So what's the best strategic boardgame for you (excluding risk, of course

Moderator: Community Team
kizkiz wrote:Twilight imperium with all the expansions. Awesome tactical game, politics between players, and always close.
The rules are fairly straightforward. The strategies are extremely deep. Stalingrad is by far the most thoroughly and deeply analyzed board war game. Furthermore, the game preserves interest for players at a wide range of levels. Stalingrad is a good game to use to introduce players to hex-based war games.
Dukasaur wrote:Avalon Hill's Stalingrad.
One review: http://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/4651/stalingradThe rules are fairly straightforward. The strategies are extremely deep. Stalingrad is by far the most thoroughly and deeply analyzed board war game. Furthermore, the game preserves interest for players at a wide range of levels. Stalingrad is a good game to use to introduce players to hex-based war games.
Any Avalon Hill game is top-notch, but people who have played a lot of them rank Stalingrad either at or near the top of the list.
Army of GOD wrote:Settlers of Catan or A&A
Lootifer wrote:Army of GOD wrote:Settlers of Catan or A&A
Settlers is a fun negoitation game, but there isnt a huge depth of strategy to it. Also the business model of continual, and expensive, expansions is kinda lame.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Puerto Rico is also a great game.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Lootifer wrote:Army of GOD wrote:Settlers of Catan or A&A
Settlers is a fun negoitation game, but there isnt a huge depth of strategy to it. Also the business model of continual, and expensive, expansions is kinda lame.
Eh, it's a great game if you play with humans face-to-face. Online, it's very lame. I love the wheelin' and dealin' of that game. The strategy arises from what you can arrange with your fellow players/enemies. It depends on the players' skills. (if they're cognizant of when marginal benefits approach marginal costs, then they'd cease coordination. That game depends on (1) how well they're cognizant of this, and (2) other player's persuasion--for better or worse. The strategy arises from the diplomacy, which is dependent on at least 3 teammates of 4-5. That's the key. Having all 5 skilled is superb.
Puerto Rico is also a great game.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users