Moderator: Community Team
nietzsche wrote:Winning 9-3, eliminating the other team and start the 9th with a bunt single?
Seriously?
Evil Semp wrote:nietzsche wrote:Winning 9-3, eliminating the other team and start the 9th with a bunt single?
Seriously?
Why is that disrespectful to baseball? A 6 runs is not insurmountable lead. If the losing team is still going to try to score runs why shouldn't the team that is leading try to score more runs. This box score shows it isn't impossible to catch up and make a game out of it.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes ... 5170.shtml
jsnyder748 wrote:good. we don't want other countries giving baseball respect. its ours. its our 5 hour long games. its our boring camera shots of guys chewing. its our...
oh i don't care.
Evil Semp wrote:nietzsche wrote:Winning 9-3, eliminating the other team and start the 9th with a bunt single?
Seriously?
Why is that disrespectful to baseball? A 6 runs is not insurmountable lead. If the losing team is still going to try to score runs why shouldn't the team that is leading try to score more runs. This box score shows it isn't impossible to catch up and make a game out of it.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes ... 5170.shtml
keiths31 wrote:When runs for and against count as a tie breaker, you do all you can to score runs. Take your anger out on the organizers of the tournament...not the team(s) playing within the rules.
Symmetry wrote:jsnyder748 wrote:good. we don't want other countries giving baseball respect. its ours. its our 5 hour long games. its our boring camera shots of guys chewing. its our...
oh i don't care.
There's always cricket. The matches can take days, and rubbing the ball on your arse is part of the game.
Fruitcake wrote:Symmetry wrote:jsnyder748 wrote:good. we don't want other countries giving baseball respect. its ours. its our 5 hour long games. its our boring camera shots of guys chewing. its our...
oh i don't care.
There's always cricket. The matches can take days, and rubbing the ball on your arse is part of the game.
I miss those days of rubbing the ball around my bollocks. That gentle red stain on one's whites was worn with pride and said "Yes, I am a bowler"
nietzsche wrote:keiths31 wrote:When runs for and against count as a tie breaker, you do all you can to score runs. Take your anger out on the organizers of the tournament...not the team(s) playing within the rules.
I thought about that, but baseball unwritten rules are above the rules of the tournament, specially when these rules are not the normal rules.
The hitter knew the beaning was coming, he should've just taken it.
Only issue is that the pitcher didn't take the order of the catcher to hit him the first two pitches.
nietzsche wrote:They can hit all the homers they want, grand slams, they can make 30 more runs if they want to, you just don't bunt single to start the top of the 9th when you are winning 9-3 without much contest.
keiths31 wrote:nietzsche wrote:keiths31 wrote:When runs for and against count as a tie breaker, you do all you can to score runs. Take your anger out on the organizers of the tournament...not the team(s) playing within the rules.
I thought about that, but baseball unwritten rules are above the rules of the tournament, specially when these rules are not the normal rules.
The hitter knew the beaning was coming, he should've just taken it.
Only issue is that the pitcher didn't take the order of the catcher to hit him the first two pitches.
I have to disagree. When you could lose out on moving to the next round by a single run, you need all you can get. Italy didn't let up on Canada and mercied them.
What I thought was against the un-written rules of baseball was that if after your first attempt at beaning a player fails and you try a second time and then get warned by the ump, that you don't try a third time. If he had hit him on the first attempt, he would have taken his base and no fight would have broken out. But the Mexican pitcher needed three attempts to hit him.
Army of GOD wrote:Nietzsche just has his panties in a bunch because La Mexique lost.
nietzsche wrote:Army of GOD wrote:Nietzsche just has his panties in a bunch because La Mexique lost.
But we beat the USAwho has the best team ever in a WBC.
nietzsche wrote:Evil Semp wrote:nietzsche wrote:Winning 9-3, eliminating the other team and start the 9th with a bunt single?
Seriously?
Why is that disrespectful to baseball? A 6 runs is not insurmountable lead. If the losing team is still going to try to score runs why shouldn't the team that is leading try to score more runs. This box score shows it isn't impossible to catch up and make a game out of it.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes ... 5170.shtml
Evil Semp wrote:nietzsche wrote:Evil Semp wrote:nietzsche wrote:Winning 9-3, eliminating the other team and start the 9th with a bunt single?
Seriously?
Why is that disrespectful to baseball? A 6 runs is not insurmountable lead. If the losing team is still going to try to score runs why shouldn't the team that is leading try to score more runs. This box score shows it isn't impossible to catch up and make a game out of it.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes ... 5170.shtml
And you sr. don't know baseball.[/qoute]nietzsche wrote:On the contrary sir. It is you who doesn't know baseball if you think a 6 run lead can't be over come.
nietzsche wrote:
I'm not saying they had to strike out 3 times in the 9th. They could've made 30 runs if they wanted.
You are not getting my point. A bunt single to start the top of the 9th after you are winning 9-3 without much contest is cheap and classless. Narrators both in english and spanish even predicted the beaning BEFORE the first attempt to hit the batter.
nietzsche wrote:Evil Semp wrote:nietzsche wrote:Evil Semp wrote:nietzsche wrote:Winning 9-3, eliminating the other team and start the 9th with a bunt single?
Seriously?
Why is that disrespectful to baseball? A 6 runs is not insurmountable lead. If the losing team is still going to try to score runs why shouldn't the team that is leading try to score more runs. This box score shows it isn't impossible to catch up and make a game out of it.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes ... 5170.shtml
And you sr. don't know baseball.[/qoute]nietzsche wrote:On the contrary sir. It is you who doesn't know baseball if you think a 6 run lead can't be over come.
???
So you know more than ex-professional players? Because those think (as well as anyone who knows about baseball) that it was classless.
You do get it was a BUNT single? I'm not saying they could not score more runs, I'm talking about the way.
This is my last post on this matter, it's obvious that those who are responding to it don't know what I'm talking about.
notyou2 wrote:nietzsche wrote:Evil Semp wrote:nietzsche wrote:Evil Semp wrote:nietzsche wrote:Winning 9-3, eliminating the other team and start the 9th with a bunt single?
Seriously?
Why is that disrespectful to baseball? A 6 runs is not insurmountable lead. If the losing team is still going to try to score runs why shouldn't the team that is leading try to score more runs. This box score shows it isn't impossible to catch up and make a game out of it.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes ... 5170.shtml
And you sr. don't know baseball.[/qoute]nietzsche wrote:On the contrary sir. It is you who doesn't know baseball if you think a 6 run lead can't be over come.
???
So you know more than ex-professional players? Because those think (as well as anyone who knows about baseball) that it was classless.
You do get it was a BUNT single? I'm not saying they could not score more runs, I'm talking about the way.
This is my last post on this matter, it's obvious that those who are responding to it don't know what I'm talking about.
I do know what you are talking about. I did respond why Canada did what they did, you just chose to ignore me. Or perhaps you have foed me.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users