Ending interminable game
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:30 pmI'm in a three player game in which things largely stabilzed a while ago and seem unlikely to destabilize by normal means. I know the posted rules ban throwing games, but it seems fairer and neater to agree to bet the game on, for example, who gets another set after the fewest turns than to leave it to the whims of two players uniting against a third. There seem to be a lot of bad feelings in this game. Is there a "subrule," or administrative discretion, to permit this ? Game 3123027