Open apology to lanyards

by **e_i_pi** on Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:00 am

You got caught up with maxatstuy, and were in the same firing line when I was levelling my aim at him. Whether you accept it or not, I'm openly apologising, and withdrawing accusations against you.

I still believe that max is guilty of everything I accused him of, including sniffing bums.

by **DAT_WAT_SHE_SAID** on Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:09 am

e_i_pi wrote:I still believe that max is guilty of everything I accused him of, including sniffing bums.

I agree, he sniffs bums

by **Bones2484** on Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:27 am

Co-conspirators, whether they did the work or not, still are guilty. I hardly think Lanyards is faultless in all this.

*edit: Or he is just trusting to a fault and is completely blind to what's going on around him. Hopefully he chooses better "friends" in the future.

by **hulmey** on Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:44 am

Bones2484 wrote:Co-conspirators, whether they did the work or not, still are guilty. I hardly think Lanyards is faultless in all this.

*edit: Or he is just trusting to a fault and is completely blind to what's going on around him. Hopefully he chooses better "friends" in the future.

thank god you will never be a judge!!

by **BaldAdonis** on Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:15 am

He cheated just as much as max did, he just didn't put in as much time or effort. He's still a cheat.

by **Fruitcake** on Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:23 am

hulmey wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:Co-conspirators, whether they did the work or not, still are guilty. I hardly think Lanyards is faultless in all this.

*edit: Or he is just trusting to a fault and is completely blind to what's going on around him. Hopefully he chooses better "friends" in the future.

thank god you will never be a judge!!

Why would it matter if he was a Judge? It is the Jury that decide whether guilt is proven or not, what is it with you Hulmey, just about every post you make further confirms how very stupid you are.

Back on topic, cheat or not, the words company, judged by, and keep do spring to mind.

by **hulmey** on Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:35 am

Fruitcake wrote:
hulmey wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:Co-conspirators, whether they did the work or not, still are guilty. I hardly think Lanyards is faultless in all this.

*edit: Or he is just trusting to a fault and is completely blind to what's going on around him. Hopefully he chooses better "friends" in the future.

thank god you will never be a judge!!

Why would it matter if he was a Judge? It is the Jury that decide whether guilt is proven or not, what is it with you Hulmey, just about every post you make further confirms how very stupid you are.

Back on topic, cheat or not, the words company, judged by, and keep do spring to mind.

judges have a number of different powers. Why dont you stop being so grumpy and narrow minded. Click on the below link to get educated old man!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge

Furthermore, i see im on your foe list, so please do me a favour and dont read my posts, funny man.

by **Fruitcake** on Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:41 am

hulmey wrote:
Fruitcake wrote:
hulmey wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:Co-conspirators, whether they did the work or not, still are guilty. I hardly think Lanyards is faultless in all this.

*edit: Or he is just trusting to a fault and is completely blind to what's going on around him. Hopefully he chooses better "friends" in the future.

thank god you will never be a judge!!

Why would it matter if he was a Judge? It is the Jury that decide whether guilt is proven or not, what is it with you Hulmey, just about every post you make further confirms how very stupid you are.

Back on topic, cheat or not, the words company, judged by, and keep do spring to mind.

judges have a number of different powers. Why dont you stop being so grumpy and narrow minded. Click on the below link to get educated old man!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge

Furthermore, i see im on your foe list, so please do me a favour and dont read my posts, funny man.

Whooosh...as usual subtlety goes straight over the top of your head. I will read what posts I wish to read, I certainly won't be taking instruction on that from someone who needs to keep his knuckles taped up to avoid scraping them too badly.

by **FarangDemon** on Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:55 am

What surprises me the most is that a guy who designed what is commonly hailed as the most popular difficult map decides it is a good use of his time to help his buddy get to the top by playing new recruits.

Wouldn't it be really boring and pointless? Especially for a person complex enough to design such an involved map.

by **JimRocky** on Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:03 am

e_i_pi wrote:You got caught up with maxatstuy, and were in the same firing line when I was levelling my aim at him. Whether you accept it or not, I'm openly apologising, and withdrawing accusations against you.

I still believe that max is guilty of everything I accused him of, including sniffing bums.

You know sniffing bums isn't so bad IF they are the right bums. Granted, a general all around bum sniffer isn't choosing wisely.

by **Bones2484** on Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:44 pm

hulmey wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:Co-conspirators, whether they did the work or not, still are guilty. I hardly think Lanyards is faultless in all this.

*edit: Or he is just trusting to a fault and is completely blind to what's going on around him. Hopefully he chooses better "friends" in the future.

thank god you will never be a judge!!

Thank god you have left the site!!

Oh wait...