iancanton wrote:labrador's lack of significance means it ought to be only one territory
Poor Labrador.....
I am sure it is quite significant to some people.
Moderator: Cartographers
iancanton wrote:labrador's lack of significance means it ought to be only one territory










Gozar wrote:The accent is in a different place on Quebec between the map and the legend.iancanton wrote:labrador's lack of significance means it ought to be only one territory
Poor Labrador.....![]()
I am sure it is quite significant to some people.






























natty_dread wrote:I was wrong














Unit_2 wrote:I split Quebec into North & South


























Unit_2 wrote:Also Gimil, do you mean change the text or the glow?
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong














Unit_2 wrote:Ok Gimil, thanks for clearing that up for me, as soon as L.P gets back i'll talk to him.
Now what do you think about the +1 for the cities?
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong














Unit_2 wrote:The answer is No, we DO NOT want a +1 bonus for one territory, it is unfair because they do not conect to more then 3 territorys.
Spliting Quebec is the best option other then +1 bonus, like i said we do not want a +1 bonus, we both don't like it.











Gozar wrote:The accent is in a different place on Quebec between the map and the legend.iancanton wrote:labrador's lack of significance means it ought to be only one territory
Poor Labrador.....![]()
I am sure it is quite significant to some people.
Lone.prophet wrote:labrador is as important as the rest
Lone.prophet wrote:in the canada map labrador also isnt the same region as newfoundland












































































Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users