Moderator: Community Team
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Phatscotty wrote:1. If you can get arrested for hunting or fishing without a license, but not for being in the country illegally… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
2. If you have to get your parents permission to go on a field trip or take an aspirin in school, but not to get an abortion… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
3. If you have to show identification to board an airplane, cash a check or check out a library book, but not to vote… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
4. If the government wants to ban stable, law-abiding citizens from owning gun magazines with more than ten rounds, but gives 20 F-16 fighter jets to the crazy new leaders in Egypt... you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
5. If, in our largest city, you can buy "two" 16-ounce sodas, but not a 24-ounce soda because 24-ounces of a sugary drink might make you fat… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
6. If an 80-year-old woman and 3 yr old child can be stripped searched by the TSA, but a woman in a hijab is only subject to having her neck and head searched… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
7. If your government believes that the best way to eradicate trillions of dollars of debt is to spend trillions more… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
8. If a seven year old boy can be thrown out of school for saying his teacher is cute, but hosting a sexual exploration or diversity class in grade school is perfectly acceptable… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
9. If children are forcibly removed from parents who discipline them with spankings while children of addicts are left in filth and drug infested homes… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
10. If hard work and success are met with higher taxes and more government intrusion, while not working is rewarded with EBT cards, WIC checks, Medicaid, subsidized housing, and free cell phones… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
11. If you pay your mortgage faithfully, denying yourself the newest big screen TV while your neighbor buys iPhones, TVs and new cars, and the government forgives his debt when he defaults on his mortgage… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
12. If being stripped of the ability to defend yourself makes you more safe according to the government… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
ooge wrote:3. If you have to show identification to board an airplane, cash a check or check out a library book, but not to vote… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
If you live in a Democracy and you think the best way to decide elections is to have the fewest amount of people or "acceptable" people to vote as possible....You are a conservative
Phatscotty wrote:Oogey, which one is the best example of "Extreme right wing radio listening talking points Blather"?
Let's talk about it
ooge wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Oogey, which one is the best example of "Extreme right wing radio listening talking points Blather"?
Let's talk about it
Bud this is a dangerous area to discuss. I will add that I am an elections inspector in the state of New York.The Attempts at voter fraud country wide are negligible.what ID is supposedly try to prevent is in person voter fraud.Tell me how many people have to be involved with in person voter fraud to affect a general election? Think about it.How do you get that many people organized? How do they keep quiet about participating in this fraud,someone Always talks. And lastly The people who work the elections work the same districts,When we see people come into vote we recognize A lot of them.If someone comes in saying they are "John Doe" Chances are we remember that "John Doe" past away a few months ago
Phatscotty wrote:ooge wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Oogey, which one is the best example of "Extreme right wing radio listening talking points Blather"?
Let's talk about it
Bud this is a dangerous area to discuss. I will add that I am an elections inspector in the state of New York.The Attempts at voter fraud country wide are negligible.what ID is supposedly try to prevent is in person voter fraud.Tell me how many people have to be involved with in person voter fraud to affect a general election? Think about it.How do you get that many people organized? How do they keep quiet about participating in this fraud,someone Always talks. And lastly The people who work the elections work the same districts,When we see people come into vote we recognize A lot of them.If someone comes in saying they are "John Doe" Chances are we remember that "John Doe" past away a few months ago
Can I see your source for the negligible claim? Also, will you admit up front that voter fraud is extremely difficult to detect, much less prosecute? As well as when a state has been decided by 8% points, will you admit up front that most if not all of any cases of voter fraud are dropped in those areas? And if you would be so kind as to offer an opinion on the issue of REPUBLICANS! stealing the 2004 election for Bush?
and btw, the results have been in on this one for a while.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=177949&hilit=voter+i.d.
ooge wrote:3. If you have to show identification to board an airplane, cash a check or check out a library book, but not to vote… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
If you live in a Democracy and you think the best way to decide elections is to have the fewest amount of people or "acceptable" people to vote as possible....You are a conservative
ooge wrote:Phatscotty wrote:ooge wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Oogey, which one is the best example of "Extreme right wing radio listening talking points Blather"?
Let's talk about it
Bud this is a dangerous area to discuss. I will add that I am an elections inspector in the state of New York.The Attempts at voter fraud country wide are negligible.what ID is supposedly try to prevent is in person voter fraud.Tell me how many people have to be involved with in person voter fraud to affect a general election? Think about it.How do you get that many people organized? How do they keep quiet about participating in this fraud,someone Always talks. And lastly The people who work the elections work the same districts,When we see people come into vote we recognize A lot of them.If someone comes in saying they are "John Doe" Chances are we remember that "John Doe" past away a few months ago
Can I see your source for the negligible claim? Also, will you admit up front that voter fraud is extremely difficult to detect, much less prosecute? As well as when a state has been decided by 8% points, will you admit up front that most if not all of any cases of voter fraud are dropped in those areas? And if you would be so kind as to offer an opinion on the issue of REPUBLICANS! stealing the 2004 election for Bush?
and btw, the results have been in on this one for a while.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=177949&hilit=voter+i.d.
lots of questions to answer http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plu ... _blog.html lets start here
chang50 wrote:Given that we are talking about the USA here,in cases where the OP does not specify we can safely assume this,can I ask one question?By what criteria can it be said the USA was founded by geniuses,and if this is so,how did so many geniuses come to be concentrated in one place at the same time?
Ray Rider wrote:ooge wrote:3. If you have to show identification to board an airplane, cash a check or check out a library book, but not to vote… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
If you live in a Democracy and you think the best way to decide elections is to have the fewest amount of people or "acceptable" people to vote as possible....You are a conservative
Meh, we Canadians are required to show voter ID to vote and we have a higher turnout that you guys down south. Maybe if you followed our example more people would vote! jk Seriously though, I don't see why it's such a big deal to you down there to have reasonable precautions against voter fraud.
ooge wrote:will you admit up front that voter fraud is extremely difficult to detect, much less prosecute? As well as when a state has been decided by 8% points, will you admit up front that most if not all of any cases of voter fraud are dropped in those areas. How many people Have to be in on the Fraud? it would never stay quiet.This being a pet issue of republicans They would prosecute. and scream from the rooftops If they found widespread cases of voter fraud. On the other hand If your party was defeated badly in an election The way to delegitimize the president and spoil the waters of his beginning presidency is to claim voter fraud.This is were I differ from conservatives the most. If you lose you lost,Your Ideas were rejected. To continue to fight immediately after the election is bad for the country and un American. Bush stealing the election in Ohio? The left using the same delegitimizing tactic....Your poll? do a poll on the death tax people will say "what you get taxed for dieing?" instead of calling it the "death tax" and call it by its true name "the inheritance tax" And explain we have this because The country does not believe in royalty witch is what would happen after several generations of a wealthy family.
BigBallinStalin wrote:ooge wrote:will you admit up front that voter fraud is extremely difficult to detect, much less prosecute? As well as when a state has been decided by 8% points, will you admit up front that most if not all of any cases of voter fraud are dropped in those areas. How many people Have to be in on the Fraud? it would never stay quiet.This being a pet issue of republicans They would prosecute. and scream from the rooftops If they found widespread cases of voter fraud. On the other hand If your party was defeated badly in an election The way to delegitimize the president and spoil the waters of his beginning presidency is to claim voter fraud.This is were I differ from conservatives the most. If you lose you lost,Your Ideas were rejected. To continue to fight immediately after the election is bad for the country and un American. Bush stealing the election in Ohio? The left using the same delegitimizing tactic....Your poll? do a poll on the death tax people will say "what you get taxed for dieing?" instead of calling it the "death tax" and call it by its true name "the inheritance tax" And explain we have this because The country does not believe in royalty witch is what would happen after several generations of a wealthy family.
Can't one submit votes on behalf of an organization?
(I'm mostly in agreement with you ITT; just askin').
ooge wrote:chang50 wrote:Given that we are talking about the USA here,in cases where the OP does not specify we can safely assume this,can I ask one question?By what criteria can it be said the USA was founded by geniuses,and if this is so,how did so many geniuses come to be concentrated in one place at the same time?
Americans some times have a inflated view of ourselves...lol
john9blue wrote:yeah but... one of the geniuses had sex with his slave!
who cares what they think anyway?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users