Page 1 of 1

attacking options.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:34 pm
by superherojones
why can't we chose to attack with only two or one armies like in the real risk board game?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:39 pm
by Darkfire001
No point, since you can choose to deploy however many troops you want ;)

PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 3:53 pm
by Marvaddin
Because you dont need move your armies after the attack, so attack with 3 dice is always better.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:25 am
by SMITH197
but isn't it true in risk, if you role 3 dice, you must move at least 3 armies forward? And if you were to only roll 2 dice, u only had to move 2 armies forward? Why dont we play that way here?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 12:17 pm
by AndyDufresne
Conquer club isn't an exactly replica of RISK the board game. We all don't just play classic map, escalating, 1 fortification, sequential. Perhaps though like those, they could make it an map option of "minimum deployment" when you create the map, just like the other features.

--Andy

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 4:17 pm
by Blitzkreig
Darkfire001 wrote:No point, since you can choose to deploy however many troops you want ;)


Yeah it only moves one of your attacking units into the conquered country so it's to your benefit to attack with the most that you can.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 4:30 pm
by qeee1
Although technically if you only wanted to risk losing a maximum of one troop for some reason, it doesn't allow it. Not that I can see any advantage to that sort of idea.