by Lootifer on Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:03 am
Well not really. You dont need to skirt around the truth: They are an organisation who wants to fight for some cause; and have decided that people who are likely to be counter productive to that cause should be left out.
I understand the NAACP to be a super-equal association; that is they feel that Black Americans deserve higher opportunities (over and above the rest of the population) because of the current, low, level of opportunities: their population base tends to have less opportunities than the rest of the population because -a- there is some latent racism (I am specifically not saying how much of this there is, I dont know) and -b- they tend to make up the lower end of the socioeconomic spectrum. Naturally this will inherently go against what most conservatives believe.
Now I personally think this is a pretty poor strategy; they should simply have let the conservatives in, but not listened to them: the relevant conservatives will soon work out that they are involved with a super-liberal organisation and leave on their own.
/shrug
Oh and btw I dont really support super-equal methods unless they are rather meaningless in the scheme of things (e.g. the association for promotion of white sprinters and black rowers), as they are at best unsustainable, and at worst openly bigoted.
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.