Moderator: Community Team
You should have no problem bringing your score up to Eq. status.bridge2far wrote:man, just give it a rest.
If everyone played for EQ the whole system would be mest.
you'd have chefs at the top of the scoreboard, and if you really planned on becoming #1 on an equalarian scoreboard, like.. ffs seriously think about it.
You wouldn't be starting any games, you'd just be waiting for someone with the exact same rank to start a game and then join it.
it would just be an ugly system and nobody will agree with having it, so please, give your dumb logic rants a rest.
About 10 minutes.The Neon Peon wrote:Well done... how long did you spend on this?
I have always wanted to ask... you specialize, which is a sub-group of farming, so why do you keep on posting stuff like this? Sorry for going a little off topic with this.
Calm down my brother. Please allow me to explain something to you.bridge2far wrote:ugh. porky, you really just don't think do you.
yes, this new scoreboard may fck it all up for noob farmers, BUT it will also fck it up for 90% of all CC'ers.
so if i wanted to get to the highest score and highest relative rank i could i would have to solely play high ranked players, correct? so if i start a game and even 2 chefs join, ohh crap, there goes my relative rank for that game...
so then i would start searching for games that are par with my rank so as to achieve a better relative rank..
then what happens? if x amount of people start doing the exact same thing because they want to gain a higher place on the scoreboard all you have is people searching for games of the same relative rank and this site becomes just a bunch of snobs..
it would end up becoming a problem worse than farming is now because if your a chef, your screwed and will only be able to play other chefs... which for most of them joining those games with high rankers and seeing there ass get cooked is there enjoyment.
go get some sound understanding, some actual logic, and some real skill... then come back and re think this whole idea.
ps
no, i really don't give 2 shyts about my relative rank and all that bs..
but also i think farmers that take it to an extreme, such as max, are no longer tolerable on this site.
YOU ARE.THE ARMY wrote:what is EQ?
porkenbeans wrote: Calm down my brother. Please allow me to explain something to you.
The map rank is not your rank. You do not have to have the highest M.R. You only have to maintain an EQ. status. Who has the highest M.R. does not matter whatsoever in this respect. MAP RANK is only a tool to show if a player is Noob farming or not. Non farmers will have no problem maintaining an E.Q. status.
porkenbeans wrote:3/4 of my games are played on my 3 favorite maps. This is not out of the ordinary.
You may say that this is specializing, Well everybody must be specialists, because most everybody has these same type of stats. Besides, there is nothing wrong if people play any map a lot and get good at it, THAT IS WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT. Your whole "sub farming group" premise, is flawed to the core.
"Farming" is specifically attributed to those that go after noobs.
Your logic and reasoning on this is just NOT right.
I start most of my public games too, but am E.Q. I have played 40 maps.Aradhus wrote:porkenbeans wrote: Calm down my brother. Please allow me to explain something to you.
The map rank is not your rank. You do not have to have the highest M.R. You only have to maintain an EQ. status. Who has the highest M.R. does not matter whatsoever in this respect. MAP RANK is only a tool to show if a player is Noob farming or not. Non farmers will have no problem maintaining an E.Q. status.
That's a load of bullshit. For one thing you can't control who joins public games. My mr is point hoarder and I don't farm. I look for public games with the highest ranked players in them.porkenbeans wrote:3/4 of my games are played on my 3 favorite maps. This is not out of the ordinary.
You may say that this is specializing, Well everybody must be specialists, because most everybody has these same type of stats. Besides, there is nothing wrong if people play any map a lot and get good at it, THAT IS WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT. Your whole "sub farming group" premise, is flawed to the core.
"Farming" is specifically attributed to those that go after noobs.
Your logic and reasoning on this is just NOT right.
This is also bullshit, if you actually offered some information instead of throwing out blanket claims with nothing to back it up. Everybody doesn't 'specialise'. I try to play as many different maps as I can, and playing the same map, same setting, etc, might not be farming per se, buts its a white knuckle, edge of the, fingertipped, borderline step pretty damn close. It also gives a skewed impression of how good a CC player is when they've played 2000 games and have like 4000 points.
But they only know how to play on three maps.
Statistics are like assholes. Shit comes out, dick goes in.
porkenbeans wrote:Calm down my brother. Please allow me to explain something to you.bridge2far wrote:ugh. porky, you really just don't think do you.
yes, this new scoreboard may fck it all up for noob farmers, BUT it will also fck it up for 90% of all CC'ers.
so if i wanted to get to the highest score and highest relative rank i could i would have to solely play high ranked players, correct? so if i start a game and even 2 chefs join, ohh crap, there goes my relative rank for that game...
so then i would start searching for games that are par with my rank so as to achieve a better relative rank..
then what happens? if x amount of people start doing the exact same thing because they want to gain a higher place on the scoreboard all you have is people searching for games of the same relative rank and this site becomes just a bunch of snobs..
it would end up becoming a problem worse than farming is now because if your a chef, your screwed and will only be able to play other chefs... which for most of them joining those games with high rankers and seeing there ass get cooked is there enjoyment.
go get some sound understanding, some actual logic, and some real skill... then come back and re think this whole idea.
ps
no, i really don't give 2 shyts about my relative rank and all that bs..
but also i think farmers that take it to an extreme, such as max, are no longer tolerable on this site.
The map rank is not your rank. You do not have to have the highest M.R. You only have to maintain an EQ. status. Who has the highest M.R. does not matter whatsoever in this respect. MAP RANK is only a tool to show if a player is Noob farming or not. Non farmers will have no problem maintaining an E.Q. status. I would be happy to show you just how easy it would be for you to raise your M.R. to E.Q. I will tell you exactly which maps that you need to play to do this. For you it will take only a couple of games against high rankers on these maps.This will be achieved if you win or loose those games.
By this time next week you could be an EQUILATARIAN. and fully deserving of your rank of General.Give me a pm if you are interested. I have been known to be a friendly and helpful person, and I would be glad to help. I could also show you how to install M.R. and how to use it properly.
Unique defeats are also include with the other various stats at M.R.FabledIntegral wrote:You're missing the point. Equalitarian isn't any more respectable to half the people on this site. It merely shows you play the same pool of players over an over again.
Mr Changsha wrote:porkenbeans wrote:Calm down my brother. Please allow me to explain something to you.bridge2far wrote:ugh. porky, you really just don't think do you.
yes, this new scoreboard may fck it all up for noob farmers, BUT it will also fck it up for 90% of all CC'ers.
so if i wanted to get to the highest score and highest relative rank i could i would have to solely play high ranked players, correct? so if i start a game and even 2 chefs join, ohh crap, there goes my relative rank for that game...
so then i would start searching for games that are par with my rank so as to achieve a better relative rank..
then what happens? if x amount of people start doing the exact same thing because they want to gain a higher place on the scoreboard all you have is people searching for games of the same relative rank and this site becomes just a bunch of snobs..
it would end up becoming a problem worse than farming is now because if your a chef, your screwed and will only be able to play other chefs... which for most of them joining those games with high rankers and seeing there ass get cooked is there enjoyment.
go get some sound understanding, some actual logic, and some real skill... then come back and re think this whole idea.
ps
no, i really don't give 2 shyts about my relative rank and all that bs..
but also i think farmers that take it to an extreme, such as max, are no longer tolerable on this site.
The map rank is not your rank. You do not have to have the highest M.R. You only have to maintain an EQ. status. Who has the highest M.R. does not matter whatsoever in this respect. MAP RANK is only a tool to show if a player is Noob farming or not. Non farmers will have no problem maintaining an E.Q. status. I would be happy to show you just how easy it would be for you to raise your M.R. to E.Q. I will tell you exactly which maps that you need to play to do this. For you it will take only a couple of games against high rankers on these maps.This will be achieved if you win or loose those games.
By this time next week you could be an EQUILATARIAN. and fully deserving of your rank of General.Give me a pm if you are interested. I have been known to be a friendly and helpful person, and I would be glad to help. I could also show you how to install M.R. and how to use it properly.
I bolded the bit I found most interesting..
I am beginning to believe that porkenbeans is a spoof. There is simply NO WAY an otherwise rational person could believe what he has been writing here for the last few days. He must be a spoof.
bridge2far wrote:Mr Changsha wrote:porkenbeans wrote:Calm down my brother. Please allow me to explain something to you.bridge2far wrote:ugh. porky, you really just don't think do you.
yes, this new scoreboard may fck it all up for noob farmers, BUT it will also fck it up for 90% of all CC'ers.
so if i wanted to get to the highest score and highest relative rank i could i would have to solely play high ranked players, correct? so if i start a game and even 2 chefs join, ohh crap, there goes my relative rank for that game...
so then i would start searching for games that are par with my rank so as to achieve a better relative rank..
then what happens? if x amount of people start doing the exact same thing because they want to gain a higher place on the scoreboard all you have is people searching for games of the same relative rank and this site becomes just a bunch of snobs..
it would end up becoming a problem worse than farming is now because if your a chef, your screwed and will only be able to play other chefs... which for most of them joining those games with high rankers and seeing there ass get cooked is there enjoyment.
go get some sound understanding, some actual logic, and some real skill... then come back and re think this whole idea.
ps
no, i really don't give 2 shyts about my relative rank and all that bs..
but also i think farmers that take it to an extreme, such as max, are no longer tolerable on this site.
The map rank is not your rank. You do not have to have the highest M.R. You only have to maintain an EQ. status. Who has the highest M.R. does not matter whatsoever in this respect. MAP RANK is only a tool to show if a player is Noob farming or not. Non farmers will have no problem maintaining an E.Q. status. I would be happy to show you just how easy it would be for you to raise your M.R. to E.Q. I will tell you exactly which maps that you need to play to do this. For you it will take only a couple of games against high rankers on these maps.This will be achieved if you win or loose those games.
By this time next week you could be an EQUILATARIAN. and fully deserving of your rank of General.Give me a pm if you are interested. I have been known to be a friendly and helpful person, and I would be glad to help. I could also show you how to install M.R. and how to use it properly.
I bolded the bit I found most interesting..
I am beginning to believe that porkenbeans is a spoof. There is simply NO WAY an otherwise rational person could believe what he has been writing here for the last few days. He must be a spoof.
Also referring to the bolded part...
Sounds as if your recruiting for some sort of cult.
by any chance, are you a jehovahs witness?
porkenbeans wrote:I start most of my public games too, but am E.Q. I have played 40 maps.Aradhus wrote:porkenbeans wrote: Calm down my brother. Please allow me to explain something to you.
The map rank is not your rank. You do not have to have the highest M.R. You only have to maintain an EQ. status. Who has the highest M.R. does not matter whatsoever in this respect. MAP RANK is only a tool to show if a player is Noob farming or not. Non farmers will have no problem maintaining an E.Q. status.
That's a load of bullshit. For one thing you can't control who joins public games. My mr is point hoarder and I don't farm. I look for public games with the highest ranked players in them.porkenbeans wrote:3/4 of my games are played on my 3 favorite maps. This is not out of the ordinary.
You may say that this is specializing, Well everybody must be specialists, because most everybody has these same type of stats. Besides, there is nothing wrong if people play any map a lot and get good at it, THAT IS WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT. Your whole "sub farming group" premise, is flawed to the core.
"Farming" is specifically attributed to those that go after noobs.
Your logic and reasoning on this is just NOT right.
This is also bullshit, if you actually offered some information instead of throwing out blanket claims with nothing to back it up. Everybody doesn't 'specialise'. I try to play as many different maps as I can, and playing the same map, same setting, etc, might not be farming per se, buts its a white knuckle, edge of the, fingertipped, borderline step pretty damn close. It also gives a skewed impression of how good a CC player is when they've played 2000 games and have like 4000 points.
But they only know how to play on three maps.
Statistics are like assholes. Shit comes out, dick goes in.
Yes, it used to be the other way around. I actually like multi-player games the best. Then one day I caught A multi, scum, cheater.Aradhus wrote:porkenbeans wrote:I start most of my public games too, but am E.Q. I have played 40 maps.Aradhus wrote:porkenbeans wrote: Calm down my brother. Please allow me to explain something to you.
The map rank is not your rank. You do not have to have the highest M.R. You only have to maintain an EQ. status. Who has the highest M.R. does not matter whatsoever in this respect. MAP RANK is only a tool to show if a player is Noob farming or not. Non farmers will have no problem maintaining an E.Q. status.
That's a load of bullshit. For one thing you can't control who joins public games. My mr is point hoarder and I don't farm. I look for public games with the highest ranked players in them.porkenbeans wrote:3/4 of my games are played on my 3 favorite maps. This is not out of the ordinary.
You may say that this is specializing, Well everybody must be specialists, because most everybody has these same type of stats. Besides, there is nothing wrong if people play any map a lot and get good at it, THAT IS WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT. Your whole "sub farming group" premise, is flawed to the core.
"Farming" is specifically attributed to those that go after noobs.
Your logic and reasoning on this is just NOT right.
This is also bullshit, if you actually offered some information instead of throwing out blanket claims with nothing to back it up. Everybody doesn't 'specialise'. I try to play as many different maps as I can, and playing the same map, same setting, etc, might not be farming per se, buts its a white knuckle, edge of the, fingertipped, borderline step pretty damn close. It also gives a skewed impression of how good a CC player is when they've played 2000 games and have like 4000 points.
But they only know how to play on three maps.
Statistics are like assholes. Shit comes out, dick goes in.
Almost all of your games are 1v1s.. almost as in like 1000 out of 1100...
Most of my games are 8 players..
porkenbeans wrote:Yes, it used to be the other way around. I actually like multi-player games the best. Then one day I caught A multi, scum, cheater.
I had been stuck at sarge for a prolonged period at the time. And I thought that maybe there were games that I had been cheated, and didnt even know. So I decided to test my suspicions. I only entered or started games that could not be rigged. You cant multi in a 1V1, so most of my games became that type. Guess what friend, My rank shot up. I was being promoted every 6 or 7 games. My rank has steadily gone up every sense then. I missed the big multi-player games though. So, I decided to try and find a way to bring them back into my game.
I formed the CLEAN GROUP. It was not without its set backs, as the very first week a member was caught with a multi, adamk89. It has been a couple of months now, and we have close to 75 members. I am glad to have the big game back again.
Alas, I am weary though of arguing with you un-skilled Farmers.
You are not here to thoughtfully discuss anything. You are simply here to shout down anything that would hinder your rape of the Noob. And I am not going to give this as much time, as I have been lately. Nothing but Juvenalistic sparing is going on anyway. The same lame and discredited claims just follow on to the next thread. I have other things that I would rather be doing.
Like getting with chip, and doing what I can to further the development of MAP RANK. FYI, I am sure that M.R. will be used by more and more players. So, you guys may want to think of bringing on some new posters. I predict, that, your attempt at dominating the forums, ...is going to be getting, a little more difficult.![]()
You have played 1/3 of all your games on 3 maps.Aradhus wrote:porkenbeans wrote:Yes, it used to be the other way around. I actually like multi-player games the best. Then one day I caught A multi, scum, cheater.
I had been stuck at sarge for a prolonged period at the time. And I thought that maybe there were games that I had been cheated, and didnt even know. So I decided to test my suspicions. I only entered or started games that could not be rigged. You cant multi in a 1V1, so most of my games became that type. Guess what friend, My rank shot up. I was being promoted every 6 or 7 games. My rank has steadily gone up every sense then. I missed the big multi-player games though. So, I decided to try and find a way to bring them back into my game.
I formed the CLEAN GROUP. It was not without its set backs, as the very first week a member was caught with a multi, adamk89. It has been a couple of months now, and we have close to 75 members. I am glad to have the big game back again.
Alas, I am weary though of arguing with you un-skilled Farmers.
You are not here to thoughtfully discuss anything. You are simply here to shout down anything that would hinder your rape of the Noob. And I am not going to give this as much time, as I have been lately. Nothing but Juvenalistic sparing is going on anyway. The same lame and discredited claims just follow on to the next thread. I have other things that I would rather be doing.
Like getting with chip, and doing what I can to further the development of MAP RANK. FYI, I am sure that M.R. will be used by more and more players. So, you guys may want to think of bringing on some new posters. I predict, that, your attempt at dominating the forums, ...is going to be getting, a little more difficult.![]()
I'm not a farmer.. Which you would know..if you read my posts.. in this topic, that you've posted in a half dozen times.. responding to my posts.. which you would have to read.. and understand..for your reponses to make sense.. oh
By the way, playing the same three maps, in 1v1s, is pretty close to being a good definition of "unskilled".
porkenbeans wrote:You have played 1/3 of all your games on 3 maps.
"clueless thought process", That is the best black kettle claim that I've heard in a while.Aradhus wrote:porkenbeans wrote:You have played 1/3 of all your games on 3 maps.
See this is the sort of thing I'm talking about when I say you put nothing in, and out of it you create trash. There's no real information involved, when you insert nothing into a subjective predisosed thought processs/machine to create statistics or "information", what comes out is information about the thought process/machine itself, not the original "nothing" data.
I've only completed 340 games and 80 of those were classic. Remove classic and you can't say that out of all the games on the remaining 74 maps that I've played, a third of those are on the same three maps.
There are pretty obvious reasons why I've played more classic that any other map.. One of them being that people used to make a lot more classic games that anything else.
But, like I said, you take nothing, insert it into a clueless thought process, and you get a whole bunch of nothing masquerading as statistics, useful data, etc.
porkenbeans wrote:"clueless thought process", That is the best black kettle claim that I've heard in a while.
Try to follow this Thought process, wont you ? Ill try to to go slow.
How many different maps a person plays is of no consequence. If a person played all of his games on a single map, That would be his own strategy to advance. Everyone has the freedom here to develop whatever kind of strat. that they choose.
I just cant understand this silly notion that that is somehow unfair. How is trying to be the best, anything like farming Noobs ? Its like a kid that says after loosing a spelling bee, "Oh it was not fair, The other person studied the word more than me".
COME ON DUDE, get your thought processes in gear.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
porkenbeans wrote:You have played 1/3 of all your games on 3 maps.Aradhus wrote:porkenbeans wrote:Yes, it used to be the other way around. I actually like multi-player games the best. Then one day I caught A multi, scum, cheater.
I had been stuck at sarge for a prolonged period at the time. And I thought that maybe there were games that I had been cheated, and didnt even know. So I decided to test my suspicions. I only entered or started games that could not be rigged. You cant multi in a 1V1, so most of my games became that type. Guess what friend, My rank shot up. I was being promoted every 6 or 7 games. My rank has steadily gone up every sense then. I missed the big multi-player games though. So, I decided to try and find a way to bring them back into my game.
I formed the CLEAN GROUP. It was not without its set backs, as the very first week a member was caught with a multi, adamk89. It has been a couple of months now, and we have close to 75 members. I am glad to have the big game back again.
Alas, I am weary though of arguing with you un-skilled Farmers.
You are not here to thoughtfully discuss anything. You are simply here to shout down anything that would hinder your rape of the Noob. And I am not going to give this as much time, as I have been lately. Nothing but Juvenalistic sparing is going on anyway. The same lame and discredited claims just follow on to the next thread. I have other things that I would rather be doing.
Like getting with chip, and doing what I can to further the development of MAP RANK. FYI, I am sure that M.R. will be used by more and more players. So, you guys may want to think of bringing on some new posters. I predict, that, your attempt at dominating the forums, ...is going to be getting, a little more difficult.![]()
I'm not a farmer.. Which you would know..if you read my posts.. in this topic, that you've posted in a half dozen times.. responding to my posts.. which you would have to read.. and understand..for your reponses to make sense.. oh
By the way, playing the same three maps, in 1v1s, is pretty close to being a good definition of "unskilled".
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users