The classy conquerer

by **waynemgough** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:53 pm

Yet again our leader shows his class. His word means so much more than any single player on this site.

Perish the thought that you might have a valid arguement, or he might be wrong. You certainly won't get an apology, he's way too big a man to apologise. The foe list is an easier option.

look at game 2990737 for another classy performance from Scott-land.

by **Snorri1234** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:22 pm

waynemgough wrote:Yet again our leader shows his class. His word means so much more than any single player on this site.

Perish the thought that you might have a valid arguement, or he might be wrong. You certainly won't get an apology, he's way too big a man to apologise. The foe list is an easier option.

look at game 2990737 for another classy performance from Scott-land.

But...he isn't conquerer anymore is he?

by **happy2seeyou** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:27 pm

What are you trying to accomplish by making this thread? That Scott speaks his mind in games? News flash, he's been doing that since January 23, 2007 when he joined. :lol:

by **waynemgough** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:38 pm

happy2seeyou wrote:What are you trying to accomplish by making this thread? That Scott speaks his mind in games? News flash, he's been doing that since January 23, 2007 when he joined.

Speaking one's mind isn't a problem to me, i do it quite often myself. Speaking absolute rubbish is another thing.

Try reading the thread again!

by **Simon Viavant** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:40 pm

Moved in 5, 4, 3, 2, ...

by **comic boy** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:45 pm

As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him 8-)

by **happy2seeyou** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:46 pm

waynemgough wrote:
happy2seeyou wrote:What are you trying to accomplish by making this thread? That Scott speaks his mind in games? News flash, he's been doing that since January 23, 2007 when he joined.

Speaking one's mind isn't a problem to me, i do it quite often myself. Speaking absolute rubbish is another thing.

Try reading the thread again!

I don't need to read that whole game chat. It started off great:

2008-08-07 18:14:22 - Scott-Land: Wayne you noob-
2008-08-07 18:14:47 - Scott-Land: ohh no.... another threads gonna be made now
2008-08-08 03:27:36 - comic boy: true - all things are relative
2008-08-08 04:54:43 - waynemgough: you don't like it scott, tough shit
2008-08-08 04:55:22 - waynemgough: but letting you get that bonus from round 1, is like an extra cash
2008-08-08 07:45:20 - waynemgough: and making threads about your conduct, doesn't interest me in the slightest

by **hulmey** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:53 pm

comic boy wrote:As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Theres something called sportsmanship and class. And you also seem to be lacking in those quarters! If i saw you and scot-land on the rugby field , id rip you both a new arsehole!

by **waynemgough** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:54 pm

comic boy wrote:As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Like i just said, his outbursts don't bother me. Words over the net, but to talk rubbish and not have the backbone to stand up and say "sorry i was wrong". And to foe somebody for argueing their point. Shows a certain amount of class to me.

by **happy2seeyou** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:56 pm

Why don't you put him on your list to prevent any further games together and call it a day.

by **hulmey** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:59 pm

happy2seeyou wrote:Why don't you put him on your list to prevent any further games together and call it a day.

Or a mod could move it to the flame wars and we can roast scot over there :lol:

by **happy2seeyou** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:00 pm

hulmey wrote:
happy2seeyou wrote:Why don't you put him on your list to prevent any further games together and call it a day.

Or a mod could move it to the flame wars and we can roast scot over there

I thought there was already a few threads on him in Flame Wars. You must be late to the party.

by **wrestler1ump** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:01 pm

scott-land wrote:

i said it was a joke when i called him a noob- then he continues to yammer ..... so i threw him on ignore and left it alone

This quote sums up his personality. He foes someone over such a stupid and trivial issue. You may as well all foe me just for not liking scott. We have been roasting scott over in flame wars, maybe this thread should go there.

by **hulmey** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:02 pm

happy2seeyou wrote:
hulmey wrote:
happy2seeyou wrote:Why don't you put him on your list to prevent any further games together and call it a day.

Or a mod could move it to the flame wars and we can roast scot over there

I thought there was already a few threads on him in Flame Wars. You must be late to the party.

yeah just a few...abit infamous is the one minute conqueror, but another thread is never going to hurt!

by **waynemgough** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:06 pm

happy2seeyou wrote:Why don't you put him on your list to prevent any further games together and call it a day.

Obviously you have a problem comprehending where i'm coming from. Outbursts don't bother me, being on his foe list doesn't bother me.

Not having the decency to admit he's wrong is what this is about.

by **comic boy** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:07 pm

waynemgough wrote:
comic boy wrote:As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Like i just said, his outbursts don't bother me. Words over the net, but to talk rubbish and not have the backbone to stand up and say "sorry i was wrong". And to foe somebody for argueing their point. Shows a certain amount of class to me.

Actually im pretty sure ( from experience ) that he would have ignored you for percieved poor play rather than arguing, as I said ive argued with him a lot worse than that, once he realised that he got it wrong he would have taken you off the foe list as he has done to plenty of others. Trust me if you think Scott is unpopular then the people siding with you on this thread ( pathetic jealous slime bags like whump and hulmey ) are not the sort of shit you want to be assiociated with.

by **Haggis_McMutton** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:09 pm

hulmey wrote:
comic boy wrote:As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Theres something called sportsmanship and class. And you also seem to be lacking in those quarters! If i saw you and scot-land on the rugby field , id rip you both a new arsehole!

Ah, now that is class ...

The real question is, why do you assume that just because Scott has a high rank, we should all be mortified that he has

a certain amount of class

We didn`t elect him, he doesn`t represent us, as long as he isn`t cheating who the hell cares what he did or said? It`s between the two of you, keep it there.

Imagine I`d post about some lieutenant that claimed i suicided on him 11 times, and he ... *gasp* doesn`t provide proof... the horror ...

by **happy2seeyou** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:10 pm

I understand that you had your feeling hurt in this game... Making a thread is not going to help though. If you would have went to him privately maybe it could have been handled better.

by **Fruitcake** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:11 pm

hulmey wrote:
comic boy wrote:As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Theres something called sportsmanship and class. And you also seem to be lacking in those quarters! If i saw you and scot-land on the rugby field , id rip you both a new arsehole!

I would have thought a particulary harsh spear tackle would be more your style hulmey. Not that I ever did such a thing when I played that great game.

On topic, I have to agree with comic boy...not that I would ever have an outburst myself. :-^

by **wrestler1ump** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:11 pm

comic boy wrote:
waynemgough wrote:
comic boy wrote:As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Like i just said, his outbursts don't bother me. Words over the net, but to talk rubbish and not have the backbone to stand up and say "sorry i was wrong". And to foe somebody for argueing their point. Shows a certain amount of class to me.

Trust me if you think Scott is unpopular then the people siding with you on this thread ( pathetic jealous slime bags like whump and hulmey ) are not the sort of shit you want to be assiociated with.

Watch what you say about a classy individual such as myself. You have chickened out of many verbal sparrings and just proven yourself to be a bad person in general. No doubt there is a secret alliance going on somewhere between you and scott.

by **hulmey** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:12 pm

comic boy wrote:
waynemgough wrote:
comic boy wrote:As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Like i just said, his outbursts don't bother me. Words over the net, but to talk rubbish and not have the backbone to stand up and say "sorry i was wrong". And to foe somebody for argueing their point. Shows a certain amount of class to me.

Actually im pretty sure ( from experience ) that he would have ignored you for percieved poor play rather than arguing, as I said ive argued with him a lot worse than that, once he realised that he got it wrong he would have taken you off the foe list as he has done to plenty of others. Trust me if you think Scott is unpopular then the people siding with you on this thread ( pathetic jealous slime bags like whump and hulmey ) are not the sort of shit you want to be assiociated with.

Im not jealous of scot-land or you. Check the games i play. I play every kind of game going and just enjoy playing! Ive no desire to be in the top 20 or 100 or 250 or anything! I just think scot is arrogant, abusive and a very poor sportsman! I've played him once and he betrayed me just for points. Thats someone i would not want to associate with it.

Theres been many conqueror's and i have congratulated them all. Why is that people only have beef with this particular player?

by **comic boy** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:16 pm

hulmey wrote:
comic boy wrote:As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Theres something called sportsmanship and class. And you also seem to be lacking in those quarters! If i saw you and scot-land on the rugby field , id rip you both a new arsehole!

Yes its very classy to make threats on the net :lol:

As for the sportsmanship I think I will happily put up my perfect rating / zero neg feedbacks
plus the opinion of the majority of my opponents ( including I think the originator of this thread ) against the biased and ill informed rant of a mediocre player and universally despised nobody.

by **waynemgough** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:16 pm

comic boy wrote:
waynemgough wrote:
comic boy wrote:As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Like i just said, his outbursts don't bother me. Words over the net, but to talk rubbish and not have the backbone to stand up and say "sorry i was wrong". And to foe somebody for argueing their point. Shows a certain amount of class to me.

Actually im pretty sure ( from experience ) that he would have ignored you for percieved poor play rather than arguing, as I said ive argued with him a lot worse than that, once he realised that he got it wrong he would have taken you off the foe list as he has done to plenty of others. Trust me if you think Scott is unpopular then the people siding with you on this thread ( pathetic jealous slime bags like whump and hulmey ) are not the sort of shit you want to be assiociated with.

If that was the case, then why wasn't I on his foe list before the game. To break a bonus defended by 3armies in round 1, with nothing to lose. Is a move i would do again.

by **wrestler1ump** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:20 pm

comic boy wrote:
hulmey wrote:
comic boy wrote:As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Theres something called sportsmanship and class. And you also seem to be lacking in those quarters! If i saw you and scot-land on the rugby field , id rip you both a new arsehole!

Yes its very classy to make threats on the net
As for the sportsmanship I think I will happily put up my perfect rating / zero neg feedbacks
plus the opinion of the majority of my opponents ( including I think the originator of this thread ) against the biased and ill informed rant of a mediocre player and universally despised nobody.

Look who's talking you hypocrit.

by **hulmey** on Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:23 pm

comic boy wrote:
hulmey wrote:
comic boy wrote:As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Theres something called sportsmanship and class. And you also seem to be lacking in those quarters! If i saw you and scot-land on the rugby field , id rip you both a new arsehole!

Yes its very classy to make threats on the net
As for the sportsmanship I think I will happily put up my perfect rating / zero neg feedbacks
plus the opinion of the majority of my opponents ( including I think the originator of this thread ) against the biased and ill informed rant of a mediocre player and universally despised nobody.

Well thats what you get when you awaken the wild beast!! Ive never had any problem with you or played a match against you and/or even mentioned your name in a thread!! Coz ive attacked scot-land's persona you've jumped on me!! Anyways your thoughts dont matter me and i think thats vice-versa....

Have a toasty one comic boy

The classy conquerer

The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Re: The classy conquerer

Who is online