Conquer Club

Posted: **Sat Oct 25, 2008 2:43 pm**

ive read alot of threads about people complaining about classic, or lauding the admins for whatever about classic. but from the tone of most of the threads it seems everybody is missing something. the classic game is not gone, only the picture.....

classic art/classic shapes are the same play-wise. and if you loved playing classic, there is NO difference in play between classic/classic art/classic shapes. so why would anyone want to leave based on something that doesnt make ANY difference to the game at all? seems retarded to me.

Posted: **Sat Oct 25, 2008 2:45 pm**

Bitching is fun?

Posted: **Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:37 pm**

Neoteny wrote:Bitching is fun?

more fun than playing games?

Posted: **Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:41 pm**

hwhrhett wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Bitching is fun?

more fun than playing games?

As his compatriots told Pickett just before his run on the Union Army at Gettysburg, "You have a knack for stating the obvious and trivializing the important."

Posted: **Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:43 pm**

the CC picture is better than the board game

Posted: **Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:54 pm**

Stephen Wayne wrote:the CC picture is better than the board game

???

Conquer Club isn't available as a board game!

Posted: **Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:33 pm**

The Classic Art has grown on me and yes the game play is no different.

I think however the main problem was that many folks, including myself where in the middle of several games. The game play may be the same but how the eyes descern the map it was easy to lose track of armies on the board. Since the change I have made several gaffes because I misread the map. The Lucky Charms map was also a shock to the eyes.

Now that a week has passed i am having no problem playing the classic art map. In fact I find it very educational as well as enjoyable.

Posted: **Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:38 pm**

think that the new game image is shit and I don't think they should call it classic at all. I have found other maps that I like though, so i will be playing them now. And yes, that was total ASS the way you started a game and was switched to a completely different game in the process. TOTAL ASS!

Posted: **Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm**

hwhrhett wrote:there is NO difference in play between classic/classic art/classic shapes.

Posted: **Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:58 am**

hwhrhett wrote:ive read alot of threads about people complaining about classic, or lauding the admins for whatever about classic. but from the tone of most of the threads it seems everybody is missing something. the classic game is not gone, only the picture.....

classic art/classic shapes are the same play-wise. and if you loved playing classic, there is NO difference in play between classic/classic art/classic shapes. so why would anyone want to leave based on something that doesnt make ANY difference to the game at all? seems retarded to me.

You have a valid point in what you're saying, game play doesn't change but tbh.... who would you rather bang? Someone that was smoking hot or someone that was pretty on the inside ( not that inside) ?

The Classic maps are just not attractive. Don't get me wrong, I don't mind playing Art ( although the terr's are misleading when you're attacking because of the lengths of the rectangles) but Shapes are a bit confusing. I confuse Mongolia for China on that map.

Posted: **Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:26 am**

Scott-Land wrote: but Shapes are a bit confusing. I confuse Mongolia for China on that map.

What are these strange and mysterious lands you talk about?

Conquer Club

a secret about classic...

a secret about classic...

Re: a secret about classic...

Re: a secret about classic...

Re: a secret about classic...

Re: a secret about classic...

Re: a secret about classic...

Re: a secret about classic...

Re: a secret about classic...

Re: a secret about classic...

Re: a secret about classic...

Re: a secret about classic...