Moderator: Community Team
Bruceswar Ā» Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
PLAYER57832 wrote:Not sure how much difference there is between 1 and 2. If you want to educate people, isn't that the same as countering incorrect information?
PLAYER57832 wrote:Not sure how much difference there is between 1 and 2. If you want to educate people, isn't that the same as countering incorrect information?
Funkyterrance wrote:I picked the last one because its the closest to "leisure" imho. The votes on the second one explain why so many people seem concerned with disproving what other people think. I just don't get it though.
warmonger1981 wrote:Because Facebook sucks. Curiosity mostly
AAFitz wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:I picked the last one because its the closest to "leisure" imho. The votes on the second one explain why so many people seem concerned with disproving what other people think. I just don't get it though.
Well from my point of view as a number 2 as keeping people in check.
I dont think you can convince too many people of anything if they already disagree, but I feel its very important to counter what seems to you to be completely incorrect information. No one expects to convert anyone per se, but more stand up to what they think is wrong.
Funkyterrance wrote:AAFitz wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:I picked the last one because its the closest to "leisure" imho. The votes on the second one explain why so many people seem concerned with disproving what other people think. I just don't get it though.
Well from my point of view as a number 2 as keeping people in check.
I dont think you can convince too many people of anything if they already disagree, but I feel its very important to counter what seems to you to be completely incorrect information. No one expects to convert anyone per se, but more stand up to what they think is wrong.
Yeah it seems like there are two different versions of #2 then. Yours where you are simply countering with other information and those who are dead set on either conversion or making themselves feel superior(there are plenty of the latter on here).
bedub1 wrote:All of the above.
muy_thaiguy wrote:No "spam", "troll", or "GFY" options.
Thread fail.
Pedronicus wrote:I used to co9me here for a laugh. thenit allwent phattscotty political,so i left.
now he ainthere, i've come back.
mybiggest problemabout posting more is myspace bar is broken
AndyDufresne wrote:It is an outlet for my love of Futurama.
--Andy
nietzsche wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:It is an outlet for my love of Futurama.
--Andy
futurama is like a half erect penis that cannot get hard.
south park is like futurama on viagra.
thegreekdog wrote:nietzsche wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:It is an outlet for my love of Futurama.
--Andy
futurama is like a half erect penis that cannot get hard.
south park is like futurama on viagra.
Futurama is comedy for people with a brain.
South Park is comedy for people with half a brain and for people with a brain.
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap, jusplay4fun