Moderator: Community Team
fusibaseball wrote:2) What does this Seer role do? It's not on the mafia scum roles list.
Charle wrote:The reason I was quiet probably about the time difference? Your posts are like 2am for me. I already soft claimed on day 1 as well, I am William Freeman from the Village with no important role
fusibaseball wrote:1) When did all this talk about there being a "Seer" become concrete? Can someone point me to where they came to the firm conclusion a Seer is in play?
2) What does this Seer role do? It's not on the mafia scum roles list.
3) Dev's role seems very weak. So this is a one-time use that you can provide to another player so that they can role block someone else? I don't know whether to think you scanned the list of roles and found an easy, tame one to fake claim or are being honest, but I lean towards it being legitimate. You need to use it tonight and hand to whoever you find most trustworthy.
4) Not sure a Doc is in play. I see no evidence of that...yes it's a standard role but the Doc has missed all 3 nights if the role is in play
5) I know personally I'm a Vanilla Townie. King returning no result is not his role being blocked. If the player has no night action then that's the result he gets (as opposed to "staying home" as one person mentioned). Whether anyone else believes me is up to individual judgement but this also informs me Sonic didn't execute the kill night 2. Which leads me to think we have 2 goons and a Godfather/Roleblocker as the third (Scum will always elect to use Goons to carry out night kills because they have nothing else to do, while the other roles can take actions to screw up Town). So by this point I reckon we have 1 goon and 1 Godfather/Busdriver/Deflector whatever in play
swang918 wrote:re pmc, I agree that votanic's defensiveness is weird after two joke votes. But I've played 2 games w vot and have not seen him get pressured much at all, so maybe this is just how he deals with heat. but its something to keep an eye on and consider for sure.
re voting charle, this is just how charle plays, I don't see anything scummy there either.
so from me, no real reads yet. I'm in favor of another randwagon. Vote DDS for going back to his no lynch d1 thing.
pmchugh wrote:swang918 wrote:re pmc, I agree that votanic's defensiveness is weird after two joke votes. But I've played 2 games w vot and have not seen him get pressured much at all, so maybe this is just how he deals with heat. but its something to keep an eye on and consider for sure.
re voting charle, this is just how charle plays, I don't see anything scummy there either.
so from me, no real reads yet. I'm in favor of another randwagon. Vote DDS for going back to his no lynch d1 thing.
This is sticking out to me, I voted charle and swang jumps to the defence. Fusi puts a well thought out explanation together pointing to charle and swang jumps to attack me.
Poison doctor sounds a reasonable claim, but an easy one to make when you go last and there is zero provable actions that come from it when posioner died so early.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users