Conquer Club

Valid Question

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Valid Question

Postby Prankcall on Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:00 pm

This brings to mind the Blanket Block some players wrongly received due to Max and his antics.I'm wondering if we can now have this block lifted? Please don't respond saying send an E-Ticket as I done this numerous times.
Image
Sergeant 1st Class Prankcall
 
Posts: 741
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:38 am
Location: Grand Rapids,Michigan

Re: Valid Question

Postby JOHNNYROCKET24 on Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:28 pm

Prankcall wrote:This brings to mind the Blanket Block some players wrongly received due to Max and his antics.I'm wondering if we can now have this block lifted? Please don't respond saying send an E-Ticket as I done this numerous times.

how do you receive a "blanket block" wrongly? Your blocked for a reason. The mods dont throw a dart at a board and select the person(s) name that it hits and blocks them.
JR's Game Profile

show
User avatar
Captain JOHNNYROCKET24
 
Posts: 5514
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
Location: among the leets
52


Re: Valid Question

Postby Bruceswar on Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:53 pm

I have to agree here. Max was blocked with about 30 people, most them noteworthy. They then would block all these players from each other. Terrible if you ask me.The reason is fear of max playing multiple accounts at once. Now max is gone. Legit question to a terrible ruling to begin with. Should have only been max with everybody.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Valid Question

Postby Jeff Hardy on Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:14 pm

why were you guys even blocked in the first place?

and dont give me the max story, i know what happened, i want to know why (for example)herpes cant play spartans
General Jeff Hardy
 
Posts: 1338
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:22 am
Location: Matt Hardy's account, you can play against me there

Re: Valid Question

Postby Vace Cooper on Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:14 pm

Aradhus wrote:Could someone enlighten me as to what a "blanket block" is?

It sounds like a pretty snugly warm and comfortable block.
Image
owen is a sexy mother f***er
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Vace Cooper
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: MN

Re: Valid Question

Postby Bruceswar on Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:15 pm

Jeff Hardy wrote:why were you guys even blocked in the first place?

and dont give me the max story, i know what happened, i want to know why (for example)herpes cant play spartans



It was a lame ruling. That is the main reason.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Valid Question

Postby jpliberty on Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:49 pm

Bruceswar wrote:I have to agree here. Max was blocked with about 30 people, most them noteworthy. They then would block all these players from each other. Terrible if you ask me.The reason is fear of max playing multiple accounts at once. Now max is gone. Legit question to a terrible ruling to begin with. Should have only been max with everybody.


what the bleep does this mean? No one could follow this...this is an absolutely unintelligible bunch of nonsense. For example: Noteworthy? What is that? Max was blocked, you say, with about 30. Was that ok, was it not?

I cannot follow this. Then, I don't follow the kind of twisted logic which most of those who have played with people like Max and Scott-Land, etc. All are cheats.
I'd rather rule in hell than serve in heaven.
User avatar
Lieutenant jpliberty
 
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 2:21 pm
Location: United States

Re: Valid Question

Postby jpliberty on Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:50 pm

jpliberty wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:I have to agree here. Max was blocked with about 30 people, most them noteworthy. They then would block all these players from each other. Terrible if you ask me.The reason is fear of max playing multiple accounts at once. Now max is gone. Legit question to a terrible ruling to begin with. Should have only been max with everybody.


what the bleep does this mean? No one could follow this...this is an absolutely unintelligible bunch of nonsense. For example: Noteworthy? What is that? Max was blocked, you say, with about 30. Was that ok, was it not?

I cannot follow this. Then, I don't follow the kind of twisted logic which most of those who have played with people like Max and Scott-Land, etc. All are cheats.



Either you actually know how to play or you do not. ANYONE who must play with others does not know how to play. And, anyone who'd post something like Bruce did, well, can't think either
I'd rather rule in hell than serve in heaven.
User avatar
Lieutenant jpliberty
 
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 2:21 pm
Location: United States

Re: Valid Question

Postby Aradhus on Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:01 am

Aradhus wrote:Could someone enlighten me as to what a "blanket block" is?
User avatar
Major Aradhus
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:14 pm

Re: Valid Question

Postby Jeff Hardy on Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:11 am

Aradhus wrote:
Aradhus wrote:Could someone enlighten me as to what a "blanket block" is?

i think he is refferring to the time max got blocked for account sitting wth about 50 people

an error was made and the players couldnt play each other either

so players like Pc, KoG, 300, KH,... were blocked from playing with/against max but also blocked from playing with/against each other
General Jeff Hardy
 
Posts: 1338
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:22 am
Location: Matt Hardy's account, you can play against me there

Re: Valid Question

Postby Bruceswar on Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:16 am

jpliberty wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:I have to agree here. Max was blocked with about 30 people, most them noteworthy. They then would block all these players from each other. Terrible if you ask me.The reason is fear of max playing multiple accounts at once. Now max is gone. Legit question to a terrible ruling to begin with. Should have only been max with everybody.


what the bleep does this mean? No one could follow this...this is an absolutely unintelligible bunch of nonsense. For example: Noteworthy? What is that? Max was blocked, you say, with about 30. Was that ok, was it not?

I cannot follow this. Then, I don't follow the kind of twisted logic which most of those who have played with people like Max and Scott-Land, etc. All are cheats.



Are you serious? Did you pay attention at all. The main reason all these players were blocked was Max. He is now gone, so no threat of him making games with multiple accounts to play all the moves. Read the original thread and then maybe you will understand the premise of this thread.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Valid Question

Postby jpliberty on Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:31 am

Bruceswar wrote:
jpliberty wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:I have to agree here. Max was blocked with about 30 people, most them noteworthy. They then would block all these players from each other. Terrible if you ask me.The reason is fear of max playing multiple accounts at once. Now max is gone. Legit question to a terrible ruling to begin with. Should have only been max with everybody.


what the bleep does this mean? No one could follow this...this is an absolutely unintelligible bunch of nonsense. For example: Noteworthy? What is that? Max was blocked, you say, with about 30. Was that ok, was it not?

I cannot follow this. Then, I don't follow the kind of twisted logic which most of those who have played with people like Max and Scott-Land, etc. All are cheats.



Are you serious? Did you pay attention at all. The main reason all these players were blocked was Max. He is now gone, so no threat of him making games with multiple accounts to play all the moves. Read the original thread and then maybe you will understand the premise of this thread.


I have no problem with the premise of the thread. I have no way to comprehend your contribution to the thread because it is senseless. One would have to be someone who plays with Scott-Land to decipher your meaning. Senseless words from someone who thinks it is ok to cheat and to posture as some great player.

Read your record. I have. Your play not only is suspect, you cheat. Like all you who put upon this Max guy, all have a stake in the matter. You all are afraid of being called out from one who was in it with you. CC's scoring system is a transparent fraud. There are jerks, like you, who like to think your cheating confers some status, but in the end, cheats are seen for what they, you, are, which is CHEATS.
I'd rather rule in hell than serve in heaven.
User avatar
Lieutenant jpliberty
 
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 2:21 pm
Location: United States

Re: Valid Question

Postby jpliberty on Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:39 am

Anyone who wants to understand the bogus nature of CC's scoring system need only Map Rank Bruceswar. The guy is a cheat, a fraud, a scam on the system.

The guy plays NO ONE. The same few over, and over and over. Just Map Rank this twit.
I'd rather rule in hell than serve in heaven.
User avatar
Lieutenant jpliberty
 
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 2:21 pm
Location: United States

Re: Valid Question

Postby Bruceswar on Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:59 am

Not to take this thread off task, but please keep on topic. I have nearly 2000 Unique defeats in 2600+ games. Now this thread is not about me, this is about getting a dumb block removed.

Damned if you do and damned if you don't.... Play low ranks... you are farming..play high ranks and you are scared shitless.... play many high ranks over and over... you are noob as well.. lol your theory is weak and sad... I always have a few public games open for anybody to join. Join one and see how bad I am..


On Topic... the block should be lifted
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Valid Question

Postby Aradhus on Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:06 am

Maybe I am not fully understanding this, I could use a little more detail, but it seems to me that all these players gave Max their pm so he could account sit for them. Max is the only one at fault here?

Anything else Max did? 9/11? Rise of Nazi Germany? Jesus cruzifiction? Sink the Titanic...?
User avatar
Major Aradhus
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:14 pm

Re: Valid Question

Postby Bruceswar on Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:29 am

Max was the main issue here. So what if he sat for player X. Does not make player X bad. One bad apple ruined CC for many people.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Valid Question

Postby FabledIntegral on Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:58 am

The basic gist was -

Max had a ton of people's passwords. He could thus use these passwords to manipulate games that involve the other players. He could log onto other people's accounts and play poorly or strategically depending on how he wanted the outcome to be, and then use the results of that to play with his own accounts and up his own score. Now that max is banned from the site, he won't have access to the accounts, thus the blocks should no longer be in effect.
Major FabledIntegral
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: Highest Rank: 7 Highest Score: 3810

Re: Valid Question

Postby Prankcall on Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:34 am

I had him finish one speed game as I missed a turn and it was a Team game.Had it not been a team game i simply would have left,had I also known the block woulda been coming I woulda took the DB.I dont see how this qualifies for receiving a block from almost 50-100 players.
Image
Sergeant 1st Class Prankcall
 
Posts: 741
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:38 am
Location: Grand Rapids,Michigan

Re: Valid Question

Postby Johnny Rockets on Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:04 am

Max was a cancer, and thank God he's gone.

But as usual, CC moved in too late, and ham handed.

J
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Johnny Rockets
 
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 9:58 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Re: Valid Question

Postby JOHNNYROCKET24 on Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:20 am

Bruceswar wrote:Max was the main issue here. So what if he sat for player X. Does not make player X bad. One bad apple ruined CC for many people.

player x dint know in advance that max was an issue....geesh, come on. Lets not play stupid now. player x is responsible for his own account. if he handed his password out to another player that made poor choices, than he needs to suck it up and accept the reaction.

I knew there would be a chapter 2 this week in handed out passwords. Everyone is always innocent. Nobody ever does anything wrong. I think we watch too many convict movies to be honest. For once I would like to see a player stand up and say...yes I fucked up. I should not have handed my password out to 35 players. I do it because I like to obtain high scores on the scoreboard and will take any measure see fit in doing so. Than I will salute this player for being a man. But that wont happen. Too many high ranks only care about points.
JR's Game Profile

show
User avatar
Captain JOHNNYROCKET24
 
Posts: 5514
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
Location: among the leets
52

Re: Valid Question

Postby Vace Cooper on Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:40 am

It sounds like something that will blow over in a couple weeks and nobody will even remember anyway. You guys are taking this way to seriously.
Image
owen is a sexy mother f***er
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Vace Cooper
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: MN

Re: Valid Question

Postby KoE_Sirius on Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:40 am

I agree...I have never given my pw to anyone I do not know in real life. I'd trust them with my car keys. My account is a reflection of myself. If I was to let a foul mouthed spotty teenager sit it.Then where would I be. :)
Highest Rank 4th.
User avatar
Captain KoE_Sirius
 
Posts: 1646
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Somerset

Re: Valid Question

Postby KoE_Sirius on Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:42 am

Vace Cooper wrote:It sounds like something that will blow over in a couple weeks and nobody will even remember anyway. You guys are taking this way to seriously.

Yeah what was the name of the first guy that got busted after making it to Conker King...His name was Steve or something. :-s
Highest Rank 4th.
User avatar
Captain KoE_Sirius
 
Posts: 1646
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Somerset

Re: Valid Question

Postby Georgerx7di on Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:40 am

Now I have a question. I never understood what happened with the whole account sitting thing. Were they playing against max when he sat their accounts, or did he start new games for them. What was the actual problem. Because account sitting by itself, as far as I knew, was ok. Can someone enlighten me on this matter.
User avatar
Major Georgerx7di
 
Posts: 2277
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm

Next

Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users