Moderator: Community Team
Wikipedia wrote:[Biscuits and gravy] consists of soft dough biscuits covered in either sawmill or sausage gravy, made from the drippings of cooked pork sausage, white flour, milk, and often (but not always) bits of sausage, bacon, ground beef, or other meat. The gravy is often flavored with black pepper.
Wikipedia wrote:American English and British Engligh use the word "biscuit" to refer to distinctly different modern foods. Early hard biscuits (North American:cookies) were derived from a twice-baked bread whereas the North American biscuit is similar to a savory European scone... [Biscuits and gravy] emerged as a distinct regional dish after the American Revolutionary War when stocks of food stuffs were in short supply.
thegreekdog wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biscuits_and_gravy
And, as we do with most things, the United States has improved the British version dramatically.
thegreekdog wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biscuits_and_gravy
And, as we do with most things, the United States has improved the British version dramatically.Wikipedia wrote:American English and British Engligh use the word "biscuit" to refer to distinctly different modern foods. Early hard biscuits (North American:cookies) were derived from a twice-baked bread whereas the North American biscuit is similar to a savory European scone... [Biscuits and gravy] emerged as a distinct regional dish after the American Revolutionary War when stocks of food stuffs were in short supply.
Tripitaka wrote:No, with typical warped American logic, you just took the name and applied it to something else, even though it doesn't fit with the original meaning.
Tripitaka wrote:And I'd take a British scone over an American biscuit any day of the week, especially with lashings of clotted cream and fresh strawberry jam! If I want to smother something in gravy (brown gravy that is, made by mixing a roux with stock and meat juices, not that awful white stuff you have here), then I'd have suet dumplings instead!
thegreekdog wrote:Tripitaka wrote:No, with typical warped American logic, you just took the name and applied it to something else, even though it doesn't fit with the original meaning.
I think if you re-read my post, you would understand that I acknowledged the confusion between biscuits and cookies.
thegreekdog wrote:Tripitaka wrote:And I'd take a British scone over an American biscuit any day of the week, especially with lashings of clotted cream and fresh strawberry jam! If I want to smother something in gravy (brown gravy that is, made by mixing a roux with stock and meat juices, not that awful white stuff you have here), then I'd have suet dumplings instead!
With a belly full of biscuits and gravy, I would outperform you in any event!
khazalid wrote:Tell ya something else - the hershey bar should be used to make candles, and nothing else. You guys have the collective palette of a dungfly battling mouth cancer.
jonesthecurl wrote:Have you tasted what the US has the bare-faced gall to sell under the name "Rolo"?
mrswdk wrote:Why do they make stupid biscuits that crumble in your mouth and paste your tongue and all your teeth dark brown?
Tripitaka wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Tripitaka wrote:No, with typical warped American logic, you just took the name and applied it to something else, even though it doesn't fit with the original meaning.
I think if you re-read my post, you would understand that I acknowledged the confusion between biscuits and cookies.
I don't need to re-read it, I understood it the first time, thanks.
Tripitaka wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Tripitaka wrote:And I'd take a British scone over an American biscuit any day of the week, especially with lashings of clotted cream and fresh strawberry jam! If I want to smother something in gravy (brown gravy that is, made by mixing a roux with stock and meat juices, not that awful white stuff you have here), then I'd have suet dumplings instead!
With a belly full of biscuits and gravy, I would outperform you in any event!
O'rly, how about giving birth?
Tripitaka wrote:thegreekdog wrote:And, as we do with most things, the United States has improved the British version dramatically.
No, with typical warped American logic, you just took the name and applied it to something else, even though it doesn't fit with the original meaning.
thegreekdog wrote:Ah, I should have known. You were using the royal "you."
thegreekdog wrote:Tripitaka wrote:thegreekdog wrote:With a belly full of biscuits and gravy, I would outperform you in any event!
O'rly, how about giving birth?
Yes, if I was a woman.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Tripitaka wrote:No, since there is no such construct as the royal "you", only the "Royal we", which refers to a single person (the speaker to be precise) and as anyone with an ounce of reading comprehension can see, I wasn't doing that here.
Serbia wrote:ITT Tripi gets her British on and pwns.
Bollocks.
khazalid wrote:Tell ya something else - the hershey bar should be used to make candles, and nothing else. You guys have the collective palette of a dungfly battling mouth cancer.
thegreekdog wrote:Tripitaka wrote:No, since there is no such construct as the royal "you", only the "Royal we", which refers to a single person (the speaker to be precise) and as anyone with an ounce of reading comprehension can see, I wasn't doing that here.
What were you doing? By using the word "you" it appeared that you were indicating that I (thegreekdog) was taking the name and applying it to something else. At least that is what I think you meant. But I didn't do that.
Yes, but I will never give up.
Tripitaka wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Tripitaka wrote:No, since there is no such construct as the royal "you", only the "Royal we", which refers to a single person (the speaker to be precise) and as anyone with an ounce of reading comprehension can see, I wasn't doing that here.
What were you doing? By using the word "you" it appeared that you were indicating that I (thegreekdog) was taking the name and applying it to something else. At least that is what I think you meant. But I didn't do that.
Yes, but I will never give up.
*sighs* Really? Okay let me try to explain in more simple terms.
You said "we....the United States..." Here "we" refers to the US/American people
I replied "No.....you...." Here "you", used as a plural pronoun, also refers to the US/American people. Simple, eh? In my response the addition of "the United Sates" to qualify the "you" was unnecessary as I was replying directly to your quote and since I live in America I know full well what biscuits are here and that unless you are a time traveller, it is highly unlikely that you came up with the name for them!
Tripitaka wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Tripitaka wrote:No, since there is no such construct as the royal "you", only the "Royal we", which refers to a single person (the speaker to be precise) and as anyone with an ounce of reading comprehension can see, I wasn't doing that here.
What were you doing? By using the word "you" it appeared that you were indicating that I (thegreekdog) was taking the name and applying it to something else. At least that is what I think you meant. But I didn't do that.
Yes, but I will never give up.
*sighs* Really? Okay let me try to explain in more simple terms.
You said "we....the United States..." Here "we" refers to the US/American people
I replied "No.....you...." Here "you", used as a plural pronoun, also refers to the US/American people. Simple, eh? In my response the addition of "the United Sates" to qualify the "you" was unnecessary as I was replying directly to your quote and since I live in America I know full well what biscuits are here and that unless you are a time traveller, it is highly unlikely that you came up with the name for them!
thegreekdog wrote:To get back on topic (yes, I'm giving up)... I'm not a big fan of biscuits (a/k/a cookies). I do enjoy scones, but prefer them to be fresh baked from an actual baker (sorry Starbucks).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users