Whenever you've reached an "Agree to Disagree" position with someone,
both parties must immediately fighting a 1v1 to settle the issue--forever
(or until new data is introduced!--haha, lolol!).
Moderator: Community Team
patches70 wrote:That's not a bad idea. PS and Woodruff would have about 50 games going at one time. It might be hard to remember which game corresponds with which argument though. Is there a way to name the game specific to the argument in question that is being decided?
What about freebies who have multiple disagreements but can only have 4 games going at a time? Are additional argument resolution fights put on hold on a first come first fought basis? Does this policy only apply to OT, or also to the rest of the forum as well? I agree that BBS should use his copious free time to keep track of all arguments in all forums on all topics. After all, there can be multiple arguments in a single thread. Someone has to keep track.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users