sworn this was on lack's to do list somewhere. either pending or the actual to do...anyone know what I'm talking about?

Do you mean this one? viewtopic.php?t=44540

yea. that was it. not sure if it was the exact thread because I could've sworn it was somewhere on Lack's list. Obviously not though.

i play a lot of 1v1... probably like 800 of my 1000 or so are 1v1 i think

whitestazn88 wrote:i play a lot of 1v1... probably like 800 of my 1000 or so are 1v1 i think

842 to be exact.

lots on world, but low percentage of other games

52% of my games

any higher ranked players up for the challenge?