Page 1 of 1

New Game Option?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:34 am
by L M S
The truce in a three player game tactic is annoying and considered by me to be a way of cheating... it is borderline in a 4 person game for that matter. How about a "no truce option" when creating games?

Re: New Game Option?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:41 am
by BaldAdonis
How would you enforce that? Most of the time I play flat rate/no cards and it gets down to three players, two of them will work together against a third stronger one, and the balance of power will shift many times over the game without any truce being mentioned. It's pretty clear that they are working together, but that's just good play.

Re: New Game Option?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:42 am
by Jeff Hardy
would be a silly game type
also, in 1 vs 1 vs 1 its obvious that you are not going to attack the weaker player

Re: New Game Option?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:53 am
by Vace Cooper
Jeff Hardy wrote:would be a silly game type
also, in 1 vs 1 vs 1 its obvious that you are not going to attack the weaker player

Well put.. I wish more people understood that!

Re: New Game Option?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:34 pm
by L M S
I understand it would be impossible to enforce, really I guess I'm just irritated. You bust your ass to get an advantage and when you do using sound strategy, three people team up against you and you are helpless......just blowing off steam I suppose.......

Re: New Game Option?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:42 pm
by william18
There's a truce potion?

Re: New Game Option?

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 12:39 am
by hammocksleeper
Working together in three player games just makes sense...it is not cheating, it is a part of the game. I can't stand the people that complain about this shit.

Re: New Game Option?

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 1:36 am
by saraith
william18 wrote:There's a truce potion?

I call it beer.

Re: New Game Option?

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 9:31 am
by Twill
I'll go ahead and say that this isn't going to happen for the sole reason that it would be impossible to inforce.

However, send a PM off to glide who is currently overseeing the xiGAMES clan who plays only no-truce games and enforce it within their clan. If you're playing xi, you wont face any sort of alliances at all.

Twill

Re: New Game Option?

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:08 pm
by L M S
unless there was a " report illegal alliance button" in game, when the options were set to not allow them.... hmmmm

Re: New Game Option?

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:49 pm
by BaldAdonis
L M S wrote:You bust your ass to get an advantage and when you do using sound strategy, three people team up against you and you are helpless.

Why do you think it's sound strategy to appear to be the strongest? Sounds like a pretty bad strategy to me.... everyone will just want to attack you.

Re: New Game Option?

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:50 pm
by THE ARMY
Truces are part of the game. The point of the CC is to win and if coming up with a temporary truce to hold a leader then it should be done. Everyone should do anything they can to win. War is half the battle, polotics is the other half.