Moderator: Community Team
Prankcall wrote:This brings to mind the Blanket Block some players wrongly received due to Max and his antics.I'm wondering if we can now have this block lifted? Please don't respond saying send an E-Ticket as I done this numerous times.
Aradhus wrote:Could someone enlighten me as to what a "blanket block" is?
Jeff Hardy wrote:why were you guys even blocked in the first place?
and dont give me the max story, i know what happened, i want to know why (for example)herpes cant play spartans
Bruceswar wrote:I have to agree here. Max was blocked with about 30 people, most them noteworthy. They then would block all these players from each other. Terrible if you ask me.The reason is fear of max playing multiple accounts at once. Now max is gone. Legit question to a terrible ruling to begin with. Should have only been max with everybody.
jpliberty wrote:Bruceswar wrote:I have to agree here. Max was blocked with about 30 people, most them noteworthy. They then would block all these players from each other. Terrible if you ask me.The reason is fear of max playing multiple accounts at once. Now max is gone. Legit question to a terrible ruling to begin with. Should have only been max with everybody.
what the bleep does this mean? No one could follow this...this is an absolutely unintelligible bunch of nonsense. For example: Noteworthy? What is that? Max was blocked, you say, with about 30. Was that ok, was it not?
I cannot follow this. Then, I don't follow the kind of twisted logic which most of those who have played with people like Max and Scott-Land, etc. All are cheats.
Aradhus wrote:Could someone enlighten me as to what a "blanket block" is?
Aradhus wrote:Aradhus wrote:Could someone enlighten me as to what a "blanket block" is?
jpliberty wrote:Bruceswar wrote:I have to agree here. Max was blocked with about 30 people, most them noteworthy. They then would block all these players from each other. Terrible if you ask me.The reason is fear of max playing multiple accounts at once. Now max is gone. Legit question to a terrible ruling to begin with. Should have only been max with everybody.
what the bleep does this mean? No one could follow this...this is an absolutely unintelligible bunch of nonsense. For example: Noteworthy? What is that? Max was blocked, you say, with about 30. Was that ok, was it not?
I cannot follow this. Then, I don't follow the kind of twisted logic which most of those who have played with people like Max and Scott-Land, etc. All are cheats.
Bruceswar wrote:jpliberty wrote:Bruceswar wrote:I have to agree here. Max was blocked with about 30 people, most them noteworthy. They then would block all these players from each other. Terrible if you ask me.The reason is fear of max playing multiple accounts at once. Now max is gone. Legit question to a terrible ruling to begin with. Should have only been max with everybody.
what the bleep does this mean? No one could follow this...this is an absolutely unintelligible bunch of nonsense. For example: Noteworthy? What is that? Max was blocked, you say, with about 30. Was that ok, was it not?
I cannot follow this. Then, I don't follow the kind of twisted logic which most of those who have played with people like Max and Scott-Land, etc. All are cheats.
Are you serious? Did you pay attention at all. The main reason all these players were blocked was Max. He is now gone, so no threat of him making games with multiple accounts to play all the moves. Read the original thread and then maybe you will understand the premise of this thread.
Bruceswar wrote:Max was the main issue here. So what if he sat for player X. Does not make player X bad. One bad apple ruined CC for many people.
Vace Cooper wrote:It sounds like something that will blow over in a couple weeks and nobody will even remember anyway. You guys are taking this way to seriously.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users