Conquer Club

One must be able to define enriched criterias on whatever game he opens..
Not only the type of map, not only the style of game and if it is sequential or freestyle, also not only the fortification type whatever...
But also one should be given ability to set some additional setting on game s/he opens.. Such as one wud be able to define point space, so that only the ppl who are between that point space can join but others can not. In practice this means if you dont like low point players in your games, you will have an ability to set this by setting 1300 into min point to join entry field... Can also be defined another entry for maximum point as well . And maybe can be defined for percentage of taken turns..
I am writing a lot on this, nobody is paying attention... Whatever you ppl, this is a suggestion, it sells itself, i do earn nothing..
Regards..

One must be able to define enriched criterias on whatever game he opens..
Not only the type of map, not only the style of game and if it is sequential or freestyle, also not only the fortification type whatever...
But also one should be given ability to set some additional setting on game s/he opens.. Such as one wud be able to define point space, so that only the ppl who are between that point space can join but others can not. In practice this means if you dont like low point players in your games, you will have an ability to set this by setting 1300 into min point to join entry field... Can also be defined another entry for maximum point as well . And maybe can be defined for percentage of taken turns..
I am writing a lot on this, nobody is paying attention... Whatever you ppl, this is a suggestion, it sells itself, i do earn nothing..
Regards..

Suggested millions of times by higher ranked players and rejected every one of those times. This only helps the high ranks, which are not the largest part of the population.

Thread from Q&A merged in. HardAttack, please check your inbox.

HardAttack wrote:One must be able to define enriched criterias on whatever game he opens..
Not only the type of map, not only the style of game and if it is sequential or freestyle, also not only the fortification type whatever...
But also one should be given ability to set some additional setting on game s/he opens.. Such as one wud be able to define point space, so that only the ppl who are between that point space can join but others can not. In practice this means if you dont like low point players in your games, you will have an ability to set this by setting 1300 into min point to join entry field... Can also be defined another entry for maximum point as well . And maybe can be defined for percentage of taken turns..
I am writing a lot on this, nobody is paying attention... Whatever you ppl, this is a suggestion, it sells itself, i do earn nothing..
Regards..

I guess its one of the advantages of premium membership being able to create private games.

TeeGee has your simple solution to this perceived problem. ^

I exactly know what you mean...and i agree with you.

The Neon Peon wrote:Suggested millions of times by higher ranked players and rejected every one of those times. This only helps the high ranks, which are not the largest part of the population.

Yes you have to pay to get the settings you need .

I am taking something different from private thing and something different from freemium and premium...As far as i know those settings i tell in the text above are not defined to the premiums as well. Am i wrong ? This is strictly an offer nothing about freemium or premium.

If such offers ,which has no aim except to help things go better, bother pplsi can simply quit foruming. Just i can ask simple questionss, and have my feedback from others who knows the answers.. So do i bother or not ? Any answers will be easily understood, feel free

KoE_Sirius wrote:Yes you have to pay to get the settings you need .

Private games do not give what i tell in the text, but offers you the ability to select. I mean this, i want to open a game, will be open but only some defined point space will be able to join..Not a private game, neither a game cooks can come in and take a seat.. I have nothing special against cooks by the way ... Maybe cooks better to raise themselves in all cooks games then some in other ranks..
I dont say give such settings to freemium, give those all beauties to the premium section...On the other hand i will get my premium sooon in time..This is all about my being against of using credit cards. ı will ask one of my friends to pay on behalf of me and i will cash him. 25 dollars a year is nothing to mention about..

TeeGee wrote:

HardAttack wrote:One must be able to define enriched criterias on whatever game he opens..
Not only the type of map, not only the style of game and if it is sequential or freestyle, also not only the fortification type whatever...
But also one should be given ability to set some additional setting on game s/he opens.. Such as one wud be able to define point space, so that only the ppl who are between that point space can join but others can not. In practice this means if you dont like low point players in your games, you will have an ability to set this by setting 1300 into min point to join entry field... Can also be defined another entry for maximum point as well . And maybe can be defined for percentage of taken turns..
I am writing a lot on this, nobody is paying attention... Whatever you ppl, this is a suggestion, it sells itself, i do earn nothing..
Regards..

I guess its one of the advantages of premium membership being able to create private games.

I did dear fellow, thanks for warning me..this is something i realised after reading it, pardon me..this will not take place anymore..
tHE aim was not spamming but it was because i was not sure the subject belonged to which room. Because i wasnt sure, i wrote in some a few rooms..

lancehoch wrote:Thread from Q&A merged in. HardAttack, please check your inbox.

this would be sweet, i wouldn't have to play with HardAttack and the rest of the stripers that pollute up CC... JOKING...-0

...and yet so true.

HardAttack wrote:I am taking something different from private thing and something different from freemium and premium...As far as i know those settings i tell in the text above are not defined to the premiums as well. Am i wrong ? This is strictly an offer nothing about freemium or premium.

If such offers ,which has no aim except to help things go better, bother pplsi can simply quit foruming. Just i can ask simple questionss, and have my feedback from others who knows the answers.. So do i bother or not ? Any answers will be easily understood, feel free

KoE_Sirius wrote:Yes you have to pay to get the settings you need .

Actually .What you are asking for has been refused before .Its pointless flogging a dead horse .The only other option is to set up private games and invite whatever rank you want in your game .You don't have premium so you can't !

Don't you think that there must be a reason (or maybe two) for people asking this again and again?

IMHO, this deserves something else than just say "it has been asked again".

) My point is this, most of times low rank ppl tend to miss turns, or tend to stay far away from ethics...I dont say all are so, i say their probability is higher.. Dont make me write more and more, you know what i mean
Points what i get if i win and what i lose if i lose the game comes in 2nd place... And i agree with you, you with your 3000 like points, you must protect yourself against us

owenshooter wrote:this would be sweet, i wouldn't have to play with HardAttack and the rest of the stripers that pollute up CC... JOKING...-0

I am glad for such an answer oliver fellow. ty

OliverFA wrote:Don't you think that there must be a reason (or maybe two) for people asking this again and again?

IMHO, this deserves something else than just say "it has been asked again".

OliverFA wrote:Don't you think that there must be a reason (or maybe two) for people asking this again and again?

IMHO, this deserves something else than just say "it has been asked again".

Yeah just keep asking and maybe one day you'll get a different answer .

KoE_Sirius wrote:

OliverFA wrote:Don't you think that there must be a reason (or maybe two) for people asking this again and again?

IMHO, this deserves something else than just say "it has been asked again".

Yeah just keep asking and maybe one day you'll get a different answer .

highly doubtful

This suggestion has been suggested countless times hardattack, dont think youre putting something new up and it has been rejected every single time

I didn't know a lot of times this subject had been issued before. Maybe my fault that i should have searched if any issue took place among those millions of topics talked before. Anyway, i am sorry because of repetetion, and i believe responsibles are doing well on anything. The problem, as playerXXXX stated under some other topic, the problem is the variety of everyone asking similar but different things.
I found out some simple rules within 2 days after i PMed this message. Not fully functioning but removing the fog away a bit.
1st dont play with ? new recruits. Yea i had been new recruit as well. Thanks those who played with me but luckly i didnt abused them. Took my whole damn turns so far. Simple %100. Good for me.
2nd Look your opponents ratings, 4.7 is my line at which i look suspicious who has below 4.7 and ask myself why then decide to go or not to go.
3rd. I am finally looking at the turns taken percantage. Here under this criteria, my line is %98 minimum.

Games satisfying these 3 criterias i join in. One more, i use my foe list efficiently. Someone may pass from my criterias but still i may not like him/her then i put him/her in my foe list just because i dont want to play with him/her anymore. This is nothing to do with personal but all business, all because of i dont want to play anymore with that specific ppl

THanks